Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Hardware - Troubleshooting and Discussion > Mac Desktops > New low end G5...

New low end G5...
Thread Tools
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 19, 2004, 07:58 AM
 
So who is gonna order one?

$1349 with edu discount, looks mighty tempting...

(i.e., What market is this thing geared to?)

I am thinking about one to complement my 12" PB...
blabba5555555555555555555555555555555555555
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: ZZ9 Plural Z Alpha
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 19, 2004, 08:32 AM
 
As far as I can tell the new G5 spec exactly matches that of the midrange iMac G5, only it costs £50 more and you don't get a 17 inch flatscreen with it.

Hmm.

Sure it's more upgradeable, but £50 more for a flatscreen less? I dunno...
|\|0\/\/ 15 7|-|3 71|\/|3
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: fredericksburg va
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 19, 2004, 08:39 AM
 
this is the headless iMac lol
     
dav
Mac Elite
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: sic semper tyrannis
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 19, 2004, 08:51 AM
 
Originally posted by siMac:
Sure it's more upgradeable, but £50 more for a flatscreen less? I dunno...
upgradeable is important for many (heck, just the upgradeable graphics would make many happy), but it also has a 8x superdrive, firewire 800, optical audio in.

i'd buy it over an imac, but i just ordered a refurb powermac last week.
     
Senior User
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Deer Crossing, CT
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 19, 2004, 08:51 AM
 
Originally posted by siMac:
As far as I can tell the new G5 spec exactly matches that of the midrange iMac G5, only it costs £50 more and you don't get a 17 inch flatscreen with it.

Hmm.

Sure it's more upgradeable, but £50 more for a flatscreen less? I dunno...
While you don't get a screen with the new low-end PowerMac, you do get up to 4GB of RAM, instead of the 2GB max on the iMac. Also, you get firewire 800, the ability to have 2 HDs as well.

If this was released at the same time the new iMacs were released, I'd really have a tough choice even though these don't come with screens (probably would've bought an LCD monitor to share between my PowerBook and this). Oh well, I'm still digging my new 20" iMac.

Just yesterday I rendered a test scene with Blender/Yafray and the 1.8GHz G5 with 600MHz buss totally blew away my 1.25GHz G4 with 166(200?)MHz buss. I mean, the iMac was finished at least a solid minute faster than my PowerBook on a sub-5 minute render.
20" iMac G5! :D AND MacBook 1.83GHz!
Canon Digital Rebel Kit + 75 - 300mm lens. Yum Yum! :D
Check out my OS X Musical Scales program
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: ZZ9 Plural Z Alpha
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 19, 2004, 08:57 AM
 
Originally posted by PBG4 User:
Just yesterday I rendered a test scene with Blender/Yafray and the 1.8GHz G5 with 600MHz buss totally blew away my 1.25GHz G4 with 166(200?)MHz buss. I mean, the iMac was finished at least a solid minute faster than my PowerBook on a sub-5 minute render.
|\|0\/\/ 15 7|-|3 71|\/|3
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 19, 2004, 09:15 AM
 
Originally posted by videian28:
this is the headless iMac lol
blabba5555555555555555555555555555555555555
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Alabama
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 19, 2004, 10:40 AM
 
Originally posted by PBG4 User:
Just yesterday I rendered a test scene with Blender/Yafray and the 1.8GHz G5 with 600MHz buss totally blew away my 1.25GHz G4 with 166(200?)MHz buss. I mean, the iMac was finished at least a solid minute faster than my PowerBook on a sub-5 minute render.
good to hear.
i think the low end is targeting semi-professional users. like students that want a machine that has the power and expandibility to handle their projects. i'm sure some will buy just on the fact that its so upgradable.
http://www.mafia-designs.com
     
Forum Regular
Join Date: May 2004
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 19, 2004, 12:30 PM
 
Spending $500 to go from a single 1.8 to a dual 1.8 seems more compelling than spending $500 to go from a dual 1.8 to a dual 2.0. My point is that since this only has a single, they should have made it a *nice* single like a 2 or even (gasp!) a 2.5. Either that or lower the price a bit.
     
