Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Hardware - Troubleshooting and Discussion > Mac Notebooks > 5400 rpm vs 7200 rpm

5400 rpm vs 7200 rpm
Thread Tools
krx
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Chicago
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 5, 2009, 12:04 PM
 
I see that I can upgrade on a 2.66 MHz 15" MBP to a 7200 rpm HDD for $45. Wondering how much difference I'm likely to see? Seems like a cheap upgrade if it makes a difference in speed.
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 5, 2009, 12:41 PM
 
I would go for it.

If you work with larger files, you'll notice the difference. Even booting up or doing backups should improve.

-t
     
krx  (op)
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Chicago
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 5, 2009, 12:46 PM
 
Thanks. Just found this link which also answers the question.

Seems cheap for a real performance upgrade.
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: in front of my Mac
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 5, 2009, 01:12 PM
 
It's a cheap upgrade that offers a bit of a boost. Obviously an SSD will be a much bigger improvement, but it's also a good deal more expensive.

Also, contrary to what you sometimes read on the internet, a 7200 rpm disk is not always louder/hotter or more power-hungry than a 5400 rpm disk. It depends on the exact models you're comparing.
     
krx  (op)
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Chicago
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 5, 2009, 01:31 PM
 
I know the SSD is quiter and more reliable but, assuming equal capacity, is there also a performance improvement?

I'm looking at the pros/cons of the Apple upgrade for a new MBP as per the louder/hotter/hungrier issue...
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 5, 2009, 01:41 PM
 
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: in front of my Mac
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 5, 2009, 03:37 PM
 
The SSD will cut app launch time in half, at least. IOW your system will feel snappier.

Boot time is also about half.
     
mdc
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY²
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 5, 2009, 03:55 PM
 
I just ordered a 15" MacBook Pro today and went with the 7200rpm drive. Everyone I've spoken to says that it's great value for money.
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: in front of my Mac
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 6, 2009, 02:11 AM
 
Indeed, it is.
     
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Apr 2008
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 6, 2009, 03:43 AM
 
I use Pro Tools & here's the truth.


I always recorded to my system drive which was a 120gb 5400 rpm I upgraded to a 7200 rpm 320 Gb & honestly I can barely tell the difference....

All I know is that I can hear and feel the 7200 rpm vibrating where the 5400 rpm was smooth & quiet. If anything I would upgrade to a larger 500Gb 5400 rpm drive as in real world test the 7200 rpm has not provided any benefits in all applications I run.

This is from Logic Pro to Pro Tools. Now maybe if you were working with video than maybe you would see the difference but for Professional audio even though 7200 rpm drives are recommended in my real world test it does nothing.
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Truckee, CA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 6, 2009, 12:35 PM
 
Originally Posted by mdc View Post
I just ordered a 15" MacBook Pro today and went with the 7200rpm drive. Everyone I've spoken to says that it's great value for money.
Yes but with EC/34, many more pixels and screen real estate the 17" is even better. Also matte display if that matters like it does to me. For real laptop performance get a 7200 rpm drive and an SSD in the EC/34 slot...

Lack of EC/34 slot is a huge value loss in the 15" size.

-Allen Wicks
     
mdc
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY²
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 6, 2009, 05:26 PM
 
I used to have a 17" PowerBook after owning a 15" PowerBook and while I love the screen I just found it too big to carry around everyday.

I currently have a 13" MacBook and feel that the 15" is a happy medium between screen size and portability. I carry my MacBook to work everyday so the 17" would just be too much.
     
krx  (op)
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Chicago
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 6, 2009, 05:57 PM
 
Originally Posted by SierraDragon View Post
For real laptop performance get a 7200 rpm drive and an SSD in the EC/34 slot...
Could you explain this just a bit - for what purpose would you run an SSD thru the EC/34 slot on top of an internal 7200 HDD?

Originally Posted by SierraDragon View Post
Lack of EC/34 slot is a huge value loss in the 15" size.
Since I have yet to pull the trigger on mine, what makes the EC/34 so valuable? As mdc points out the 17" seems like a lot to lug around (I'm actually thinking of getting the 13" MBP and buying a coupla LCD displays for my work stations) ... but maybe it's worth it ??
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:04 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2