 |
 |
extra ram vs cpu
|
 |
|
 |
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Jul 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
hey everyone,
i'm planning on making the switch to mac in the fall (15" powerbook). I'm pondering these two options, a 15" 1.5 GHZ w/ combo drive and RAM upgrade to 1GB, or a 15" 1.67GHZ sans the superdrive with the 512MB that comes standard. What would you recommend, I'm looking for this computer to be as fast as possible, ie. as little like the PC I own now; I'm so sick of it stalling and taking forever to load ( am i just being paranoid about the speed of these things?). This computer will be mostly used for Word processing, listening to music, and powerpoint and PDF lecture files. Any other recommendations (around $2550 Cdn w/ education discount) would be much appreciated.
Thankx!
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Los Angeles of the East
Status:
Offline
|
|
the cpu difference between these two computers is hardly an issue...i'd say go with the 1.5 with added RAM, 512MB is the minimum nowadays. if it were me though...i'd get the 1.67 and run it stock for a couple months untill i saved enough for a 1G stick...then you'd have the best of both worlds.
|
NOW YOU SEE ME! 2.4 MBP and 2.0 MBP (running ubuntu)
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Northern Tier of PA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Take the faster processor and upgrade the RAM yourself. RAM is cheap and it is easy to install. Or you could get the slower processor without the RAM and spend the extra on the superdrive and ram.
|
|
"The day Microsoft makes something that doesn't suck is probably the day they start making vacuum cleaners."
- Ernst Jan Plugge
MacBook Pro 2.33GHzDC 3GB RAM
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: May 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
Ok, do you really need the Superdrive? If not, Id go with the 1.5 with the ram upgrade. You will notice that more so than if had the 1.67. And I wouldnt buy your ram through Apple, its too expensive. Buy it through a third party and install it yourself.
Josh
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Status:
Offline
|
|
A 1.5 GHz G4 with 1 GB of RAM will probably be faster in day-to-day operation than a 1.67 GHz with only 512 MB.
By the way, upgrading to 1 GB from the standard 512 MB should only cost you about $50. That's all it costs to buy a 512 MB RAM module these days. Don't buy your RAM from Apple... it's a HUGE rip off. They routinely charge 3x more than even the premium RAM vendors (like Crucial).
|
"That's Mama Luigi to you, Mario!" *wheeze*
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: May 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
By the way, upgrading to 1 GB from the standard 512 MB should only cost you about $50.
Are you saying 1g is $50 or an additional 512 is $50?
|
|
PB12 / 1.5 / 80 / 1.25 / SD
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
"That's Mama Luigi to you, Mario!" *wheeze*
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Atlanta
Status:
Offline
|
|
You won't feel any difference between the 1.5 and 1.67.
The only real reason to get the 1.67 is to get the 128MB video card.
|
|
MacBook Pro C2D 2.16GHz 2GB 120GB OSX 10.4.9, Boot Camp 1.2, Vista Home Premium
mac mini 1.42, 60GB 7200rpm, 1GB (sold), dual 2GHz/G5 (sold), Powerbook 15" 1GHz (sold)
dual G4 800MHz (sold), dual G4 450MHz (sold), G4 450MHz (sold), Powerbook Pismo G3 500MHz (sold)
PowerMac 9500 132MHz 601, dual 180MHz 604e, Newer G3 400MHz (in closet)
Powermac 7100 80MHz (sold), Powermac 7100 66MHz (sold)
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Hyrule
Status:
Offline
|
|
Get the 1.5 and the extra ram, unless you're gonna be driving a 30" the 128mb VRAM is unnecessary...
Plus the Matshita 835 is a lousy superdrive. There's a whole thread here dedicated to that, and whether you get a matshita 845 or not is hit or miss. Back when I was ordering I wanted to do a BTO 17" with 80gb drive (didn't want the 100 at all), and couldn't wait that long, didn't care for superdrive roulette so the 15" 1.67 wasn't worth it and nor was the extra 167mhz in speed to me ... sooo yeah
The 1.5ghz is pretty darn snappy anyway 
|
|
Aloha
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Senior User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Chillicothe, OH
Status:
Offline
|
|
def go with the 1.5
the 1.67 is just a waste at this point of time save youur pennies
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
 |
Forum Rules
|
 |
 |
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|