Baninated
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: http://www.rotharmy.com
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 19, 2004, 12:44 PM
 
i agree 100%

os-x is made for dualies

if yer gonna blow that much money , go the whole hog and get the dual 1.8 . its the best vfm pmac
     
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: England
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 19, 2004, 01:25 PM
 
I'm very very tempted.

I'm running a new 20" display off the Powerbook at the mo, would love to get the G5 system, up the video to the 9600 and Airport and drop in 1GB RAM from the PC.

Still, will have to work out my money first. I can cope with the G4 for now, but I could do with something a bit quicker for CoD etc to run better on the 20" display.
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Alabama
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 19, 2004, 01:55 PM
 
Originally posted by NemesisEG:
CoD
Call of Duty? game is awesome. it runs like a dream on my dual 1.8 with the 9600. heh all my friends with pc come and are like in awe on how much better it ru ns on a MAC!!!! hah
http://www.mafia-designs.com
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Washington, DC
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 19, 2004, 01:56 PM
 
Tons of differences:
- Dual Monitor Support
- Multiple Hard Drive Support
- Gig. Ethernet
- More RAM
- Firewire 800
- Digital Audio
- Upgradable Graphics Card*
- The tower will prove to be faster then the iMac
- The drive is mounted horizontally (faster)
- Upgradable, upgradable, upgradable...

You need to remember that some of us are rather opposed to the all in one concept, yet don't have $1800 for just the cpu. This is targeted at people that need power, but more so, expandability.
     
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Dec 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 19, 2004, 02:33 PM
 
I'd been planning on getting a next revision iMac, but am now going to get the low end G5. Planning to sign up for the ADC Student membership to get the hardware discount...that cuts the price way down.

This, to me, is a better choice than the iMac because of the easy upgradability. Example: I plan to not order a model with a SuperDrive - I'd rather purchase (and put in) a dual layer DVD writer. And, of course, the GPU issues.

Additionally, I have more faith in the longevity of a PowerMac. Look at the number of 3rd party upgrades that are still being released for the G4 (and G3) towers. Awesome ^_^

I'm pumped!
(Last edited by lpetschauer; Oct 19, 2004 at 02:38 PM. )
     
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Oct 2004
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 19, 2004, 02:41 PM
 
I'd start with the education price, downgrade the optical drive to a combo drive and save $90 more, drop the modem for $26, upgrade the 5200 to a 9600 w/128 mb ram for $46, and bam, you have a decent gaming computer for $1278. To me, this is a more compelling option than the iMac, although I'll reserve final judgement until I see some benches.
Don't blame me - I voted Democrat
     
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: England
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 19, 2004, 02:58 PM
 
CoD. Call of Duty, aye.

I think this entry-level machine is going to do very well indeed. As mentioned above, drop a couple of items, add in the 9600 and you've got a VERY nice machine.
     
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: NORAD (England branch)
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 19, 2004, 03:15 PM
 
Originally posted by NemesisEG:
I'm very very tempted.

I'm running a new 20" display off the Powerbook at the mo, would love to get the G5 system, up the video to the 9600 and Airport and drop in 1GB RAM from the PC.

Still, will have to work out my money first. I can cope with the G4 for now, but I could do with something a bit quicker for CoD etc to run better on the 20" display.
Hello mate! Junior member eh? Heh.

 iMac Core 2 Duo 17" 2ghz 3gb/250gb ||  iBook G4 12" 1.33ghz 1gb/40gb
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Beautiful Downtown Portland
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 19, 2004, 05:03 PM
 
Originally posted by mitchell_pgh:
Tons of differences:
- Dual Monitor Support
- Multiple Hard Drive Support
- Gig. Ethernet
- More RAM
- Firewire 800
- Digital Audio
- Upgradable Graphics Card*
- The tower will prove to be faster then the iMac
- The drive is mounted horizontally (faster)
- Upgradable, upgradable, upgradable...

You need to remember that some of us are rather opposed to the all in one concept, yet don't have $1800 for just the cpu. This is targeted at people that need power, but more so, expandability.
Bingo!

I've been extremely vocal in criticizing Apple for not having exactly this machine.

Now they have it. I am stoked. I will be buying it. Thank you Apple for finally listening.
"There he goes. One of God's own prototypes. Some kind of high powered mutant never even considered for mass production. Too weird to live, and too rare to die." -- Hunter S. Thompson
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2000
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 19, 2004, 06:10 PM
 
New single 1.8?

Thoroughly underwhelmed.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Winnipeg
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 19, 2004, 06:13 PM
 
This is 2166 CND, with an edu discount. I think perhaps in my fourth year (not next year but the one after) I may very well get one of these. Or perhaps at the end of next summer though I doubt that. Anyway probably once they get up to 2.5 or something (IE when the high end is much higher) It'd be nice to accompany my 12 incher with a nice 1.8Ghz though.
     
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: England
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 20, 2004, 04:01 AM
 
Originally posted by WOPR:
Hello mate! Junior member eh? Heh.
*shakes fist*

Git.
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: 33-37-22.350N / 111-54-37.920W
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 20, 2004, 08:42 AM
 
This is great! A REAL entry level PM G5... I can't believe they can make money on it.. hell, the tower case and, power supply and fans alone have to go for close to a grand!

Good work Apple... Where were you before I got a real job??
Mac Pro 3.0, ATI 5770 1GB VRAM, 10GB, 2xVelociraptor boot RAID, 4.5TB RAID0 storage, 30" & 20" Apple displays.
2 x Macbook Pro's 17" 3.06 4 GB RAM, 256GB Solid State drives
iMac 17" Core Duo 1GB RAM, & 2 iPhones 8GB, and a Nano in a pear tree!
Apple user since 1981
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Alabama
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 20, 2004, 09:23 AM
 
Originally posted by UnixMac:
This is great! A REAL entry level PM G5... I can't believe they can make money on it.. hell, the tower case and, power supply and fans alone have to go for close to a grand!

Good work Apple... Where were you before I got a real job??
agreed. i think it would have been nice to see a 2.0 single instead of a 1.8. but still a nice maching.
http://www.mafia-designs.com
     
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Jun 2004
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 20, 2004, 09:49 AM
 
Originally posted by UnixMac:
This is great! A REAL entry level PM G5... I can't believe they can make money on it.. hell, the tower case and, power supply and fans alone have to go for close to a grand!

Good work Apple... Where were you before I got a real job??
Um, you're being sarcastic about the case and power supply/fans costing Apple $1000.00, right? More like $300.00, if that much.
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: 33-37-22.350N / 111-54-37.920W
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 20, 2004, 10:06 AM
 
Originally posted by Zubir:
Um, you're being sarcastic about the case and power supply/fans costing Apple $1000.00, right? More like $300.00, if that much.
yeah... it depends on how you "cost" them... in Managerial Accounting & Cost Accounting they have a science to "costing" a product... for me to say $1000, I'm talking end buyer cost really, and not Apple's cost... as I'm sure Apple's cost on a PM G5 Dual 2.5 is about $1000 in materials and labor or less. But then there is the marketing, liability, R&D, Overhead, etc... that adds up to basically 90-95% of the retail cost of a machine with respect to their bottom line income.

