 |
 |
Intel iMac test using XBench
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Tempe, AZ
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Status:
Offline
|
|
Is that using Rosetta, or the XBench native Intel app? If the latter, does it take advantage of SSE?
(Last edited by mduell; Jan 14, 2006 at 07:28 PM.
)
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Apr 2004
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by mduell
Is that using Rosetta, or a XBench a native Intel app? If the latter, does it take advantage of SSE?
XBench's website says it's a universal binary. I don't know about this SSE stuff...
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Status:
Offline
|
|
Sorry, my wording was poor. The first "a" should have been "the" and the second "a" should not have been there.
Was that benchmark done using the latest version (which is a Universal Binary), or an older version through Rosetta?
SSE is the SIMD unit on Intel CPUs; it's like Altivec on the G4 or VMX on the G5.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Apr 2004
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by mduell
Sorry, my wording was poor. The first "a" should have been "the" and the second "a" should not have been there.
Was that benchmark done using the latest version (which is a Universal Binary), or an older version through Rosetta?
SSE is the SIMD unit on Intel CPUs; it's like Altivec on the G4 or VMX on the G5.
thanks for the info on SSE...
if you'd taken time to actually READ the link that was presented, you'd notice that the xbench page with the results shows the version of xbench used in the test - 1.2, which, when you click on the version link above, brings you to the page that lists it as being a universal binary.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Tempe, AZ
Status:
Offline
|
|
I was at the Apple Store tonight and ran the XBench test on one of the Intel iMacs in the store. The results came out to be higher than the results in the link above. It was in the high 90s... for some reason I cannot seem to find the results on the XBench site. It is really badly organized. Argh!
Anyhow... the Intel iMac was very, very quick. I couldn't even tell that it was not running a PPC processor.
Nevermind... found it. Here is the link:
http://db.xbench.com/merge.xhtml?doc1=151337
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
 |
Forum Rules
|
 |
 |
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|