Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Hardware - Troubleshooting and Discussion > Mac Desktops > Is the 300GB Maxtor SATA drive inferior to the 500GB?

Is the 300GB Maxtor SATA drive inferior to the 500GB?
Thread Tools
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2006
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 30, 2007, 02:02 AM
 
I've got two 500GB SATA II Maxtors in my computer, which I love, but I need another hard drive to install Windows Vista on. I was looking at the 300GB Maxtor because it's only $64.95 at OWC, however, i'm not clear on whether it's as good as the 500GB drives. Is it SATA II? Is the only difference the capacity of the drive?

300GB Maxtor MaXLine III 7200RPM Enterprise Cl... (7L300S0) at OWC

Thanks!
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 30, 2007, 06:04 PM
 
It may be a tad slower for sustained transfers (if it's using lower density platters), but otherwise should be the same as the 500s.

Please don't use the phrase "SATA II"; it doesn't mean anything.
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2006
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 30, 2007, 09:48 PM
 
Originally Posted by mduell View Post
It may be a tad slower for sustained transfers (if it's using lower density platters), but otherwise should be the same as the 500s.

Please don't use the phrase "SATA II"; it doesn't mean anything.
Thanks. I won't be buying that one. What about this Hitachi? Judging by the price, it should be really good, right?

250GB Hitachi/IBM Deskstar T7K500 7200... (HDT725025VLA380) at OWC
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 30, 2007, 11:22 PM
 
Unfortunately grossly overpaying for a drive doesn't make it any faster. If you need high throughput, buy a high capacity drive or a smaller drive from a high capacity series (320GB from 7K1000 series is generally faster than 320GB from 7K320 series, adapt as appropriate for each brand numbering scheme).

If you're really worried about throughput, take this 320G Seagate perpendicular drive for $80.
Or since you seem to like 'enterprisey' drives, take this 400G Seagate NL35 for $80.

You can find max/min transfer rate benchmarks at storagereview.com
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2006
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 31, 2007, 02:25 AM
 
Originally Posted by mduell View Post
Unfortunately grossly overpaying for a drive doesn't make it any faster. If you need high throughput, buy a high capacity drive or a smaller drive from a high capacity series (320GB from 7K1000 series is generally faster than 320GB from 7K320 series, adapt as appropriate for each brand numbering scheme).

If you're really worried about throughput, take this 320G Seagate perpendicular drive for $80.
Or since you seem to like 'enterprisey' drives, take this 400G Seagate NL35 for $80.

You can find max/min transfer rate benchmarks at storagereview.com
Yeah... I have a couple of those Seagate drives, sitting on the shelf next to my computer. They have the firmware issue with the Mac Pro, that makes them run really slow, remember?

Also, there is no 7K1000 320GB drive.

Thanks for the help though! I guess it doesn't really matter too much.. it's just a drive for windows.
(Last edited by macgeek2005; Jul 31, 2007 at 02:32 AM. )
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 31, 2007, 08:53 PM
 
Originally Posted by macgeek2005 View Post
Yeah... I have a couple of those Seagate drives, sitting on the shelf next to my computer. They have the firmware issue with the Mac Pro, that makes them run really slow, remember?
So why haven't you updated the firmware? That issue was solved a long time ago.
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2006
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 31, 2007, 10:15 PM
 
Originally Posted by mduell View Post
So why haven't you updated the firmware? That issue was solved a long time ago.
It's not easy to update the firmware. It's tricky, dangerous, and not meant to be done by consumers. I've installed Vista on the original 160GB drive that came in the machine, which is 7200.9, so it doesn't have that issue. But I still need another drive now to act as the computers "original" drive.
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 1, 2007, 04:31 PM
 
Right, which is why you mail it in to Seagate to have it done if you're not very tech savvy. Give them a call to arrange the service.
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2006
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 1, 2007, 05:05 PM
 
Originally Posted by mduell View Post
Right, which is why you mail it in to Seagate to have it done if you're not very tech savvy. Give them a call to arrange the service.
Hmm, alright. I could do that. But right now those seagates are just being used as backups, so I don't really need it done.
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:35 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2