 |
 |
B&W G3 - How Much Memory
|
 |
|
 |
|
Senior User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Due to hard times I sold my iMac 800 and am back to using a B&W G3 400 (Rev 2). I put in a 30 GB 7200 rpm hard drive in it. It runs 10.2 pretty well with the current 256 MB memory. I am thinking about adding another 256 MB, but wondered if there would be any benefit to going any higher than that. I mainly run Project Builder, BBEdit, Terminal, Safari and Mail with occasional forays into PS Elements, Graphic Converter, and iPhoto. Oh, and iTunes of course.
My thinking is that I'll see a noticeable difference going 256->512 but beyond that it wouldn't make that much of a difference.
I know the general consensus is to throw as much memory into the machine as possible, but finances being what they are...
Thanks in advance for any advice.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Moderator Emeritus 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: College Park, MD
Status:
Offline
|
|
OSX is the most memory inefficient operating system I've used. You will definitely see a performance boost going to 512MB of ram. For light use there's no reason to go beyond that, however.
--Scott
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Senior User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Thanks, I figured 512MB would be the "sweet spot" for my purposes.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by techtrucker:
Thanks, I figured 512MB would be the "sweet spot" for my purposes.
Yeah, at 256, doubling that will def help.
|

Uisce
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Senior User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
The order's been placed, should be here Thursday, will post the results. Thanks.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: california
Status:
Offline
|
|
hopefully this won't be a problem, but the B&W's need low-density RAM (they don't support the newer, high-density stuff). you'll know if you received a high-density chip if your mac only sees and uses half of the RAM on it (i.e. it'll report it to be a 128MB chip, assuming you've ordered one 256MB chip).
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Senior User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by superlarry:
hopefully this won't be a problem, but the B&W's need low-density RAM (they don't support the newer, high-density stuff). you'll know if you received a high-density chip if your mac only sees and uses half of the RAM on it (i.e. it'll report it to be a 128MB chip, assuming you've ordered one 256MB chip).
Thanks for the heads up, will find out tomorrow.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Senior User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Portland, OR
Status:
Offline
|
|
FWIW, I had noticed a good jump in speed going from 512 to 768 on my B&W. I just popped in another 256MB to 1GB and noticed another speed jump, smaller, but noticeable.
As they say..OS X is a RAM pig..give it all you can afford.
|
|
iMac - C2D, 2.8Ghz, 4GB, 320GB
MacBook - C2D, 2.4Ghz Uni, 4GB, 500GB
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
 |
Forum Rules
|
 |
 |
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|