 |
 |
Worth getting a Raptor?
|
 |
|
 |
|
Senior User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Status:
Offline
|
|
Hey there
i currently have a 250gb drive in my Mac Pro and have roughly 70 gb of free space
im not sure if i should get a 150gb raptor drive or to go with a regular sata 7200rpm 500gb drive or perhaps a 750gb
how much of a difference will the raptor make?
and is it worth getting?
Thanks
|
|
R.I.P Steve Jobs
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
If you're hardcore and run tons of stuff at the same time which may access your system drive (I assume your raptor will be your system drive) then it might be worth while.
I run 15K SCSI stuff in my PC so using regular SATA 7200RPM drives is just torture. I've played with a Raptor and its not bad. I'd say its 85% as good as a 10K SCSI drive - regardless of what benchmarks show (which show it being faster but real world usage and feedback from the system say otherwise to me).
Still if I had to use SATA, then for sure my startup drive would be a raptor and my secondary drives where I store data would be 7200's
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Senior User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Status:
Offline
|
|
and in addition to this how easy is it to move your system drives to the new hdd?
how would you do that on a Mac Pro?
|
|
R.I.P Steve Jobs
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
I think Carbon Copy Cloner will do this - move one drives content to another.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
I would think a 500/750G "regular" sata drive is more useful then a slightly quicker 150G raptor drive in the long run
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: If I tellz ya, then I gotsta killz ya !
Status:
Offline
|
|
IF you use disk-intensive applications, it WILL make a difference in data access times, as well as faster booting and shutdown times when used as a boot drive. Otherwise, you have to look at your space requirements vs. price.
If you need BIG storage space, then obviously any of the 500-750GB, SATA II Seagates/Maxtors/WD's will provide that at a lower cost/GB than the raptor ever could. Look for one with 16mb of cache for a little more speed too...
And yes, CCC or SuperDuper will clone your existing HD to the new one really easily and quickly and with minimal fuss 
|
|
Signatures are ugly. Bitchy women are ugly......YOU do the math :)
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Germany
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by pcguy1
I would think a 500/750G "regular" sata drive is more useful then a slightly quicker 150G raptor drive in the long run
Actually, it's *not* only slightly quicker, which you can find out reading all the available tests for the 150GB Raptor drive. It's massively quicker.
For maximum speed use more than one Raptor in a RAID-0 configuration and an additional drive for data storage, should you need it.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Senior User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
R.I.P Steve Jobs
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Status:
Offline
|
|
Are you using your mac pro for video and/or audio? Then yes.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: If I tellz ya, then I gotsta killz ya !
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by mkerr64
Either drive would be fine, but you have to get the SATA model for use in a mac pro. Seagate is well known for their reliability, and their 5 year warrranty too
As for cost, you just have to shop around to find the best price, and TD is a goodplace to start, but check several other places before deciding where to get it from.
|
|
Signatures are ugly. Bitchy women are ugly......YOU do the math :)
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
 |
Forum Rules
|
 |
 |
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|