Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Hardware - Troubleshooting and Discussion > Mac Desktops > IBM's POWER chief scientist says Apple to get a POWER5 derivative...

IBM's POWER chief scientist says Apple to get a POWER5 derivative...
Thread Tools
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Dangling something in the water… of the Arabian Sea
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 7, 2004, 09:16 PM
 
...eventually.

http://www.serverwatch.com/hreviews/...0823_3364691_2

POWER5 will also have a Macintosh-based derivative down the road. "We just haven't announced what this will look like," Sinharoy said, citing IBM's "strong relationship with Apple."



Something else to speculate about... after WWDC...
     
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Arizona
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 7, 2004, 09:17 PM
 
...durr?
I like chicken
I like liver
Meow Mix, Meow Mix
Please de-liv-er
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Dangling something in the water… of the Arabian Sea
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 7, 2004, 09:59 PM
 
Originally posted by PowerMacMan:
...durr?
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Somewhere, but not here.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 7, 2004, 10:34 PM
 
Originally posted by Eug Wanker:
...eventually.

http://www.serverwatch.com/hreviews/...0823_3364691_2

POWER5 will also have a Macintosh-based derivative down the road. "We just haven't announced what this will look like," Sinharoy said, citing IBM's "strong relationship with Apple."
pretty vague quote....notice he says "haven't announced" which probably means he left out the "because apple does not want us to announce it yet..." part. and "down the road" could mean 2 weeks from now. just trying to read between the lines....
Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity...
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Dangling something in the water… of the Arabian Sea
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 7, 2004, 10:40 PM
 
Originally posted by Mr. Blur:
pretty vague quote....notice he says "haven't announced" which probably means he left out the "because apple does not want us to announce it yet..." part. and "down the road" could mean 2 weeks from now. just trying to read between the lines....
Well, IBM has been announcing the chips Apple uses many months before they appear in Macs. It just doesn't say Apple will use them.

eg. The G5 1.8 970 was announced in October 2002, while the G5 2.5 970FX was announced back in February.

IBM has not announced any specifics for any sort of POWER5-lite chip yet.
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Tronna
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 8, 2004, 03:06 PM
 
IBM can announce all they want, it's the manufacturing and delivering they're falling down on.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Cupertino, CA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 8, 2004, 04:49 PM
 
Sounds counting chickens before they've hatched in light of the G5 production issues.

If we get a Power5 derivative, I wonder if this time we'll get to see some of the chip multiprocessing or symmetric multithreading technology. I'd imagine we will, since Intel/AMD will be heading in that direction by then.
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Dangling something in the water… of the Arabian Sea
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 8, 2004, 04:54 PM
 
Originally posted by itai195:
If we get a Power5 derivative, I wonder if this time we'll get to see some of the chip multiprocessing or symmetric multithreading technology. I'd imagine we will, since Intel/AMD will be heading in that direction by then.
Probably, since POWER5 includes SMT.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Cupertino, CA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 8, 2004, 05:04 PM
 
Originally posted by Eug Wanker:
Probably, since POWER5 includes SMT.
Doesn't Power4 include CMP? I guess it's easier to remove that from a derivative than SMT would be.
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:57 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2