Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Hardware - Troubleshooting and Discussion > Mac Desktops > I would have been happy with this...

I would have been happy with this...
Thread Tools
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Atlanta
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 26, 2005, 01:16 PM
 
Current cpu rollout, dual 2, 2.3 and 2.7

The history of the G5 is not that of impressive gain.

At least they are not slow chips and the OS can cope with some multitasking, so things are not a total loss here.

But differentiation in other areas:

2 drive bays with doors

4 hard drives

standard bluetooth, standard bluetooth keyboard/mouse (OMGF did apple just nix 2 cables forever!?!?)

standard airport

standard superdrive and or/dual layer

They force this huge case on you and you can't put burners and drives in it? Return to expandability. People want their computers/devices to do different things.

Continued leadership in noise level control. Apple does not get enough credit for ushering in the era of quieter computing. I'm happy with my multifanned dual G5.

----

The above can be accomplished, especially considering:

1. the technology is right there, just utilize it

2. the apple upgrade cycle can be a lil' slow, so, give us the goods

3. Apple act all boutique and chic, so, walk the walk, highbrow that thang' mayn. You got a mac? You can burn DVDs, you can do wireless, you have bluetooth... not even a question...

4. throw a quad G5 2.5 out there just to mix it up and lay the groundwork for quad dual cores.

5. get at least one or two CAD level cards kickin' and make a push in serious 3d creation in 1-2 years (hardware and software optimzed)

ok, aight
(Last edited by sodamnregistered2; Apr 26, 2005 at 02:52 PM. )
MacBook Pro C2D 2.16GHz 2GB 120GB OSX 10.4.9, Boot Camp 1.2, Vista Home Premium
mac mini 1.42, 60GB 7200rpm, 1GB (sold), dual 2GHz/G5 (sold), Powerbook 15" 1GHz (sold)
dual G4 800MHz (sold), dual G4 450MHz (sold), G4 450MHz (sold), Powerbook Pismo G3 500MHz (sold)
PowerMac 9500 132MHz 601, dual 180MHz 604e, Newer G3 400MHz (in closet)
Powermac 7100 80MHz (sold), Powermac 7100 66MHz (sold)
     
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2002
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 26, 2005, 01:25 PM
 
I agree with you. If IBM can't deliver 3GHz then add more L2 cache(this should have been done last year), add more bays etc. In other words, fix the stuff that they can control.
     
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Seattle
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 26, 2005, 02:24 PM
 
absolutely no excuse for the case to be that huge and have such limited expandability. cooling zones or not. Put the PS on the floor and make that hard drive space.
PowerMac G4 Gigabit 1.2GHz, 896MB, 2x 80GB WD SE, Pioneer 107, Radeon 9000 Pro 128MB

Macintosh TV
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:14 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2