 |
 |
imac game ram
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Mar 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
my son and i are the proud, new owners of an imac i5 27". it is in the standard, 4gb, 1g 5750 configuration as we bought it from amazon.com.
the question here is, would there be a performance increase if we added ram above the standard 4gb when playing games like world of warcraft? we know that osx is memory hungry, but think 4gb is plenty. ram is pretty cheap so wondering if adding more might help performance.
thanks in advance.
ps. going from 2 to 4 gb in our old windows amd 630, nvidia 5770 1gb box made no noticeable change in WOW, which is CPU hungry as opposed to GPU hungry...
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator  Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Status:
Offline
|
|
More RAM never hurts, but for WOW 4 gigs is probably fine. 8 gigs will not be a significant boost.
|
|
The low-end Mac Pro is the most overpriced Mac since the IIvx
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
blabba5555555555555555555555555555555555555
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Cape Cod, MA
Status:
Offline
|
|
The RAM for that machine will never be cheaper than it is now. Max it out.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: France
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by gangster 
we know that osx is memory hungry, but think 4gb is plenty. ram is pretty cheap so wondering if adding more might help performance.
Care to back up that statement? Snow Leopard works fine on my four year old MacBook with 2G.
|
|
XBL : Ze Veteran
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by mattyb
Care to back up that statement? Snow Leopard works fine on my four year old MacBook with 2G.
Snow Leopard runs ok on a 4 year old MacBook with 2GB. It would run better if you could install 4GB though. Assuming you do lots of things at once.
|
|
MacBook 2.0GHz CD; MacBook Pro 15" 2.4GHz Late '08; PowerMac G4 MDD Dual 1GHz; 3x Xserve G4 1GHz; Mac Mini 2GHz; Big pile of broken and working bits;
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Belgium/France
Status:
Offline
|
|
I have two old Mac Minis running Snow Leopard, a 1.83 GHz Core Duo with 1GB RAM and a 1.66 GHz Core duo model with 2 GB RAM. With one programme open the faster 1.83 model is a little snappier, but when two or more (especially Office) applications are open, then the supposedly slower 1.66 model is noticeably faster and better able to cope.
I also have a Hackintosh Lenovo S-10 which runs Snow Leopard really well with its "puny" Atom and 2 GB RAM, but that will be retired now as I have the new MacBook Air 11" with 4 GB RAM which runs like a dream. Neither are being used for gaming though. If RAM is cheap I would max out.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top
