 |
 |
IBM recommending mini - as Linux based Multimedia System!
|
 |
|
 |
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Transatlantic flight, first class, third row, aisle seat
Status:
Offline
|
|
Doh, who'd have thought that IBM would describe in detail how a mac mini is perfectly suitable to be used as a linux based multimedia system that can be controlled from another computer via a web browser interface...
IBM developerWorks
|
|
- What is your nationality?
- I'm a drunkard. That makes me a citizen of the world.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Belgium
Status:
Offline
|
|
PowerPC G4 microprocessor. The motherboard is jumper-configurable from 1.25 to 1.58GHz (the jumpers are soldered), with the standard speeds from Apple being 1.25 or 1.42GHz. Find a link in Resources to a site with all the overclocking details you might want, if that sort of thing appeals to you. Overclocking is totally unnecessary for this application and I don't recommend it. The Mac mini is already frisky enough for everything you need to do.
Does that mean that the 1.42 is an overclocked 1.25 ?
|

iMac 20" C2D 2.16 | Acer Aspire One | Flickr
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Nevada (Not Las Vegas)
Status:
Offline
|
|
Maybe it is because the Mini uses the IBM PowerPC Chip... The more Minis sold = more IBM chips sold... they are looking out for numero uno
|
|
27" iMac C2D
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Richmond,Va
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by nickw311
Maybe it is because the Mini uses the IBM PowerPC Chip... The more Minis sold = more IBM chips sold... they are looking out for numero uno
They have also been pumping in lots of money into Linux. It's a double hit for them.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Dangling something in the water… of the Arabian Sea
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Ambassadeur
Doh, who'd have thought that IBM would describe in detail how a mac mini is perfectly suitable to be used as a linux based multimedia system that can be controlled from another computer via a web browser interface...
IBM developerWorks
The article is on IBM's site, but the author isn't an IBM employee.
Originally Posted by Goldfinger
Does that mean that the 1.42 is an overclocked 1.25 ?
No it does not.
Originally Posted by nickw311
Maybe it is because the Mini uses the IBM PowerPC Chip... The more Minis sold = more IBM chips sold... they are looking out for numero uno
IBM doesn't make the Mac mini's G4. Freescale does.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Goldfinger
Does that mean that the 1.42 is an overclocked 1.25 ?
In this months issue of Macaddict they show how to overclock the Mini. There are like 5 different speeds from 1.25 to 1.58....1.42 being on of them. All you have to do is change some small SMD resistors. Honestly since its only $100 to go to the next speed (and get a bigger hard drive) I would not be the least bit surprised if thats what they did (for profit margins).
Of course the magazine goes on to show how to put a 7200 RPM drive and more memory in too....and I'm think can 1.50Ghz, 7200 RPM drive and 1Gb of memory comfortably run off of an 85 Watt supply? Maybe 
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Moderator 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Arizona
Status:
Offline
|
|
The 1.25GHz Mini uses 7447A1250s. The 1.42GHz Mini uses 7447A1420s. They are not overclocked.
|
|
I like chicken
I like liver
Meow Mix, Meow Mix
Please de-liv-er
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Admin Emeritus 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Goldfinger
Does that mean that the 1.42 is an overclocked 1.25 ?
Of course not. Nothing in the IBM statement indicates that in any way. Apple jumpers the motherboard to 1.25GHz when they put in a 1.25GHz CPU, and to 1.42GHz when they put in a 1.42GHz CPU. This is exactly the same thing that Apple has done since 1997 on every model that came in multiple speeds.
tooki
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Belgium
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Lateralus
The 1.25GHz Mini uses 7447A1250s. The 1.42GHz Mini uses 7447A1420s. They are not overclocked.
Right.
I just thought that they could be using 1 chip that is overclocked/downclocked to keep costs down, just one type of chip they need to buy.
|

iMac 20" C2D 2.16 | Acer Aspire One | Flickr
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: BFE
Status:
Offline
|
|
Who's to say the 1.25 isn't an underclocked 1.42?
|

I'm a bird. I am the 1% (of pets).
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Moderator 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Arizona
Status:
Offline
|
|
Why would Apple pay for and use a more expensive processor to underclock it? The 7447A comes out of Freescale rated at 1250 and 1420.
|
|
I like chicken
I like liver
Meow Mix, Meow Mix
Please de-liv-er
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Admin Emeritus 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Status:
Offline
|
|
Apple has underclocked in the past -- though not by much.
tooki
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
 |
Forum Rules
|
 |
 |
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|