Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Hardware - Troubleshooting and Discussion > Mac Desktops > Which G5 is for me?

Which G5 is for me?
Thread Tools
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Boston, MA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 18, 2003, 12:49 PM
 
I been lurking here for years and am now in need of some advice....

Which G5 should I purchase.

I am a Graphic designer, and work on a G5 1.6 at work. My system at home is a B/W G3 400. I love the 1.6 and had planned on buying one - until the rumors came about and now I have the option of the dual 1.8.

I am a casual gamer, nothing too hard core - but want to be able to play the new games as they come out.

My main programs I usedaily are Photoshop, Illustrator, Quark, Flash, and Indesign.

I have around $2500 in my budget, and can squeak some more out if needed.

Should I go with a 1.6 and get the ATI 9600 upgrade and load it with RAM or go with the Dual 1,8 and the ATI 9600 and less RAM? (upgrading the RAM down the line)

And one other question, will they upgrade the video card at an Apple store?

Thanks for the advice guys and gals - I appreciate it in advance!
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: South of the Mason-Dixon line
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 18, 2003, 01:05 PM
 
dual 1.8 and less RAM

I think the dual models will retain their value much longer than the singles. Probably a better, um, investment to buy the dual 1.8. If you can use the word 'investment' to describe a computer purchase. Then again, Macs seem to hold their value quite well when compared to any peecee.
     
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Boston, MA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 18, 2003, 01:28 PM
 
Another option is to Buy the 1.6 and get myself a new Apple Monitor. (Since I still have the horrid Big Blue 17")
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 18, 2003, 01:46 PM
 
I'd get the dual 1.8. It will last you much longer than a single 1.6. It's got more RAM slots, it's faster, and it will keep up better under a heavy load (e.g. doing many things at once).
Mac Pro 2x 2.66 GHz Dual core, Apple TV 160GB, two Windows XP PCs
     
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Long Island,NY
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 18, 2003, 02:07 PM
 
MacMall has the single processor 1.8GHz G5 for $2094.00 which is only $100.00 more than the 1.6 GHz was yesterday.
     
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Feb 2001
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 18, 2003, 02:39 PM
 
At this point I'd say anybody looking at getting a G5 should get the dual 1.8, unless you're a high-end user that can use every bit of speed, in which case go for the 2.0. The 1.6 G5 is still crippled, and if that's the most you can afford I'd consider the dual G4 which will provide equal or better performance in most cases.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Isle of Manhattan
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 18, 2003, 02:46 PM
 
I'd go with the dual 1.8, and buy the memory elsewhere.
You'll love having two processors, especially with Photoshop.
     
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Boston, MA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 18, 2003, 03:33 PM
 
Thanks for the comments.

I had some one at work trying to convince me that I would ever need the power of a dual processor MAC - that the 1.6 would be plenty for me and the desktop publishing and web work that I do...

I just need to hear other opinions - I get so confused when it's time to make big purchases....
     
Eug
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Caught in a web of deceit.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 18, 2003, 03:36 PM
 
Dual 1.8, no question. RAM is cheap.

Or else single 1.8.
     
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Jun 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 18, 2003, 03:36 PM
 
If you are happy with a 1.6 then you might consider a single 1.8 from macwarehouse for 2100. I want the dual 1.8.
Dual 1.8 GHz G5
PB G4 1.67 GHz
     
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Boston, MA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 18, 2003, 03:58 PM
 
My 1.6 here at work screams (upgraded from a G4 400) - I have had no slow downs at all.

But I keep hearing the word "Crippled" assiated with the 1.6 so that kinda bugs me.
     
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Atlanta
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 18, 2003, 04:57 PM
 
dual G5 1.8

The single 1.8 made no sense, and now as a dual, it's the hot ticket. I just bought a dual 2GHz. I would buy the dual 1.8GHz if I had to make that choice today.
MacBook Pro C2D 2.16GHz 2GB 120GB OSX 10.4.9, Boot Camp 1.2, Vista Home Premium
mac mini 1.42, 60GB 7200rpm, 1GB (sold), dual 2GHz/G5 (sold), Powerbook 15" 1GHz (sold)
dual G4 800MHz (sold), dual G4 450MHz (sold), G4 450MHz (sold), Powerbook Pismo G3 500MHz (sold)
PowerMac 9500 132MHz 601, dual 180MHz 604e, Newer G3 400MHz (in closet)
Powermac 7100 80MHz (sold), Powermac 7100 66MHz (sold)
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:30 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2