Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Hardware - Troubleshooting and Discussion > Mac Desktops > G5 Dual: GHz vs. RAM

G5 Dual: GHz vs. RAM
Thread Tools
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Santa Barbara, CA, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 3, 2004, 07:30 PM
 
What's the better configuration for mostly Final Cut Pro use?

1.8 GHz dua G5l w/1GB RAM (2x512)

or

2 GHz dual G5 w/512 MB RAM
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 3, 2004, 07:35 PM
 
I'd go with the 1.8 with extra RAM. 512 MB is fine for everyday use, but for video editing it's a pretty light amount. Even 1 GB is just enough.

"That's Mama Luigi to you, Mario!" *wheeze*
     
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 3, 2004, 07:46 PM
 
I disagree. Get the 2.0 dual & use the 512 for now. You can always add RAM later. You can never add the faster processors.
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Hong Kong
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 3, 2004, 08:20 PM
 
Originally posted by rsgunther:
You can never add the faster processors.
Are you sure?
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: ~/
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 3, 2004, 08:26 PM
 
Cheaper to add RAM than to replace processors.
     
Senior User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 3, 2004, 08:26 PM
 
when calculating this i hope you're not basing your budget on the cost of adding RAM from Apple. You can buy RAM from a place like Crucial for far less than Apple and it's just as good.

As for Final Cut Pro, the more RAM the better for editing DV. You might want to consider more like 2 gigs of RAM if you're going to be doing a lot of serious cutting.
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2001
Location: ~/
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 4, 2004, 01:40 AM
 
I say go with the faster processors as well. Memory is fairly cheap and much easier to upgrade later on than processors are. It has yet to be determined if G5s will ever be available from third parties. The extra 200MHz per processor is going to mean a little bit of saved time on every render for every project. Eventually the saved time is going to add up to be more than the initial cost difference between the 1.8GHz DP and 2GHz DP.
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 4, 2004, 02:06 AM
 
Yeah, I'll have to change my mind and say go with the dual 2.0 with less RAM. The thing is, I'd rather end up with more RAM and a slower processor than the other way around, but it makes more sense to get the faster processor now and upgrade the RAM as you can afford it.

"That's Mama Luigi to you, Mario!" *wheeze*
     
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Arizona
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 4, 2004, 02:16 AM
 
Dual 2.0, 512. More RAM later.
I like chicken
I like liver
Meow Mix, Meow Mix
Please de-liv-er
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 4, 2004, 08:31 AM
 
With all that said, doing any serious work in Final Cut with 512M of RAM is suicide. Doing it with 1GB is probably not too smart either. Consider that 300MB or so will be eaten up by the system, and you've got nothing left to load previews, move data around, etc without thrashing the hell out of your disk.
Mac Pro 2x 2.66 GHz Dual core, Apple TV 160GB, two Windows XP PCs
     
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 4, 2004, 10:06 AM
 
Get the Dual 1.8. Look at the benchmark differences between the Daul 2 and Dual 1.8. Unless you are doing hours and hours of video compression, you won't notice a difference. And if that's the case, you need more than 1GB of memory either way. Also, refurbished Dual 1.8s are going for $1999; that's a great price if you can live with the cheaper video card (no BTO for refurbs). That's what I'm going with if I can't wait for the new revisions.
     
BZ
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2001
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 4, 2004, 10:53 AM
 
There were a series of benchmarts (somewhere) that showed that the real sweet spot is 4GB of Ram.

So, in that case, get a refurbed 1.8 and add 3.5 GB of Ram ($500).

BZ
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:09 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2