 |
 |
High Capacity Battery for 12" PB
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
Just seen this on the MacNN homepage, apparently OWC/Newer Technology have started selling these high capacity batteries for the 12" powerbooks:
http://eshop.macsales.com/item/Newer...y/BAP12AL4800/
What do people think? Anyone have any experience with their high capacity batteries for other powerbooks? My housemate and I are tempted to order a pair, as our batteries for our powerbooks are both in need of replacement. Any feedback would be appreciated!
|
|
12" Rev B PB
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: WV, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
I'd say go for it. I've had nothing but good times w/ MacSales...they're solid.
My normal 12" PB battery gets astounding battery life, but if it were in need of a replacement then you might as well get the high-capicity so long as it has some sort of warranty attached to it. 
|
|
5G 60GB video iPod
512MB iPod Shuffle
Westone UM1 Canalphones
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
Thanks for the tip. Will probably go for it, unless I hear any horror stories. It works out only fractionally more expensive than buying the standard batteries from Apple, due to the favourable £/$ conversion rate.
|
|
12" Rev B PB
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Washington, DC
Status:
Offline
|
|
At 139.99 it's exactly $10 more than Apple's price. So no matter where you live it's a good deal considering the capacity. However, even though my battery is starting to give me significantly less battery life (down to 1:35 or so), I hate the thought of spending that much on a machine that's over two years old. I'd rather sell my machine and spend a tiny bit more than the price of a battery, and be able to get a newer powerbook - maybe a rev c.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Oct 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
costs 7% more than Apple's replacement battery
has 6% longer life in theory (53 watt hours vs 50 watt hours)
not sure that's a good deal, but if the quality is as good or better than Apple's then a little extra battery time for $10 can't hurt.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Feb 2004
Status:
Offline
|
|
I'd be worried about the fit and the possible wobble it could cause.
|
|
12.1" Powerbook G4
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by jlgrandam
I'd be worried about the fit and the possible wobble it could cause.
I must admit that had crossed my mind too.
If I'm honest though, I very rarely use it on a hard surface without an external keyboard. If I use the built-in keyboard, then it's normally on my lap, so I could live with a slight wobble.
|
|
12" Rev B PB
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Senior User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
how much more significant is 11%.. doesnt seem like much. they tested the battery with a 867mhz powerbook? i have a 1.67. wouldnt that affect battery life as well?
|
|
15" Powerbook G4 | 1.67, 1.5gb, 128VRAM, SD
20" iMac | 2.66, 2gb, HD 2600
Dell 2408WFP
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Kansas City, Mo
Status:
Offline
|
|
I was going to buy a new battery this week but my Powerbook is still not back from applecare. (Hard drive died and now they are waiting on a screen bezel part on backorder. 2 more weeks to wait!)
Can't really tell if this battery is that much better. They say 13% improvement. That could be about 20-25 minutes on a new battery don't you think? Not much but could be worth it. I am going to check into shipping and tax cost.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Sep 2004
Status:
Offline
|
|
11% more battery life... thats 11 minutes more per hour. I get around 4 hours now, so I should get about 4:40 with that new one. Extras 40 minutes might be owrth a battery buy.
PS. Stats are with screen brightness on low doing daily tasks like surfing, emailing, admin-ing.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
Actually, 11% more is 11% of 60 per hour--or 6 minutes, 40 seconds more per hour.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Kansas City, Mo
Status:
Offline
|
|
So on a 4 hour battery that is about 25 minutes.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Atlanta, GA
Status:
Offline
|
|
25 minutes is significant. I'd also be curious about it's performance on a 1.67 machine. I want to use it for trans-oceanic flights where I need 2-3 batteries for the crossing.
|
|
- iMac 3.2Ghz 1TB - MacBook Pro 15" Core i7 2.3Ghz / 256SSD (Work laptop)
- PowerMac G5 - Dual 2.0 Ghz, 3GB, Soundsticks!,
- Lenovo Thinkpad T510 (also a work laptop), Win 7 Enterprise, 8GB, 320GB HDD
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
who gets 4 hours continuous use on a battery? If unplugged fully charged, it tells me I have 2.5 hours. But I am lucky to get 2 hours continuous use on battery. Most of the time only about 1.5 hours anymore. That is only about an extra 9-10 minutes.
$13.99 per minute? I don't think so... that is too high of an opportunity cost.
|
|
The only thing necessary for evil to flourish is for good men to do nothing
- Edmund Burke
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
 |
Forum Rules
|
 |
 |
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|