Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Community > Team MacNN > Performance Help!!

Performance Help!!
Thread Tools
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2000
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 15, 2000, 10:57 AM
 
I can't get my performance per unit higher than the 9+ hours per unit. I have followed all the suggestions (higher caches speed, Ram disk, quitting processes, LibMoto), but to very little avail. I have a G4/400 (AGP) with 192MB Ram. I would think that it should do better than 9 hours...
"It's about time trees did something good insted of just standing there LIKE JERKS!" :)
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Oct 1999
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 15, 2000, 11:06 AM
 
Are you running SETI 3.0 or 2.04?

3.0 has been proven to be slower... see other threads in this forum relating to that.
     
Brazuca  (op)
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2000
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 16, 2000, 10:08 AM
 
I'm running 3.0 and the latest of everything else. I've been reading of people doing a WU in 4-5 hrs!!!
I also didn't notice a difference wether I kill every process or if I run it as a standard screen saver.
"It's about time trees did something good insted of just standing there LIKE JERKS!" :)
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Minneapolis, MN USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 16, 2000, 10:12 AM
 
Those 5 and 6 hour blocks were generated on the 2.04 client. I'm running
a AGP G4 / 400 with 128 megs of ram and that's about what I'm getting too.

I went back to 2.04 and will stay there until forced to migrate. What
really bums me is the medium range Pentium machines I have at work can
churn out blocks in 3-6 hours now under 3.x. Irritating.

I believe they modified the code so it was more friendly to cheaper and
more inexpensive computers (smaller L2 cache and slower FSB) and made it
a bit more difficult for machines with the large L2 cache the G4 systems
have. They'll never create an Altivec client so get used to it (unless 9.1 OS has more Altivec optimization for the math routines that is).

     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:26 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2