 |
 |
Why no ATI Radeon 9800 256MB Mac Edition?
|
 |
|
 |
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Saint Charles, IL, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
IM really curious to know why know one is asking about why we are not getting a ATI Radeon 9800 with 256MB of Ram as a Retail product for G5's? I wish Apple was offering a 256MB version as a BTO for the G5's...
Locutus27
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Indiana
Status:
Offline
|
|
Probably because they are expensive and pretty much useless from a consumer standpoint.
Even for the PC.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
becuase, mac users dont represent a large and profitable enough market to ATI to create more than one type of the same card.
|
|
"Take a little dope...and walk out in the air"
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Jul 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
The 256 version really is a useless card... I'm kinda happy they aren't making it for mac. I'm sure it wasn't very profitable at all for ATI anyways.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: MA, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
The only advantage to a 256MB card is the ability to play UT2003 at 1600X1200 wth everything on.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Senior User
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: san diego
Status:
Offline
|
|
why does ther have to be two verisons in the first place...
It would seem like ATI and any other graphic chip maker would make there products operating system blind for the most part...
I hate trying to find a MAC only card at Frys...
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Winnipeg
Status:
Offline
|
|
Shoot what does MAC stand for again? Something with Audio right? Or was it machine... whatever...
I'm sure someone within the next five posts with go
MAC you mean ________?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
 |
Forum Rules
|
 |
 |
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |