Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Community > Team MacNN > enhanced BOINC clients for linux?

enhanced BOINC clients for linux?
Thread Tools
Forum Regular
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Raleigh, NC, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 7, 2006, 11:32 PM
 
Anyone know of any good SSE (not SSE2-SSE3) enhanced BOINC/Rosetta clients for linux? Most of the ones I've come across only work for SSE2 or SSE3.

Thanks,
Justin
     
Senior User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dublin, CA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 8, 2006, 07:45 PM
 
Originally Posted by JustinHoMi
Anyone know of any good SSE (not SSE2-SSE3) enhanced BOINC/Rosetta clients for linux? Most of the ones I've come across only work for SSE2 or SSE3.

Thanks,
Justin

Gooooood question!

Stab in the dark....will the mac version run on linux? Afterall, the mac version is unix, right? Not talking about the GUI, but the CLI exec.
     
Forum Regular
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Raleigh, NC, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 8, 2006, 08:27 PM
 
Very unlikely. Mac OS X is based on a unix derivative, but I've never heard of any programs that would run on both platforms without being recompiled. You've got different libraries, among other things.
     
Senior User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dublin, CA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 8, 2006, 09:52 PM
 
Originally Posted by JustinHoMi
Very unlikely. Mac OS X is based on a unix derivative, but I've never heard of any programs that would run on both platforms without being recompiled. You've got different libraries, among other things.

My german isn't very good....

http://gathering.tweakers.net/forum/...82224#25882224


Also, try this one. It looks like it starts out all about windows, but has links to linux too:

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=101223
     
Forum Regular
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Raleigh, NC, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 8, 2006, 10:38 PM
 
I did install the 5.5.0 SSE version from the first link, but I kept getting errors when reporting results. I was never actually able to report a single WU.

I don't see any linux stuff on the second page.... I actually went through the page earlier today and couldn't find anything then either. I guess I'm just blind.
     
Senior User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dublin, CA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 8, 2006, 11:00 PM
 
Originally Posted by JustinHoMi
I did install the 5.5.0 SSE version from the first link, but I kept getting errors when reporting results. I was never actually able to report a single WU.

I don't see any linux stuff on the second page.... I actually went through the page earlier today and couldn't find anything then either. I guess I'm just blind.
I'm trying it right now (with ubuntu). I'll let you know.

Did you make sure you had all the libs (the README provides a command to see)? I found I was missing 2.

The first link also has links for 5.2.14.

Erik
     
Senior User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dublin, CA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 8, 2006, 11:29 PM
 
Originally Posted by JustinHoMi
Anyone know of any good SSE (not SSE2-SSE3) enhanced BOINC/Rosetta clients for linux? Most of the ones I've come across only work for SSE2 or SSE3.

Thanks,
Justin
While I have the attention of someone who knows...

What's the difference between SSE, SSE2, and SSE3? I understand it has something about the CPU, and maybe Intel specific. But that's it.

TIA
     
Senior User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dublin, CA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 9, 2006, 03:05 AM
 
Understand that Rosetta is a bit different. Job completion is based on time, not work. The default is ~3 hours.

After updating, one of the two jobs running immediately reported in with an error. The next one finished about 14 minutes later, sucessfully. Same for the 3rd job.

To recap: 1st in process job failed. Next two worked. I'll let you know if there are more failures. Otherwise, assume continuing success.

It's a Pentium D 940 (2x3.2ghz w/ 2x2MB cache), running the latest ubuntu, with all updates. I also had to add a couple of libraries according to the README.

Oh yeah, this was was with the SSE version. Would the SSE2 be better? Worse? Not work at all?

And what's up with the 5.5.0? The latest BOINC version is 5.4.9. So what does 5.5.0 refer to?
     
Forum Regular
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Raleigh, NC, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 9, 2006, 11:08 AM
 
If your processor supports SSE2, then yes, it would be faster. Type "cat /proc/cpuinfo" and look for "SSE" and "SSE2" at the bottom. My guess is that the Pentium D would definitely support SSE3.

I don't know what the deal is with 5.5.0.... Maybe it's just based on the current code from CVS.
     
Senior User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dublin, CA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 24, 2006, 10:24 PM
 
Update: SSE2 is much faster than with SSE.

JustinHoMi: What kind of CPU and/or version of linux were you using when you got all those errors?

Up until recently, I had been working exclusively with intel and Ubuntu.

I recently aquired an AMD Athlon X2. For no apparent reason, I decided to try out SUSE for a change. I installed the 5.5.0 w/ SSE2. Almost all the results were errors. I tried down grading to the SSE version. Same thing. Then downgrading to the stock client. Same thing.

So I installed ubuntu instead, and SSE2 verison of 5.5.0, and it worked like a charm. No errors.

So maybe the problem was SUSE. I don't really have enough samples to know for sure. I do know this: Ubuntu with both intel and amd works with 5.5.0 for me. Perhaps you should try Ubuntu?

Here is the odd bit: I thought AMD would be significantly faster than Intel (even at a slower clock speed). But this is what I have found:

Pentium D 940 (3.2ghz): mid 10k sec = ~105 credits
AMD Athlon X2 4200+ (2.2ghz): mid 10k sec = ~90 credits
Pentium D 820 (2.8ghz): mid 10k sec = ~85 credits

So yeah, it is faster than the D 820, but I thought it would also be faster than the D 940 too.
     
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: London
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 25, 2006, 02:35 AM
 
SIMAP have recently issued a new Linux version. How does that work as a comparison?

K.
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:19 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2