So, short answer.. yes I was exaggerating a bit.
Mac Pro 3.0, ATI 5770 1GB VRAM, 10GB, 2xVelociraptor boot RAID, 4.5TB RAID0 storage, 30" & 20" Apple displays.
2 x Macbook Pro's 17" 3.06 4 GB RAM, 256GB Solid State drives
iMac 17" Core Duo 1GB RAM, & 2 iPhones 8GB, and a Nano in a pear tree!
Apple user since 1981
     
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Syracuse, NY
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 20, 2004, 11:44 AM
 
Originally posted by Bookie:
I'd start with the education price, downgrade the optical drive to a combo drive and save $90 more, drop the modem for $26, upgrade the 5200 to a 9600 w/128 mb ram for $46, and bam, you have a decent gaming computer for $1278. To me, this is a more compelling option than the iMac, although I'll reserve final judgement until I see some benches.
Keep the modem for $26. You never know when you might need it in your lifetime. You could probably do it for faxing and such. I haven't used mine on my Powerbook, but at least I know it's there for faxing stuff and Internet.
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Richmond,Va
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 20, 2004, 12:44 PM
 
Originally posted by buffalolee:
Keep the modem for $26. You never know when you might need it in your lifetime. You could probably do it for faxing and such. I haven't used mine on my Powerbook, but at least I know it's there for faxing stuff and Internet.
The $26 dollars spent now could help with resell time comes around also.
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Tronna
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 20, 2004, 01:45 PM
 
Originally posted by Superchicken:
This is 2166 CND, with an edu discount. I think perhaps in my fourth year (not next year but the one after) I may very well get one of these. Or perhaps at the end of next summer though I doubt that.
So you're going to buy a 2 year old computer at its list price?
     
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Globetrotting
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 20, 2004, 08:50 PM
 
Nice move by Apple no doubt. As noted it pushed the 1.6 refurb to $1199. Though rare a few Rev A SP 1.8s go up there. They used to be $1499 and may maintain that price with PCI-X and the faster bus.

Tough time to have taken the fall off and deciding to move half way around the world, lots of hasty purchases to resist.
If a group of mimes are miming a forest and one falls down, does he make a sound?
     
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Oct 2004
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 21, 2004, 03:17 AM
 
I was gonna buy the 1.8 GHz iMac, but now I'm having a hard time deciding between the iMac and the PM 1.8 .

Both is about the same price, except that the iMac comes with a screen.
I don't have the money to buy one of Apple's nice monitors (they should have a new model for 17" or even 15" ...), but I guess there are other nice brands which sell cheap/good monitors.

Either way, they will beat my current 700MHz eMac .
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: 33-37-22.350N / 111-54-37.920W
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 21, 2004, 09:55 AM
 
Originally posted by Daragon:
I was gonna buy the 1.8 GHz iMac, but now I'm having a hard time deciding between the iMac and the PM 1.8 .

Both is about the same price, except that the iMac comes with a screen.
I don't have the money to buy one of Apple's nice monitors (they should have a new model for 17" or even 15" ...), but I guess there are other nice brands which sell cheap/good monitors.

Either way, they will beat my current 700MHz eMac .
get a new MP G5, and then get the 17" Apple Display that has been discontinued... it's gonna go for a song now.
Mac Pro 3.0, ATI 5770 1GB VRAM, 10GB, 2xVelociraptor boot RAID, 4.5TB RAID0 storage, 30" & 20" Apple displays.
2 x Macbook Pro's 17" 3.06 4 GB RAM, 256GB Solid State drives
iMac 17" Core Duo 1GB RAM, & 2 iPhones 8GB, and a Nano in a pear tree!
Apple user since 1981
     
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Jan 2004
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 21, 2004, 03:03 PM
 
Maybe it's just me but why not splurge on the dual 1.8? It's a $500 difference but you reasonably double the life of your system. Also resale will be better on a dual. Maybe I'm just speaking to a bunch of people who don't have a lot of money.
     
