 |
 |
Dual 1.8ghz : the original is the best?
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA.
Status:
Offline
|
|
I was wondering ...
Out of all of the Dual 1.8ghz revisions that have been available up until this point ...
wouldn't the original one be the best one?
are there any cons to that first version, versus all the updates since?
[it has 8 RAM slots instead of 4 on the rest]
??
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Moderator 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Arizona
Status:
Offline
|
|
Yes, it is still the most expandable of the Dual 1.8s. Only complaint I hear is that some models 'chirp'.
|
|
I like chicken
I like liver
Meow Mix, Meow Mix
Please de-liv-er
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA.
Status:
Offline
|
|
by 'chirp' do you mean the powersupply issue that affected audio streams via firewire?  ?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
I would say that you don't suffer anything in the updated version if you know that:
1. you will not need PCI-X slots
2. you know that you will not need more than 4GB of RAM.
|
|
Agent69
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: netherlands
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Agent69
I would say that you don't suffer anything in the updated version if you know that:
1. you will not need PCI-X slots
2. you know that you will not need more than 4GB of RAM.
of which 2. can be solved in the near future by using 2GB DIMMS (which are still insanely expensive but reported to work)
|
|
MacBook Pro 13"/2.66 (09/2010), Mac Mini c2d/1.83 (01/2008)
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Oct 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
I'm using one of the orgional 1.8 x2. I bought it the day it came out and never looked back. I did indstall a second HD, internal BT and 2 GB of ram, and upgraded the video card to ATI 9600.
I believe the only difference is the PCI X, Ram Slots and Front Side bus speed.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: netherlands
Status:
Offline
|
|
if you bought the original dual-1.8 you've probably got the best "bang for the buck" of any PM. the current midline model is still "only" 2.3 GHz, about a 30% speedup compared to the 1.8 without any additional features!
|
|
MacBook Pro 13"/2.66 (09/2010), Mac Mini c2d/1.83 (01/2008)
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: North Carolina
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Lateralus
Yes, it is still the most expandable of the Dual 1.8s. Only complaint I hear is that some models 'chirp'.
Don't let that stop you. I've got a June '04 dual 1.8, and it chips like a bitch. And by chirp, I mean the power supply chirping under processor load.
If it had more than 4 ram slots, I could put some of the extra ram I have laying around to use. I say go for the original model, if you can.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Apr 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
I want to respond to the "not need more than 4GB of memory..." a benefit of 8 slots is that... you have more slots.
1. You can buy smaller capacity sticks, which are sometimes cheaper than the bigger sticks (2x512 instead of 1x1GB)
2. You can upgrade you ram incrementally without having to replace modules. Have 2x512's now, later on add another 2x512s, another few years another 2.. blah blah
umm that's all the reasons.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: netherlands
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by lilrabbit129
I want to respond to the "not need more than 4GB of memory..." a benefit of 8 slots is that... you have more slots.
1. You can buy smaller capacity sticks, which are sometimes cheaper than the bigger sticks (2x512 instead of 1x1GB)
2. You can upgrade you ram incrementally without having to replace modules. Have 2x512's now, later on add another 2x512s, another few years another 2.. blah blah
umm that's all the reasons.
of course you're completely right, but even when buying 512MB sticks you get 2GB now - and when the 2GB sticks are readily available but 1GB sticks "cheap" and get a full 4GB. (or go beyond that by buying 2GB sticks). you loose flexibility compared to an 8-slot model but i prefer buying a new Mac instead of refurbished or second-hand. a 4-slot model may be all that the wallet permits 
|
|
MacBook Pro 13"/2.66 (09/2010), Mac Mini c2d/1.83 (01/2008)
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Apr 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
mousehouse: You are also absolutely correct. Cheers =)
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by t500
I'm using one of the orgional 1.8 x2. I bought it the day it came out and never looked back. I did indstall a second HD, internal BT and 2 GB of ram, and upgraded the video card to ATI 9600.
I believe the only difference is the PCI X, Ram Slots and Front Side bus speed.
I believe that both dual 1.8ghz G5s have a 900mhz FSB.
|
|
Agent69
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Oct 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
I believe only the fist 1.8 and Dual 1.8's (when they were the middle tier model) had the 900 mhz bus. When the model dropped to the lower tier they dropped with bus speeds along with the PCI X and 8gb ram limit....
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Smallish town in Ohio
Status:
Offline
|
|
I swear, the people that bought the original 2ghz dual g5s in august 2003...
2 years later and it's still an amazing ****ing machine. wtf is with that. 2 years and it hardly got old??
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
 |
Forum Rules
|
 |
 |
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|