Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Hardware - Troubleshooting and Discussion > Mac Desktops > P.A. Semi announces low power dual-core 2 GHz 64-bit PowerPC CPU

P.A. Semi announces low power dual-core 2 GHz 64-bit PowerPC CPU
Thread Tools
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Dangling something in the water… of the Arabian Sea
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 24, 2005, 09:16 AM
 
P.A. Semi Unveils Game-Changing Multicore Processor Family

The PWRficient processors address the multibillion-dollar high-performance embedded and computing markets to redefine power, cost, and throughput efficiency in high-performance processing. The unique system-on-chip architecture and design, underpinned by 50 patents filed and pending, delivers high performance (up to 2.5GHz per-core) at phenomenally low power consumption. In terms of performance per watt, the defining metric for all next- generation processors, PWRficient is up to 10 times superior to the competition. For example, the first PWRficient processor, a dual-core chip running at 2GHz, dissipates just 5-13 watts typical, depending upon the application.

I'm have no idea how good something like this would be for a Mac, because we have no real details yet. Too late for Macs though anyway.
(Last edited by Eug Wanker; Oct 24, 2005 at 09:25 AM. )
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: BFE
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 24, 2005, 11:20 AM
 
It would be nice for a mini.

I'm a bird. I am the 1% (of pets).
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 24, 2005, 11:28 AM
 
It could be like Cell... insanely high throughput (but lower power consumption) for embedded, but wholly unsuitable for general purprose desktop use.
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 24, 2005, 05:37 PM
 
Something to note: These chips aren't going to be out for a year.
2.0Ghz dualcore PPC in late 2006 (at the earliest) is OK if you're trying to keep up with Freescale ( ), but a little underwhelming for the rest of us.
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Dangling something in the water… of the Arabian Sea
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 24, 2005, 05:54 PM
 
The hype machine is on full tilt, but they estimate that when it does come out in a year, the SPECint performance will be 1100 per core and the SPECfp performance will be > 2200. I am skeptical, but that's way beyond what Freescale is forecasting. Freescale advertises low power and reasonable SPECint performance, but their SPECfp performance absotively sucks.

Mind you, despite their server claims, my bet is that these guys are targetting Freescale's market, and that is a big one.

BTW, these chips would compete against Intel's Merom (Yonah's 64-bit low power dual-core successor), in terms of time frame if they get them out in a year, but somehow I'm more inclined to believe in Intel's hype than P.A. Semi's even though Intel doesn't have a great track record either. (P.A. Semi has no track record whatsoever. However, they do have some good people in the fold apparently.)
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 24, 2005, 06:49 PM
 
Originally Posted by Eug Wanker
The hype machine is on full tilt, but they estimate that when it does come out in a year, the SPECint performance will be 1100 per core and the SPECfp performance will be > 2200. I am skeptical, but that's way beyond what Freescale is forecasting. Freescale advertises low power and reasonable SPECint performance, but their SPECfp performance absotively sucks.
The SPECfp performance is impressive, but you can already have that SPECint performance today in a 10W (maximum) Pentium M.
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Dangling something in the water… of the Arabian Sea
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 24, 2005, 11:56 PM
 
Originally Posted by mduell
The SPECfp performance is impressive, but you can already have that SPECint performance today in a 10W (maximum) Pentium M.
Indeed. Besides embedded though, it might be good for supercomputers, where floating point performance per watt is very important.

Anyways, we may learn more tomorrow, since the chip will be presented formally. In the meantime, let's have some cake:


     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:21 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2