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Apr 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 21, 2004, 04:00 PM
 
As an entry-level machine for those who won't notice the second processor in their usage pattern, the $500 is probably better spent on a (non-Apple, obviously) DVI-equipped LCD screen
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Alabama
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 21, 2004, 04:10 PM
 
Originally posted by power142:
As an entry-level machine for those who won't notice the second processor in their usage pattern, the $500 is probably better spent on a (non-Apple, obviously) DVI-equipped LCD screen
true
http://www.mafia-designs.com
     
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Colorado
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 21, 2004, 11:32 PM
 
Originally posted by power142:
As an entry-level machine for those who won't notice the second processor in their usage pattern, the $500 is probably better spent on a (non-Apple, obviously) DVI-equipped LCD screen
Or more memory, since the Power Mac comes with such a paltry amount.
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: New York City, NY
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 22, 2004, 12:07 AM
 
• 256MB DDR400 SDRAM (PC3200) - 2x128
• 160GB Serial ATA - 7200rpm
• ATI Radeon 9600 XT w/128MB DDR SDRAM
• Apple Cinema Display (20" flat panel)
• AirPort Extreme Card
• Bluetooth Module
• 56k V.92 modem.
• 8x Super Drive (DVD-R/CD-RW)
• Apple Keyboard & Apple Mouse - U.S. English
• Mac OS X - U.S. English



Subtotal $2,769.00

a quality powermac (only needs a bit of RAM) + cinema display somewhat within reach now! (somewhat as in hmm.. close, but no.)
iamwhor3hay
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: 33-37-22.350N / 111-54-37.920W
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 22, 2004, 12:11 AM
 
Originally posted by MrForgetable:
• 256MB DDR400 SDRAM (PC3200) - 2x128
• 160GB Serial ATA - 7200rpm
• ATI Radeon 9600 XT w/128MB DDR SDRAM
• Apple Cinema Display (20" flat panel)
• AirPort Extreme Card
• Bluetooth Module
• 56k V.92 modem.
• 8x Super Drive (DVD-R/CD-RW)
• Apple Keyboard & Apple Mouse - U.S. English
• Mac OS X - U.S. English



Subtotal $2,769.00

a quality powermac with decent stuff + cinema display somewhat within reach now! (somewhat as in hmm.. close, but no.)
Less than 1/2 what I paid for my system.... and I assure you my system isn't twice as fast... not a bad deal if you ask me.
Mac Pro 3.0, ATI 5770 1GB VRAM, 10GB, 2xVelociraptor boot RAID, 4.5TB RAID0 storage, 30" & 20" Apple displays.
2 x Macbook Pro's 17" 3.06 4 GB RAM, 256GB Solid State drives
iMac 17" Core Duo 1GB RAM, & 2 iPhones 8GB, and a Nano in a pear tree!
Apple user since 1981
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: In bits and pieces on Cloud City
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 22, 2004, 12:18 AM
 
For most people it would be much smarter to get an iMac.
"Curse my metal body, I wasn't fast enough!"
     
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Oct 2004
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 22, 2004, 01:31 PM
 
Originally posted by Disgruntled Head of C-3PO:
For most people it would be much smarter to get an iMac.
Unless. like me, you want a computer that will still be a viable gaming rig 2 years from now. I guess you're right though that gamers are in the minority.
Don't blame me - I voted Democrat
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: 33-37-22.350N / 111-54-37.920W
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 22, 2004, 06:34 PM
 
Originally posted by Bookie:
Unless. like me, you want a computer that will still be a viable gaming rig 2 years from now. I guess you're right though that gamers are in the minority.
especially on the Mac, which is a shame cause if Game developers took the time to make good games that were optimized for the Mac, they'd be amazed at how many people would buy them. The problem is that most Mac games are ported over from PC code and the portability of that code is also the weakness of how it runs on a Mac.
Mac Pro 3.0, ATI 5770 1GB VRAM, 10GB, 2xVelociraptor boot RAID, 4.5TB RAID0 storage, 30" & 20" Apple displays.
2 x Macbook Pro's 17" 3.06 4 GB RAM, 256GB Solid State drives
iMac 17" Core Duo 1GB RAM, & 2 iPhones 8GB, and a Nano in a pear tree!
Apple user since 1981
     
