Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Hardware - Troubleshooting and Discussion > Mac Desktops > UK mini review

UK mini review
Thread Tools
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 6, 2005, 01:53 PM
 
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/newspap...471717,00.html

i was confused by this article is it praise or not. i suppose it has some valid points though.

any ideas?

MacbookPro dual 2Ghz 1GB Ram 128 Graphics
     
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brussels, Belgium
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 6, 2005, 07:25 PM
 
Well, (a) registration required, and (b) it's the Times, as in Murdoch-owned xenophobic lie-through-its-teeth News Corp rag, so... (a) there's no way I'm registering to read the article, and (b) I'm thinking we shouldn't give it too much credence either way.
     
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Feb 2004
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 7, 2005, 02:12 AM
 
He doesn't get the target market for the mac mini, is the problem. Why didn't he look at a base model, with 512MB RAM and a wired keyboard / mouse? Why compare it in performance with a dual 2.5GHz G5? Plus, there's always going to be cheaper PCs, with a "comparable" specification - until you take the software (and size, and quietness, and coolness, and ...) into consideration...
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Staffs, UK
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 8, 2005, 03:22 AM
 
I was more pissed off by the description of Mail and Safari as anaemic - what, did he miss all those pop-up and virus attachments or something ?
     
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Jan 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 8, 2005, 07:54 AM
 
Originally posted by Gee4orce:
I was more pissed off by the description of Mail and Safari as anaemic - what, did he miss all those pop-up and virus attachments or something ?
Anaemic is a good decription for Safari. Why be pissed off? It's not your program. I think all of us here of sound mind cn agree Safari is behind Camino and Firefox.

And Windows PCs, as much as you might hate to admit it, also have the capability of disabling pop-ups, ActiveX controls, etc etc. Just use Firefox and Thunderbird rather than IE and Outlook Express and be done with it.

Jeff
(unbiased Mini owner)
     
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brussels, Belgium
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 8, 2005, 10:20 AM
 
Wait - what's anaemic about them? I use Safari on my Mac and Firefox on my PC and they're both excellent (and very similar to boot). The only concrete advantage of Firefox (for me) is the ability to block ads, but then you wouldn't expect Apple as a commercial company to offer that. It'd be nice to have extensions for Safari, but frankly the only extensions I use with Firefox (other than adblock) are the ones that make it more like Safari.

As for Mail - what's the criticism?
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:57 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2