Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Community > Team MacNN > [ogr]

[ogr]
Thread Tools
Senior User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Portland, OR
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 12, 2003, 09:26 PM
 
I have a 233 Mhz Rev A iMac that will do ~2M stubs per second on OGR-25

I have a B&W 450 arriving Monday. Can I assume that it will do at least 2X that amount per second, given Mhz speed increase, as well as the 100Mhz bus?

Also, if I put the 800Mhz Zif upgrade in..will it then double output over the 450? Or close to it?

Thanks Mac gurus

TIA
(Last edited by Chinasaur; Apr 12, 2003 at 09:54 PM. )
iMac - C2D, 2.8Ghz, 4GB, 320GB
MacBook - C2D, 2.4Ghz Uni, 4GB, 500GB
     
Administrator
Join Date: May 2000
Location: California
Status: Online
Reply With Quote
Apr 13, 2003, 03:50 AM
 
I'm not an OGR expert, but dnetc clients seem to mostly ignore memory bus in favor of MHz. Altivec can multiply the production on a G4, but I'm not sure if OGR is optimized. RC5-72 is Altivec optimized but last I'd heard, OGR was not.

Guesstimates:
233 - 2.0M
450 - 3.8M
800 - 6.8M (if it's a G3 75x)
800 - 7+M (if it's a G4 745x with on-die L2)

RC5 seems to get a 4x increase from altivec. If OGR is suitable for simd acceleration, I'd expect a G4 800 to get over 20M using your scale.
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Mile High City
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 13, 2003, 02:31 PM
 
OGR does not take advantage of simd accellerations on any platform to the same extent as RC5-72 though the latest cores seem to indicate there might be some slight optimization.

However, that being said, it is still a good project for older macs, or macs running OS-9. A quick benchmark on my PowerMac 800 w/256k L2 cache, showed 8,295,000+ for a single processor. This was under OS-X, using the latest OS-X client which is newer then the OS-9 clients.

Curious, I did something I haven't done in nearly a year. I booted into OS-9 and ran that client version and got a very nice 8,800,000+ on OGR. This seems to be on par with an Athlon Thunderbird 1100, an Intel Celeron 1300, A Pentium 4 2400 (yes you read that right, the P4's design really hurts it on this project) or a PIII 1100.

I am presuming you will be running OS-9. Should you ever upgrade to OS-X, do consider RC5-72 instead (much more bang for your buck on the G4 CPU machine), or one of the other great projects that runs on OS-X.

Good luck and have fun on OGR.
     
Senior User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Portland, OR
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 15, 2003, 09:58 PM
 
The new B&W 450 gets 4M stubs per second. A friends G4 400 gets 5.6M per second.

I can't wait to see what the G3 800Mhz zif upgrade gets.
iMac - C2D, 2.8Ghz, 4GB, 320GB
MacBook - C2D, 2.4Ghz Uni, 4GB, 500GB
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:14 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2