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Dec 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 26, 2004, 12:32 AM
 
So is it true that the processor is soldered to the motherboard? That's what hardmac is saying.
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Alabama
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 26, 2004, 01:05 AM
 
Originally posted by lpetschauer:
So is it true that the processor is soldered to the motherboard? That's what hardmac is saying.
i wonder why they'd do that? so they can replace whole mobo's on processor failure
http://www.mafia-designs.com
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2000
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 26, 2004, 07:00 AM
 
Originally posted by power142:
As an entry-level machine for those who won't notice the second processor in their usage pattern, the $500 is probably better spent on a (non-Apple, obviously) DVI-equipped LCD screen
it's called an iMac G5, and the screen comes free.

Wasn't there an entry level G5 1.6GHz tower at this price 2 years ago - but with a faster system bus? 2 years is a long time to wait for a 200Mhx speed bump (and a bus speed drop . . .)
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Downtown Austin, TX
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 26, 2004, 07:09 AM
 
I think it was just a year and a few months ago.
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2000
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 26, 2004, 07:32 AM
 
Originally posted by jamil5454:
I think it was just a year and a few months ago.
You're correct. June 2003.

OK. I revise my earlier statement:

16 months is a long time to wait for a 200 MHz cpu hike and a system bus speed drop . . .

Plus if you can find an 'old' 1.8 SP you not only get PCI-X but twice the no. of RAM slots but a faster bus too.

Still thoroughly underwhelmed.
     
Senior User
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Deer Crossing, CT
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 26, 2004, 07:41 AM
 
Originally posted by booboo:
You're correct. June 2003.

OK. I revise my earlier statement:

16 months is a long time to wait for a 200 MHz cpu hike and a system bus speed drop . . .

Plus if you can find an 'old' 1.8 SP you not only get PCI-X but twice the no. of RAM slots but a faster bus too.

Still thoroughly underwhelmed.
I'm hoping that someone figures out how to change the buss multiplyer so all of us buying new iMacs & SP PMacs can up our buss speed to the best 1:2 ratio.
20" iMac G5! :D AND MacBook 1.83GHz!
Canon Digital Rebel Kit + 75 - 300mm lens. Yum Yum! :D
Check out my OS X Musical Scales program
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2000
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 26, 2004, 09:09 AM
 
Originally posted by PBG4 User:
I'm hoping that someone figures out how to change the buss multiplyer so all of us buying new iMacs & SP PMacs can up our buss speed to the best 1:2 ratio.
This guy is usually first

http://www.bekkoame.ne.jp/~t-imai/maine.html
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: ~/
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 27, 2004, 12:19 PM
 
I'd trade the 1.4GHz GigE G4 in my office for a "new" 1.8GHz G5 in a New York second! No PCI-X, 4 RAM slots and all.

     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Columbus, OH
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 27, 2004, 08:53 PM
 
Originally posted by booboo:
You're correct. June 2003.

OK. I revise my earlier statement:

16 months is a long time to wait for a 200 MHz cpu hike and a system bus speed drop . . .

Plus if you can find an 'old' 1.8 SP you not only get PCI-X but twice the no. of RAM slots but a faster bus too.

Still thoroughly underwhelmed.
Lucky me. I got the 'old' 1.8 SP as a refurb at MicroCenter for $754. 160gb hd, 512mb RAM, SuperDrive.

HyperNova Software, LLC
     
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Colorado
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 27, 2004, 08:55 PM
 
Originally posted by msuper69:
Lucky me. I got the 'old' 1.8 SP as a refurb at MicroCenter for $754. 160gb hd, 512mb RAM, SuperDrive.

I'll give you $850 for it.
     
 
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:32 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2