Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Community > Team MacNN > G5 with folding

G5 with folding
Thread Tools
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 27, 2003, 03:39 PM
 
ok so it arrived at about 4:00 GMT today and the first thing i did after instalation was to start F@H 3 mins later a big mutha of a protein (400 steps p692_L939_K12M_int) was running 8 mins after that step 1 done 8mins after that step 2 you see where i am going on this

my 800iBook does one step in 30mins so this is a major increase in output for me and i have been waiting for it for a long time
so 53hours later i should be 90points richer

cant wait for a G5 programmed folding client + panther
     
Senior User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Portland, OR
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 28, 2003, 09:55 PM
 
Only Bill Gates would say that people don't really need 64 bit computing. The same "person" who said "512K should be enough for anyone.."

nUff said.

Congrats on your puchase
iMac - C2D, 2.8Ghz, 4GB, 320GB
MacBook - C2D, 2.4Ghz Uni, 4GB, 500GB
     
Forum Regular
Join Date: Aug 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 29, 2003, 03:55 AM
 
Originally posted by Chinasaur:
Only Bill Gates would say that people don't really need 64 bit computing. The same "person" who said "512K should be enough for anyone.."
Except he didn't actually say that.
     
Senior User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Portland, OR
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 29, 2003, 08:15 PM
 
I referenced two statements..one of which I just read on Cnet..the other is Internet myth..

Which one are you taking issue with?

And that's not really the point is it?...the point is that we DO need 64 bit computing

Night.
iMac - C2D, 2.8Ghz, 4GB, 320GB
MacBook - C2D, 2.4Ghz Uni, 4GB, 500GB
     
Administrator
Join Date: May 2000
Location: California
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 29, 2003, 10:19 PM
 
I believe BG said that 640 KB would be enough for anyone. This goes back to the original IBM PC that addressed 1 MB: 640 KB for user space, and 384 KB reserved for the system. I'm not sure why they did a hard split like that.

Intel of late has been trying to tell everyone that you don't need 64-bit for the desktop. Naturally, this has nothing to do with Intel not having a 64-bit desktop CPU for sale, while IBM and AMD do. I hadn't heard that BG had joined that chorus.

One might note that True64 Linux has been out for years, while XP64 won't be out for a while yet. That couldn't have anything to do with Bill's opinion. Nope.
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:26 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2