 |
 |
RAM Frequently Asked Questions (Page 5)
|
 |
|
 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kentucky
Status:
Offline
|
|
Almost pulled the trigger just now but its out-of-stock. Signed-up for them to email mail me when it gets available :-(
|
|
24" iMac 2.8 C2Ext,15" MBPro 2.2 C2D,20" iMac 2.0 G5,12" iBook 1.2 G4
8 GB iPhone, 60GB 5th Gen iPod, 20 GB 3rd Gen iPod
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Plainfield, IL
Status:
Offline
|
|
I just upgraded to 4GB of RAM for my Nov. 2007 MacBook. It was at least $30 cheaper than Crucial.com (my standby for purchasing RAM for my work's Macs/PCs), and $20 or more cheaper than OWC at newegg.com. Got the Kingston RAM...no issues at all so far.
Am not really seeing a "huge" difference from the 2GB I had, but I have noticed that with Mail, Safari, Transmit, iChat, iTunes, iPhoto, Pages and Fusion (XP) running simultaneously I've yet to see a page out to the HDD. Perhaps that's improvement enough...and am not sorry I spent the extra bucks for the upgrade.
|
|
-White MacBook 2.2GHz 120GB, 4GB RAM; iBook G4 1.2GHz 30GB, 1.25GB RAM
-5G white iPod + video 30GB; & original U2 iPod 20GB mono; 8GB iPhone (Contour iSee v3)
-...oh, and a PC too.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chicago Suburb
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Bearsfan34
I just upgraded to 4GB of RAM for my Nov. 2007 MacBook. It was at least $30 cheaper than Crucial.com (my standby for purchasing RAM for my work's Macs/PCs), and $20 or more cheaper than OWC at newegg.com. Got the Kingston RAM...no issues at all so far.
Am not really seeing a "huge" difference from the 2GB I had, but I have noticed that with Mail, Safari, Transmit, iChat, iTunes, iPhoto, Pages and Fusion (XP) running simultaneously I've yet to see a page out to the HDD. Perhaps that's improvement enough...and am not sorry I spent the extra bucks for the upgrade.
currently crucial is liek $13 more expensive than owc..not sure about newegg tho
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Jan 2007
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
------------------------------------------------------------------
G4 400Mhz | QuadCore PC Workstation
MBP Coming Soon!
------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oouston, TX
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by XTTX
G.Skill is pretty bad in my experience and the quicker timings don't really buy you anything. There's no reason to buy laptop RAM with heatsinks.
|
|
Mac update estimates:
MacBook Pro mid 3Q08 (Cantiga, 2.5-2.8Ghz); MacBook early-mid 4Q08 (Cantiga-G, 2.4-2.5Ghz); MacBook Air late 3Q08 (45nm); Mac Pro/Xserve mid-late 4Q08 (3+Ghz Nehalem); iMac early 1Q09 (Cantiga, 2.8-3.33Ghz, maybe quad option); Mac mini early 3Q08 (Crestline-G, 2.1-2.4Ghz 45nm).
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: in front of my Mac
Status:
Offline
|
|
From here
Corsair Low Latency memory for Apple laptops. We are continuing our testing this weekend with our MacBook Pro 2.6GHz "Penryn" but so far the advantage of the CAS 4 memory over the "normal" CAS 5 memory is averaging 1.3% in our various real world tests which include Photoshop CS3, Compressor 3, After Effects CS3, and QuickTime Encoding. Corsair's claimed 19% Photoshop advantage is requiring "suspension of disbelief."
|
|
My Macs: 128, 512, Plus, SE, SE/30, IIsi, IIci, PowerBook 100, Quadra 700, LC 475, Performa 630, Power Mac 7100, PowerBook G3 Lombard, iMac DV+, Power Mac G4 MDD, Ti PowerBook G4, 17" iMac G4, 12" PowerBook G4 1GHz, 12" PowerBook G4 1.5GHz, Mac mini G4 1.5GHz, 15" PowerBook G4 1.67GHz, 13" MacBook (black), 15" MacBook Pro 2.0GHz, 15" MacBook Pro 2.33GHz with 20" ACD, 15" MacBook Pro 2.4GHz with 23" ACD
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Status:
Offline
|
|
I have the older MacBook Pro 2.33Ghz (MA610LL) that has a 3GB RAM limit. Does anyone know if I put in two 2GB sticks of RAM, whether or not my MacBook Pro will recognize that as 3GB and whether or not that is a good idea.
The reason I ask is I have two Mushkin 2GB sticks of ram lying around and I read that it is better to put in the same brand of ram in a computer instead of mixing and matching.
Bottom line, should I:
1. Keep one stick of Apple 1GB ram and put in one stick of Mushkin 2GB ram?
or
2. Take out the Apple ram and put in two sticks of Mushkin 2GB ram?
Thank you.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Mar 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
Hello!
There's a sticky at the top of this notebook section that will help you: http://forums.macnn.com/69/mac-noteb...s/#post3636546
There, Simon posts:
Although you can install 2x2GB RAM in the early C2D MacBook Pro for a total of 4GB, the chipset has an addressing limitation of 3GB.
This is not something software, the OS or firmware could change - it is an inherent limitation of this Intel chipset. If you install 4GB in an early C2D MacBook Pro the system will recognize the total amount of RAM, but you actually won't be able to use the last GB.
Unless 2x2GB is cheaper (or more easily available) than an unmatched 3GB, there is no reason to install more than 3 GB in an early C2D MBP.
In your situation, I guess that if you have nowhere else to put those RAM sticks, then I'm sure they'll enjoy being in a MacBook Pro 
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Moderator 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Ismailovski Market
Status:
Online
|
|
I've moved the two posts above to this thread, where the OP's question belongs.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
 |
Forum Rules
|
 |
 |
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |