 |
 |
Where are the 1.42s?
|
 |
|
 |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
Greetings,
I've been looking around comparing the Dual 1.25 to the Dual 1.42 power macs. For reason see my previous post:
http://forums.macnn.com/showthread.p...hreadid=170383
One thing I noticed is that I havn't really seen any new 1.42s. Did apple abandon them? All the ones on apples site are 1.25. Maczone.com is only selling 1.25 machines as well. I've seen a few refurbs advertised but thats it. Is there something wrong with them or did the G5 coming out cause apple to drop them.
Also on the 1.25 issue I've been reading they had heat issues, and I've heard they had noise issues too. Is that the case with the current 1.25s?
Thanks,
Devmage
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
I noticed one thing on apples site.
"Dual 1.25GHz PowerPC G4
2MB L3 cache/processor"
This is on the highest in G4. The 1.42 was the only machine I saw mentioned with the 2MB cache. Did they start under clocking the 1.42s to 1.25? Just a thought.
Devmage
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
The 1.25 machines are OS 9 compatible, something the 1.42's wern't. Basicially Apple got ris of the PowerMacs with Firewire 800 and such when the G5 was announced, and kept the generation before PowerMacs as the OS 9 machine.
In theory Apple could probably put the 1.42 into the old motherboards, but they probably didn't want to deal with a supply issue on a machine that is on it's way out anyhow.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: WV, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Yep, the "new" Dual 1.25Ghz machines have 2MB of L3 cache...the weird part is a SINGLE 1.25Ghz machine has only 1MB of L3 cache...how does one 1.25Ghz chip have 1MB while another 1.25Ghz chip have 2MB of L3 cache...strange indeed.
And BTW, the new single & dual 1.25Ghz machines are both OS 9 and OS X bootable.
|
|
5G 60GB video iPod
512MB iPod Shuffle
Westone UM1 Canalphones
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Caught in a web of deceit.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by AssassyN:
Yep, the "new" Dual 1.25Ghz machines have 2MB of L3 cache...the weird part is a SINGLE 1.25Ghz machine has only 1MB of L3 cache...how does one 1.25Ghz chip have 1MB while another 1.25Ghz chip have 2MB of L3 cache...strange indeed.
L3 cache isn't on the chip.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: WV, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Ahhh, thanks for clarifying...I could've sworn I heard somewhere "on-die L3 cache"...ah well, I do still wonder why Apple didn't offer 1.42Ghz chips in their remaining G4s rather than 1.25Ghz ones...maybe the heat problems they ran into was too much for them to worry over.
|
|
5G 60GB video iPod
512MB iPod Shuffle
Westone UM1 Canalphones
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Rochester, NY
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Status:
Offline
|
|
The 1.42GHz is basically just an overclocked 1.2GHz chip 
|
|
MacPro 2.66, 5GB RAM, 250GB + 160GB HDs, 23" Cinema Display
MacBook Pro 1.83GHz, 2GB RAM (from work)
MacBook (White) 1.83GHz, 2GB RAM
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Northampton, MA USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Since the 1.42GHz chip is the fastest part Moto is shipping at the moment, it probably commands a premium price. I suspect that Apple wanted to keep the prices of the G4 towers as low as they could. There's no technical reason they couldn't have dropped 1.42GHz chips onto the motherboards.
From what I remember of the benchmarks, I don't think there was a huge performance difference between the dual-1.25 and dual-1.42 anyway. The 167MHz bus means there's a diminishing return on processor speed increases. Given the price of the 1.42 in the last G4 lineup, I always thought the dual-1.25 was the best value.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: BFE
Status:
Offline
|
|
If you want a 1.42 dual you'd have to get new-old stock if you can find some or buy refurbed.
|

I'm a bird. I am the 1% (of pets).
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
SmallDog.com still has some I think, might be refurbs but who the hell cares.
I'd go 1.42 at this point, if you are going to go G4 you might as well pimp it to the max since even the pimped 1.42 is CHEAP!
|
|
MacBook and iMac Core 2 Duo 24"
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Bellevue, WA
Status:
Offline
|
|
I agree! Smalldog got some refurbished and open-box DP 1.42s.. better get it quick.
It will be an amazing upgrade from your iBook
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: New York City
Status:
Offline
|
|
I can vouch for SmallDog's refurbed 1.42 G4 units. Got one, "pimped" it out (2GBRAM, 800GB HDs), crazy fast CD burner to come....
...it arrived a day earlier than Small Dog promised it, packed good as new, everything went very smoothly. Great place to do business with.
A week later and I'm still so thrilled with this machine, ebullient, effervescent, PSYCHED. Performance improvement from single processor 933 is terrific. More than enough to keep me happy until late 2004/early 2005, when I buy my first G5 duallie (can you imagine what that machine will be like?). LOL!
Have the CPU monitor open all of the time. 
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
Thanks for all info guys. Eventually after much discussion with myself and others hehe I decided to get a G5, the 1.8 version. Couldn't justify the extra $600+ dollars for the Dual when I probably won't need that kinda power anyways I'm not a rocket scientist hehe Not to mention I need to buy a LCD display for it too.
I'm sure I'll be happy though, so its ordered. Though I have a creepy shipdate. On or before 9/11.
Devmage
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
I'm not buying a new Mac this year or next year. Why waste my money. I'm going for the top of the line tower in 2006. It will be a much better computer than anything you can buy in the next couple of years. Although I have heard rumors that Apple will release an even faster machine in '07. But then again, '08 may be the big year for Macs! But...if I have already waited that long...
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by awcopus:
I can vouch for SmallDog's refurbed 1.42 G4 units. Got one, "pimped" it out (2GBRAM, 800GB HDs), crazy fast CD burner to come....
...it arrived a day earlier than Small Dog promised it, packed good as new, everything went very smoothly. Great place to do business with. 
A week later and I'm still so thrilled with this machine, ebullient, effervescent, PSYCHED. Performance improvement from single processor 933 is terrific. More than enough to keep me happy until late 2004/early 2005, when I buy my first G5 duallie (can you imagine what that machine will be like?). LOL!
Have the CPU monitor open all of the time.
Oh boy. You are so easy to satisfy
It can be good though.
Look at me....I am very hard to please....that's putting me into depression all the time 
|
|
MacPro 2.66, 5GB RAM, 250GB + 160GB HDs, 23" Cinema Display
MacBook Pro 1.83GHz, 2GB RAM (from work)
MacBook (White) 1.83GHz, 2GB RAM
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: New York City
Status:
Offline
|
|
Leonis, you must have missed all of my G5 threads where I go off on its expandability problems. I am NOT easy to please. But I am thrilled with my new machine, and concede that it's a machine that many people dismiss as a POS.
Nonetheless, depite a little permissions issue that arose earlier today (OSX weirdness), it's definitely making me smile a lot these days.
I am also very excited about seeing how the G5 compares to this machine. I'm sure that the performance tests will include my machine, and I'm eager to learn about just how much faster the G5 performs.
AMAZINGLY great year to be a Mac guy. First iPod, first dual processor, first online music purchases, first video conferencing... wonder what else is coming? 
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Bellevue, WA
Status:
Offline
|
|
The DP 1.42Ghz G4 was the "high-end" model. It is still a kick-ass machine IF you take good care of it. If you think it is a good deal, go for it while supply last.
Of course the G5-era just getting started in its introduction stage.
Once again.. last model vs. first revision. History tells me that Rev. A Mac is sometimes buggy and need to wait for delivery.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
 |
Forum Rules
|
 |
 |
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|