Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Hardware - Troubleshooting and Discussion > Mac Notebooks > Macbook pro 15 -> Macbook air

Macbook pro 15 -> Macbook air
Thread Tools
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 17, 2008, 04:28 PM
 
Hi,

Seeing the new Macbook air, I am really tempted in buying it, replacing my 1 year and a half macbook pro 15" 2.16 C2D.

Considering that I can sell the MBP on eBay for around £600 - £800 its not a huge cash outlay.

I travel relatively frequently, but the size of the MBP has never bothered me when I cary it around. Its primary use is for movies on the train/internet + emails.

Before the MBP I used to own a 14.1" Vaio and the less weight + smaller size were quite welcome and convenient though...

Thoughts?
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 17, 2008, 05:32 PM
 
Go for it. 15" laptops are too big for portability IMO.
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Yamanashi, Japan
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 17, 2008, 07:50 PM
 
If you need the portability, why not.

Just be sure that you're willing to forgo a graphics card, Optical drive, and firewire before you buy. If you're cool with that, go for it.
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 17, 2008, 08:20 PM
 
Originally Posted by JoshuaZ View Post
If you need the portability, why not.

Just be sure that you're willing to forgo a graphics card
You still have a graphics card. It's no gamer card, but it works well for most things (aside from Aperture/Motion).
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Apr 2000
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 17, 2008, 08:25 PM
 
I'd stick with the 15". If you say the size has never bothered you, I think this is just lust for something new and cool, and you may well end up regretting it.

Entirely your call though, but in my opinion, the 15" is a far better machine.
     
Forum Regular
Join Date: Sep 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 17, 2008, 08:55 PM
 
Yeah, I can't for the life of me see any reason to buy a Macbook Air, other than looking sexy. It's not even that small, being wider than a regular Macbook.

Plus, on all those trips, will you NEVER want to pop in a CD? Burn a CD for someone? Watch a DVD movie? Use a firewire port? Swap a battery?

It's just so bizarre that Apple released a product that in many ways is vastly inferior to my 5 year old titanium powerbook.

I guess it's like the iPod shuffle of laptops. A crippled piece of hardware aimed at people for whom the already microscopic Nano is somehow too big...
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 17, 2008, 09:20 PM
 
Originally Posted by flabasha View Post
Plus, on all those trips, will you NEVER want to pop in a CD? Burn a CD for someone? Watch a DVD movie?
Rarely; if I do I'd use another machine or the Superdrive in my bag.

Originally Posted by flabasha View Post
Use a firewire port?
Nope; zero Firewire devices.

Originally Posted by flabasha View Post
Swap a battery?
Nope.

Originally Posted by flabasha View Post
It's just so bizarre that Apple released a product that in many ways is vastly inferior to my 5 year old titanium powerbook.
Nevermind that the CPU is much faster, more RAM, faster disk (SSD), longer battery life, bigger (by pixels)/brighter screen, and oh yea, it's 45% lighter.
     
Forum Regular
Join Date: Sep 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 18, 2008, 12:46 AM
 
"Rarely; if I do I'd use another machine or the Superdrive in my bag."

Isn't having a superdrive in your bag completely defeating the point of having an ultra-thin laptop? I couldn't help but bust out laughing when I saw the picture of the new MacBook Air Add-on SuperDrive!... a super-thin laptop with a cord leading to another box, just to have the capability of... what regular laptops have.


"Nevermind that the CPU is much faster, more RAM, faster disk (SSD), longer battery life, bigger (by pixels)/brighter screen, and oh yea, it's 45% lighter."

All of which you would expect from ANY computer five years more recent. It's just hilarious that I could sit next to someone with their sexy new MacBook Air, and be able to do all sorts of things they couldn't - with my old beater Powerbook.

But backwards-moving technology IS sort of the cultural rage now. When I see people furiously trying to text on their cellphones, I can't help but think, a century after the invention of the telephone, the hottest technology on the planet is... the telegraph.

It's got me thinking... what if I designed a tiny cellphone that's capable of doing smoke signals? And it could link to the MacBook Air... by carrier pigeon! Hmmm...
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 18, 2008, 01:31 AM
 
Originally Posted by flabasha View Post
I guess it's like the iPod shuffle of laptops.
But without the price advantage over the other laptops Apple offers.

Slick shoes?!! Are you crazy?!!
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 18, 2008, 01:36 AM
 
Originally Posted by mduell View Post
Nevermind that the CPU is much faster, more RAM, faster disk (SSD), longer battery life, bigger (by pixels)/brighter screen, and oh yea, it's 45% lighter.
You forgot USB 2.0 (although only one port), built-in isight, bluetooth, IEEE 802.11n and backlit keyboard.

Slick shoes?!! Are you crazy?!!
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Westside Island
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 18, 2008, 07:00 AM
 
It would make a great second machine. For me, my MBP is my only computer, so I wouldn't consider the Air.

I still think Apple made too many sacrifices to make the unit as thin as it is. Why make it a little bigger and add more horsepower and storage?
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2007
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 18, 2008, 07:35 AM
 
Originally Posted by JoshuaZ View Post
If you need the portability, why not.

Just be sure that you're willing to forgo a graphics card, Optical drive, and firewire before you buy. If you're cool with that, go for it.
Actually all laptops have a graphics card Otherwise having the display would be useless
As for the optical drive, apple provided a number of ways around this. One of which is the optional external optical drive. The other is the wireless option, allowing you to "borrow" another mac's optical drive.
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2007
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 18, 2008, 07:39 AM
 
Back to the OP's question.
If you can live with the 13"screen's form factor, then I say go for it. The small size really does help the road warriors so I can see this computer being a great asset to those who want a small light computer to travel with.

I had a MacBook and found the screen too limiting. I was able to run Aperture on it, so the integrated graphic card issue is a little over blown. Is it slower then a GPU that uses dedicated vram. Yes of course, but the performance hit is only noticable on games or aperture (it ran but it was sloooow).

my $.02 - go for it.
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: in front of my Mac
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 18, 2008, 08:51 AM
 
Technically speaking no Mac portable has a graphics card. They all have their graphics circuitry soldered straight to the MLB. There is no card.

The actual difference is between
• a highly 3d accelerated GPU with dedicated video memory and dedicated video memory bus
• an Intel integrated graphics solution snatching away RAM as VRAM and feeding it through the regular memory bus
     
Eug
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Caught in a web of deceit.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 18, 2008, 09:02 AM
 
If the weight doesn't bother you, and you don't need the MBP's power, then sell the MacBook Pro and get a MacBook.

It doesn't seem the MacBook Air really offers that much to you, and its battery life is worse than the MacBook's.
     
jogi  (op)
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 18, 2008, 09:16 AM
 
thanks everyone for the answers..!

The reason I don't like the MacBook is because it is plastic... Compare the state of a MacBook and my MacBook pro after 2 years of use and the pro is like new while the MacBook not so any more.

Aluminium is far more durable than plastic...

With regards to features and power my MacBook pro is far better than the air.
I don't use the DVD much but I will definatelly opt for one as the air will be my primary non work laptop. I rip any movies I want to my wd passport harddrive.

Screen size is ok for the air.. I will miss the higher resolution of the pro...

So is the reduced weight worth the compromise? I only wish they made a metal MacBook....
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2007
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 18, 2008, 10:57 AM
 
Originally Posted by jogi View Post
Aluminium is far more durable than plastic...
While its solely your decision and you don't need to justify it to us. Saying that the ALU case is more durable then the plastic is a reach at best.

There's a ton of threads here, and other forums about people dropping the Powerbooks and MacBook Pros (typically a very small distance) and it got dented.

On of the MacBook's claim to fame, as i were, is its durable plastic case. The aluminum is more malleable then the plastic so its more apt to bend or deform when dropped.

Like I said its your decision, but the MBP (and MBA) ALU case is not as durable/strong as the MB's Plastic case
     
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Jose
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 18, 2008, 11:52 AM
 
---
(Last edited by mfbernstein; Jan 25, 2008 at 12:30 PM. )
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Near Antietam Creek
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 18, 2008, 12:14 PM
 
Originally Posted by flabasha View Post
<snip>...It's just hilarious that I could sit next to someone with their sexy new MacBook Air, and be able to do all sorts of things they couldn't - with my old beater Powerbook.<snip>
Another thing the MBA owner couldn't do: give a sh!t.
I am stupidest when I try to be funny.
     
jogi  (op)
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 18, 2008, 12:43 PM
 
Originally Posted by MacosNerd View Post
While its solely your decision and you don't need to justify it to us. Saying that the ALU case is more durable then the plastic is a reach at best.

There's a ton of threads here, and other forums about people dropping the Powerbooks and MacBook Pros (typically a very small distance) and it got dented.

On of the MacBook's claim to fame, as i were, is its durable plastic case. The aluminum is more malleable then the plastic so its more apt to bend or deform when dropped.

Like I said its your decision, but the MBP (and MBA) ALU case is not as durable/strong as the MB's Plastic case
what about discoloration though? Like the White becoming yellowish and the matt black becoming shiny in the palm rests and touchpad ? Same for the keyboard. These are my concerns, cause if I drop it I broke it 99%... The aluminum looks the same no matter how Manu years you have it
     
Eug
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Caught in a web of deceit.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 18, 2008, 12:51 PM
 
Discolouration was generally a problem with the first MacBook cases, but those were replaced under warranty. The new case doesn't suffer the same problem - it's a different formulation. I suppose since it's white it can still potentially get discoloured, but mine shows no discolouration after about a year. (My first case got discoloured after several months, so they replaced with a case with the new plastic formulation.)

There are no obvious scratches on mine either, but I tend to take care of my laptop better than some do.
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Manhattan, NY
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 18, 2008, 01:05 PM
 
Originally Posted by scottiB View Post
Another thing the MBA owner couldn't do: give a sh!t.
or make rent.
     
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: In a constant state of panic...
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 18, 2008, 01:18 PM
 
Technically speaking no Mac portable has a graphics card. They all have their graphics circuitry soldered straight to the MLB. There is no card.

The actual difference is between
• a highly 3d accelerated GPU with dedicated video memory and dedicated video memory bus
• an Intel integrated graphics solution snatching away RAM as VRAM and feeding it through the regular memory bus
...you beat me to it.

the geek source
Twitter: @thegeeksource
     
Forum Regular
Join Date: Sep 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 18, 2008, 04:16 PM
 
Originally Posted by scottiB View Post
Another thing the MBA owner couldn't do: give a sh!t.
True. But he sure could buy one, couldn't he?
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: ~/
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 18, 2008, 08:44 PM
 
Originally Posted by Zeeb View Post
or make rent.
For people contemplating an MBA, I don't think trying to pay the rent is an issue.
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:41 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2