Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Hardware - Troubleshooting and Discussion > Mac Notebooks > advantage/disadvantage of ibook 12 over pb12?

advantage/disadvantage of ibook 12 over pb12?
Thread Tools
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: GTA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 12, 2005, 05:32 PM
 
Hello all,
I am not a computer expert, so looking at the spec. sheet on apple site doesn't quite connect.

since the CPU between the two seems not much, and all the features are very similar. I wonder besides the built-material, what advantage (and paying more) of getting a PB12 rather than ibook12?

I still can install wifi, bluetooth, upgrade ram, etc. I wonder if PB12 video card is much superior than the ibook's?

Thanks in advance for your advise.
     
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Dec 2004
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 12, 2005, 09:18 PM
 
power book is/has a:
lighter
smaller
better screen
better graphics card
slightly faster CPU
slightly faster FSB
better keyboard (not much a difference IMO)
dual moniters (can be hacked with firmware on ibook apparently) and ability to run on an external moniter with the lid closed

the ibook is supposed to have better wifi, the battery life is better, the casing is more durable, and it costs less.
     
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Dec 2004
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 12, 2005, 10:21 PM
 
Originally posted by afireinside:
power book is/has a:
lighter
smaller
better screen
better graphics card
slightly faster CPU
slightly faster FSB
better keyboard (not much a difference IMO)
dual moniters (can be hacked with firmware on ibook apparently) and ability to run on an external moniter with the lid closed

the ibook is supposed to have better wifi, the battery life is better, the casing is more durable, and it costs less.
the screens on the 12" ibook and powerbook are exactly same.
     
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: GTA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 12, 2005, 11:30 PM
 
if not playing 3d games, do the video cards perform much differently? will we notice slow refresh using mails/safari and office apps?

if I add up to 1G ram, will it make the ibook on par with PB, performance wise?

sorry, one more question. for ibook, which 7200rpm disk you recommend? is it user replaceable?

thanks for all your input.
     
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 13, 2005, 01:56 AM
 
     
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Dec 2004
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 13, 2005, 07:15 AM
 
If the screen is the same why did people tell me the PB had a better screen on three different forums?

And if your not gaming the ibook and pb will be about the same for every day stuff.
     
Forum Regular
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Doylestown, PA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 13, 2005, 09:41 AM
 
The wireless signal on the ibook is better then the powerbooks. I always had an extra bar over my friends with powerbooks.
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Los Angeles of the East
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 13, 2005, 11:03 AM
 
(cheerleader voice)

gimme a S
gimme a E
gimme a A
gimme a R
gimme a C
gimme a H

What's that spell!!!!! SEARCH! SEARCH!! SEARCH!!! YAY!!!!!!!!

(end cheerleader voice)
NOW YOU SEE ME! 2.4 MBP and 2.0 MBP (running ubuntu)
     
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Antonio TX USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 13, 2005, 12:51 PM
 
Originally posted by afireinside:
If the screen is the same why did people tell me the PB had a better screen on three different forums?

And if your not gaming the ibook and pb will be about the same for every day stuff.
Because of the better video subsystem; it has a "better graphics card" as noted above. I can't remember if it's just that it has a faster/newer GPU, or that it has more video RAM, or maybe both.
Glenn -----
OTR/L, MOT, Tx
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Los Angeles of the East
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 13, 2005, 01:55 PM
 
More VRAM on the Powerbook (64 compared to 32) and the Nvidia is compatable with Corel Image on Tiger, so in that sense the PB GPU is better even though it's an old chip.
NOW YOU SEE ME! 2.4 MBP and 2.0 MBP (running ubuntu)
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Berkeley, CA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 13, 2005, 05:13 PM
 
i'll be joining the ibook user ranks later tonight as i pickup the entry level ibook (to replace my aging pismo) from the apple store. for me, it's a value-conscious decision and for what you get, it's a good price. to pay an additional $600 on a 12" combo drive powerbook for what i see are only marginal improvements over the 12" ibook is just not worth it to me at this point in time.

if you're buying for value get an iBook. otherwise, get a powerbook.

Liberty - Free Markets - Peace
     
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: The O.C.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 13, 2005, 08:46 PM
 
Originally posted by donniedarko:
the screens on the 12" ibook and powerbook are exactly same.
not true. check the threads, there is a side by side comparison so you can see for yourself. check my sig; i know firsthand.

the PB is sharper and brighter, much higher in overall quality. you really have to put 2 (new) units side by side to see the difference.

MacBook 2.4GHz Intel Core 2 Duo | Clamshell iBook G3 366MHz | 22" Cinema Display | iPod Mini | iPod shuffle | AirPort Express | Mighty Mouse
     
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Antonio TX USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 13, 2005, 08:52 PM
 
Originally posted by teknopimp:
not true. check the threads, there is a side by side comparison so you can see for yourself. check my sig; i know firsthand.

the PB is sharper and brighter, much higher in overall quality. you really have to put 2 (new) units side by side to see the difference.
Are you absolutely certain that the difference is not in the video card? Considering the difference in cards (as was pointed out above), I think it's easily possible for the same display to look significantly different on the different graphics engines.

No, I don't have a PB handy to compare, and I haven't seen both taken apart to check part numbers. But considering the much better video capabilities of the PB, I think that the folks above who say it's the same display are correct.
Glenn -----
OTR/L, MOT, Tx
     
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: california
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 13, 2005, 10:26 PM
 
PowerBook or iBook has been done to death! At this point it just seems like a vicious cycle. Any how there are tons of threads like this on this very forum. As noted above try a SEARCH.
Bless those that sacrifice for us all.
     
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: great northwest
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 13, 2005, 11:47 PM
 
Originally posted by afireinside:
If the screen is the same why did people tell me the PB had a better screen on three different forums?
.
Maybe they were referring to the 15" and 17" Powerbooks, which do have higher resolutions and therefore look sharper than the 12" Powerbook or iBook? I've had both 12" Powerbook and 12" iBook, and I didn't see much difference between the screens.
     
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Dec 2004
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 14, 2005, 12:24 PM
 
Originally posted by GHPorter:
Are you absolutely certain that the difference is not in the video card? Considering the difference in cards (as was pointed out above), I think it's easily possible for the same display to look significantly different on the different graphics engines.

No, I don't have a PB handy to compare, and I haven't seen both taken apart to check part numbers. But considering the much better video capabilities of the PB, I think that the folks above who say it's the same display are correct.
Uh the difference between an FX5200 and a 9200 wouldent affect the image quality of 2D at all.
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:53 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2