Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Hardware - Troubleshooting and Discussion > Mac Desktops > PC100 and PC133 SDRAM in G4 - Going to Go Kablooey?

PC100 and PC133 SDRAM in G4 - Going to Go Kablooey?
Thread Tools
Senior User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Aberdeen, UK
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 13, 2007, 03:55 PM
 
If I mix PC100 with PC133 SDRAM in a 500MHz G4 PowerMac, is it likely to go kablooey? I know that you can use 133 even though it's only technically rated at supporting 100, as the RAM 'falls back' to the lower speed, but will using two different speeds cause headaches and/or potential damage for the Mac?
     
Administrator
Join Date: May 2000
Location: California
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 13, 2007, 03:57 PM
 
You should be fine. All sticks will run at 100, assuming they have the proper speed settings for running at 100. If not, chances are you can fix it with DIMM First Aid from OS9.
     
Administrator
Join Date: May 2000
Location: California
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 13, 2007, 04:16 PM
 
Note: My above answer assumes your G4 requires PC100.

If your G4 requires PC133, then the 100 modules will not be recognized and there is nothing you can do to change that. Other than buy some PC133 (or faster) of course.
     
Senior User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Aberdeen, UK
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 13, 2007, 04:21 PM
 
Originally Posted by reader50 View Post
Note: My above answer assumes your G4 requires PC100.

If your G4 requires PC133, then the 100 modules will not be recognized and there is nothing you can do to change that. Other than buy some PC133 (or faster) of course.
The PM in question only requires PC100. I'm basically asking because it already has a 512MB PC100 DIMM in there, and I've come across a good seller on eBay that sells PC133s cheaper than I could get 100s new, and I'd hate to have to replace the existing 512MB running at 100 with a 512 @ 133.

Thanks for the really quick reply—much appreciated!
     
Administrator
Join Date: May 2000
Location: California
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 13, 2007, 04:33 PM
 
Be careful of 512 modules, the G4s are picky about them. You want low-density modules, preferably tested to work in Macs. The majority of PC 512 modules either don't work at all, or come up as 256 modules.
     
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Arizona
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 13, 2007, 04:49 PM
 
Originally Posted by reader50 View Post
Be careful of 512 modules, the G4s are picky about them. You want low-density modules, preferably tested to work in Macs. The majority of PC 512 modules either don't work at all, or come up as 256 modules.
Huh?

I have never heard of any such thing. And I've been through more Power Mac G4s with more RAM configurations than I could ever remember.
I like chicken
I like liver
Meow Mix, Meow Mix
Please de-liv-er
     
Administrator
Join Date: May 2000
Location: California
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 13, 2007, 06:08 PM
 
When Apple designed the G4 memory controller, 512 modules existed only as engineering samples. Apple made a guess at the maximum column count, and the maximum row count. These got designed into the G4's northbridge.

Several years later, when 512 MB modules became common, the industry had settled on a different column / row count in most modules, often referred to as "high density DIMMs". When one of these is plugged into an earlier G4, it will either not be recognized, or come up as a 256 module, depending on which way it's out of sync with what Apple designed for. This problem seems to be exclusive to 512 modules, 256's always seem to work.

This problem (being finickey with the 512 size) affects all of the PC100 G4s. It doesn't affect the Yikes, since that one only goes to 256 modules anyway. I'm not sure about the PC133 G4s.

I have run into this personally, buying a 512 generic PC stick once. It wouldn't recognize at all. Passed it on to a PC friend, it worked perfectly. Passed all tests. A low-density 512 module I bought later, spec'd to work in Macs, worked perfectly in my G4.
     
Senior User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Aberdeen, UK
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 13, 2007, 06:08 PM
 
Originally Posted by reader50 View Post
Be careful of 512 modules, the G4s are picky about them. You want low-density modules, preferably tested to work in Macs. The majority of PC 512 modules either don't work at all, or come up as 256 modules.
I'm with Lateralus on this one: I've heard of Macs being picky and not accepting memory, but I've never heard of them registering it at the wrong size. However, it's not going to be a problem as the eBay seller (scrumpymacs) pulls them from G4 systems anyway, so I know they'll work. They also have a seven-day money back guarantee, and I've dealt with them before, so I'm pretty confident.
     
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Arizona
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 13, 2007, 06:12 PM
 
Indeed. I have never had any such issues. And, as I said, I've been through enough early G4s and enough sticks of RAM to stock a computer parts warehouse.

While I have no doubt that there are a select few DIMMs that earlier Power Mac G4s will have issues with, it is not the norm. And certainly not the 'majority' as you eluded to.
I like chicken
I like liver
Meow Mix, Meow Mix
Please de-liv-er
     
Administrator
Join Date: May 2000
Location: California
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 13, 2007, 06:21 PM
 
I'm going to let others jump into this one, with their experiences, rather then argue. However, my description is correct. The majority of 512 modules sold at the time from PC-centric stores (like newegg or assorted RAM discount outlets) either would not function, or would not function at full size in the G4s. The more expensive brand-name 512s were somewhat more likely to work, and there was no problem in reverse. A 512 module that worked in a G4 would work in a PC.
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Salt Lake City, UT USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 13, 2007, 08:07 PM
 
This is my primary machine, listed in my sig. Sawtooth from early 2000.
2008 iMac 3.06 Ghz, 2GB Memory, GeForce 8800, 500GB HD, SuperDrive
8gb iPhone on Tmobile
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:45 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2