 |
 |
Why are PCs relatively good at Ubero?
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jul 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
I've got 3 agents runchig Ubero for me right now: an iMac 500, a Pismo 400, and a Compaq 350.
The iMac goes through about 100 units a day. I use the memory tweak.
The Pismo does about 80 units a day. I run it from the command line, no memory tweak (not enough memory).
The Compaq does about 100 units a day, from the GUI. I dunno how to use the Windows CLI, so I can't run Ubero any faster on this thing.
Why is the PC doing so well? I thought that Pentium IIIs were slower per megahertz than G3s.
|
|
Actual conversation between UCLA and Stanford during a login on early Internet - U: I'm going to type an L! Did you get an L? S: I got one-one-four. L! U:Did you get the O? S: One-one-seven. U: <types G> S: The computer just crashed.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Florida
Status:
Offline
|
|
I would imagine that Sun and Microsoft spend more time and money on developing a good and fast Java environment for Windows, since almost everyone uses windows.
PS go here to get info on using the CLI for windows.
here
|
|
-- SBS --
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jul 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
Thanx Ski, but I don't even know what the autoexec.bat is, let alone want to fiddle with it. I don't know how to access the CLI in Windows like the Mac Terminal.
|
|
Actual conversation between UCLA and Stanford during a login on early Internet - U: I'm going to type an L! Did you get an L? S: I got one-one-four. L! U:Did you get the O? S: One-one-seven. U: <types G> S: The computer just crashed.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Moderator Emeritus 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: College Park, MD
Status:
Offline
|
|
I'll have instructions soon.
I've got the IBM JRE on my server, and as soon as I get it somewhere with a faster pipe, I'll link to it.
I've just been really busy.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: In my tree making cookies
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by cdhostage:
<STRONG>I've got 3 agents runchig Ubero for me right now: an iMac 500, a Pismo 400, and a Compaq 350.
The iMac goes through about 100 units a day. I use the memory tweak.
The Pismo does about 80 units a day. I run it from the command line, no memory tweak (not enough memory).
The Compaq does about 100 units a day, from the GUI. I dunno how to use the Windows CLI, so I can't run Ubero any faster on this thing.
Why is the PC doing so well? I thought that Pentium IIIs were slower per megahertz than G3s.</STRONG>
For me, it's just the opposite; I've got a Powermac G4 DP450 and a P3 1Ghz running Ubero, both command line, but with the IBM JRE on the P3, and my PowerMac is still kicking my P3's beige butt.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Chico, CA and Carlsbad, CA.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by cdhostage:
<STRONG>[snip]
The iMac goes through about 100 units a day. I use the memory tweak.
The Pismo does about 80 units a day. I run it from the command line, no memory tweak (not enough memory).
[/snip]</STRONG>
I have a Pismo 400 with 384 RAM, running OSX... it runs Ubero (well, I crunch dnetc now).. but I used to run Ubero, my best day was 95 units... running the CLI with tweaks.
|
"In Nomine Patris, Et Fili, Et Spiritus Sancti"
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Senior User
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Status:
Offline
|
|
Well, last night I finished the first full 24 hour run at Ubero on my Dual 800. I'm running 2 instances of the CLI through the Terminal. I've editted the memory tweak a little bit to where I think it gives me better performance. I use:
<font face = "courier">java -Xms900m -Xmx900m -XX:NewSize=300m -XX:MaxNewSize=300m -cp Agent.jar ubero.agent.Agent -text </font>
If that's wrong, someone let me know. Anyway, I completed 208 tasks per processor. So that's 416 total tasks yesterday. Not too bad for a single machine. Just thought I would share.
Edit: Formatting...
[ 01-29-2002: Message edited by: malson ]
|
|
Yeah, about those TPS reports, didn't you get the memo?
--------------
2.3 Ghz Dual-Core G5/20" LCD/Life is Good!
Moo...
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Florida
Status:
Offline
|
|
208 per 800 Mhz G4, that's great. At best my 867 only did 202. I guess that a dual system as more power per processor since the work load for the OS is spread out over two processors.
|
|
-- SBS --
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
 |
Forum Rules
|
 |
 |
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|