Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Hardware - Troubleshooting and Discussion > Mac Desktops > Mac mini Solo 2GB RAM vs. Mac mini Duo 512MB RAM?

Mac mini Solo 2GB RAM vs. Mac mini Duo 512MB RAM?
Thread Tools
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Mar 2005
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 30, 2006, 04:10 AM
 
Hello,

I hope I am not repeating an exisiting thread, but I am wondering is it better to purchase a Mac mini 1.5GHz Intel Core Solo with 2 GB RAM or 1.66GHz Intel Core Duo processor with 512 MB? In other words I am thinking about investing in the 2 GB RAM upgrade which will be around $200 versus buying the 1.66GHz Intel Core Duo. The extra 20 GB harddrive space and the Superdrive that the Core Duo has is not necessary for me to have.

Any thoughts? I have read over and over that the key for OS X is RAM not necessarily the processor.
(Last edited by yoosufzai; Mar 30, 2006 at 05:00 AM. )
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Los Angeles of the East
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 30, 2006, 11:39 AM
 
i personally would go with the core duo. pop in another 512mb for $30-$40 and live with 1gb until you could spring for two gigs. superdrive, more hard drive space, faster processor, and two processors is totally worth it in my eyes. there are people who say that the core solo is as fast as a core duo, and that the core duo is just marketing. if you use your computers for more than web, itunes, email, and word processing this is not the case, if you only do what i listed...you just might be better off with the core solo.

imho core solo with 2gb is on par with the core duo with only 1gb running universal apps. rosetta apps are another story and more ram will do you much better.
NOW YOU SEE ME! 2.4 MBP and 2.0 MBP (running ubuntu)
     
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Up In The Air
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 30, 2006, 11:44 AM
 
The truth is that more RAM always makes an impressive difference, especially below the 1GB threshold.

However, a faster processor with less RAM behaves much like a slower processor with more RAM for many non-intensive tasks (email/web/so forth)

I would say, if you intend to keep the machine for any length of time, get the better processor and add more RAM when RAM prices drop/go on sale.
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 30, 2006, 02:52 PM
 
The CPU is socketed, so it too can be upgraded.
Take the Solo with extra RAM.
     
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Up In The Air
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 30, 2006, 04:16 PM
 
Upgrading RAM doesn't violate warranty.

Upgrading processor will.
If this post is in the Lounge forum, it is likely to be my own opinion, and not representative of the position of MacNN.com.

     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 30, 2006, 05:09 PM
 
Originally Posted by vmarks
Upgrading RAM doesn't violate warranty.

Upgrading processor will.
Apple's list of CIPs hasn't been updated in quite a while. Do you know of a current list of parts that you're allowed to upgrade in each model without voiding your warranty?
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:16 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2