Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Hardware - Troubleshooting and Discussion > Mac Notebooks > 1GHz vs. 1.25GHz Processors

1GHz vs. 1.25GHz Processors
Thread Tools
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 20, 2003, 06:58 PM
 
Hello,

I'm new to the list and haven't had the pleasure of owning my own Mac as of yet. (I'm envious of my father's Mac and also my friend's 17"PB with all the trimmings.) I'm going to buy a 15" PB and have worked with and tweeked the pricing as much as I'm able to for the best deal.

After all was said and done, I could have a 15"PB with a combo-drive, 60G hard drive, 512M RAM, backlit keyboard and either a 1GHz G4 or a 1.25GHz G4. The difference would be about $185.00 after local govt. discounts and small tweaks like buying extra RAM from another company for less money, etc.

Question: is a 1.25 GHz G4 $185.00 better than the 1GHz G4? What kind of performance increase will I see in the 1.25GHz over the other?

Thanks in advance,
Zatt
     
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 20, 2003, 07:33 PM
 
dude, this is a no brainer. get the 1.25.

I've got the 1Ghz, and I only wish I had enough to get the 1.25. for 185 more, you are getting a steal. The 1.25 performs about 20% faster on most things.

Do it, now. For me the price difference was 500.
http://www.****microsoft.com - "Free your mind, and your OS will follow"
     
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: somewhere between point A and point B
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 20, 2003, 07:34 PM
 
I've actually ordered my 15" PB recently and opted to go with the 1.25Ghz model. I was mainly thinking about paying the extra now for the extra processing power rather than regretting it later. I found this one linke from macworld detailing that the 1.25Ghz is just a hair faster than the 1Ghz model (in terms of seconds). But if I had the choice I would probably think about investing the money into the 80GB hard drive@5400rpm (a custom order from the Apple website) than deciding on an extra 250Mhz of speed. I figure the extra boost in HD will make things realistically faster (i.e. games, bootup, video editing/encoding). Anyways, congrats on your upcoming PB, can't wait for mine to ship
     
Zatt  (op)
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 20, 2003, 09:13 PM
 
Hmm... Looks like the votes are in. I'll spend the extra money. Thank you.
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Oakland, CA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 21, 2003, 01:45 AM
 
Yeah Zatt, if I had a chance I think I would've opted for the faster HD like newmanium said.

Congratulations on the new Mac.
     
Senior User
Join Date: Dec 2000
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 21, 2003, 02:21 AM
 
I'd choose MHz, which will speed up just about evrything, over HD rpm, which will only speed up some things. Oversimplified, but that was my conclusion.
     
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jun 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 21, 2003, 04:02 AM
 
also...alot harder to upgrade cpu than hd...
     
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Globetrotting
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 21, 2003, 06:53 AM
 
I pondered the same thing and bought the 1Ghz, SD, AE, Lit KB. Between 3rd Party Ram (768MB total) and Tax I saved $235. I had to pinch every penny but you should always get the most power you can afford.
If a group of mimes are miming a forest and one falls down, does he make a sound?
     
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Atlanta
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 21, 2003, 07:15 AM
 
1GHz vs. 1.25GHz will only be faster in things where you render. Normal use, clicking around on the UI, none of that stuff will be all that much faster.

I had a dual450 and a dual800. The dual800 was only faster when I rendered things out of After Effects or C4d. Otherwise I could barely tell the difference, if at all.
MacBook Pro C2D 2.16GHz 2GB 120GB OSX 10.4.9, Boot Camp 1.2, Vista Home Premium
mac mini 1.42, 60GB 7200rpm, 1GB (sold), dual 2GHz/G5 (sold), Powerbook 15" 1GHz (sold)
dual G4 800MHz (sold), dual G4 450MHz (sold), G4 450MHz (sold), Powerbook Pismo G3 500MHz (sold)
PowerMac 9500 132MHz 601, dual 180MHz 604e, Newer G3 400MHz (in closet)
Powermac 7100 80MHz (sold), Powermac 7100 66MHz (sold)
     
Zatt  (op)
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 21, 2003, 07:53 AM
 
Thank you all for the speed of your responses! I didn't think that I would get so much so fast.
     
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 21, 2003, 08:04 AM
 
I got the 1.25 with the 80 5400 HD...smooooth. Do it, and get the SD while you're at it.
15" 1.25/512/80/5400/SD/AE Aluminum Powerbook
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:55 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2