Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Hardware - Troubleshooting and Discussion > Mac Desktops > Nehalem Xeon Benchmarks: Ridiculously Fast

Nehalem Xeon Benchmarks: Ridiculously Fast
Thread Tools
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 21, 2008, 03:38 PM
 
Okay, I was wrong about the Intel defection. I guess it was the right thing to do. The Nahelm Xeon is being called ridiculously fast.

http://www.techradar.com/news/comput...hmarked-487131

"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
     
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 21, 2008, 07:47 PM
 
Originally Posted by Big Mac View Post
Okay, I was wrong about the Intel defection. I guess it was the right thing to do. The Nahelm Xeon is being called ridiculously fast.

http://www.techradar.com/news/comput...hmarked-487131
Wait! Don't sell out! You were my inspiration!
10.7.1 on Mac Pro 8x2.8
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: yes
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 21, 2008, 07:55 PM
 
Next up: realization you were wrong with your Republican defection!
     
Eug
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Caught in a web of deceit.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 21, 2008, 11:33 PM
 


----

I'll probably get a new iMac when I can get it with a quad-core Clarksfield. I don't think it will have QuickPath though.
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Dec 2000
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 21, 2008, 11:51 PM
 
Originally Posted by Big Mac View Post
Okay, I was wrong
Who are you, and what have you done with Big Mac?

Ticking sound coming from a .pkg package? Don't let the .bom go off! Inspect it first with Pacifist. Macworld - five mice!
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: in front of my Mac
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 22, 2008, 04:04 AM
 
Originally Posted by Eug View Post
I'll probably get a new iMac when I can get it with a quad-core Clarksfield. I don't think it will have QuickPath though.
No, it won't. Intel's mobile CPUs and chipsets won't use QP. Instead they'll have this.

     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Automatic
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 22, 2008, 12:10 PM
 
Originally Posted by CharlesS View Post
Who are you, and what have you done with Big Mac?



"That plane's dustin' crops where there ain't no crops."
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: in front of my Mac
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 22, 2008, 02:26 PM
 
Seconded.

Now let me go back to waiting for the Power Book G5.
     
Eug
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Caught in a web of deceit.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 22, 2008, 03:59 PM
 
Where have you been?

     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: in front of my Mac
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 23, 2008, 01:56 AM
 
If you tore the screen off of that you might actually have an xMac.
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 23, 2008, 12:46 PM
 
For better or for worse SPEC released a new benchmark in 2006 so direct comparisons between the G5s and Nehalem aren't possible using published figures, but a comparison can be made by using the original Mac Pros as an intermediate.

Core i7 quad @ 3.2Ghz:
SPECint2006rate: 124
SPECfp2006rate: 86.1
Expect the new Mac Pro to approximately double those rate figures, as the site OreoCookie linked to stated.

Xeon 5100 quad @ 3.0Ghz:
SPECint2006rate: 68.9
SPECfp2006rate: 48.1
SPECint2000rate: 123
SPECfp2000rate: 83.4

G5 quad @ 2.5Ghz:
SPECint2000rate: 67.5
SPECfp2000rate: 58.8

So from the quad G5 from late 2005 to the 8 core Nehalem of early 2009 we're up 6.5x for integer performance and 5x for floating point performance. At about the same system price that's integer performance doubling every 14 months and floating point performance doubling every 17 months.
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:13 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2