 |
 |
Pismo and Virtual PC
|
 |
|
 |
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Los Angeles, Ca,
Status:
Offline
|
|
Hey All
I'm looking to get Virtual PC for my Pismo 400(firewire). Was wondering if any of you have this working on your Pismo.
I need this to run a Mapping program thats for an WinXP machine.
Thanks!!!
Brad
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Senior User
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
Trust me, trying to emulate WinXP on a Pismo400 will be like wading through treacle... in winter! You'd be much better off getting one of those bargain basement PCs, especially if you already have a monitor hanging around.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Moderator Emeritus 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Illinois
Status:
Offline
|
|
Well, it's usable, especially if you use it in OS 9. But it won't be fast. Or anything close to fast. Windows XP is particularly slow.
One possibility is to try getting a G4 upgrade for your machine. Or (better yet) get a new PowerBook.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2004
Status:
Offline
|
|
See if you can get a copy of VPC4 and run it in OS9 with Windows 2000. It runs about as fast on your machine as VPC5-6 does on a 800Mhz G4 under OSX. Things have slowed down in terms of general usage.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Garden of Paradise Motel, Suite 3D
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by RonnieoftheRose:
See if you can get a copy of VPC4 and run it in OS9 with Windows 2000. It runs about as fast on your machine as VPC5-6 does on a 800Mhz G4 under OSX. Things have slowed down in terms of general usage.
Right. If you get an older copy of VPC, and run in 9 with lots of RAM, it will work fine for most things.
but forget running VPC with XP on a Pismo without a processor upgrade -- it's impossibly slow.
|
|
He can be fixed -- you can't.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
What mapping program? I used to run ArcGIS 3 on my old 1 ghz 15" within Virtual PC, and it was frustratingly slow. It was unusable. I currently run ArcGIS 8 on a Pentium 4 machine, and when I really want to run the program on my PB (1.5 ghz 15"), I use Microsoft Remote Desktop Connection to hijack the Windows machine remotely. As others have said, you'd be better off by using a real PC for mapping.
K-Bat
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
 |
Forum Rules
|
 |
 |
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |