Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Community > Team MacNN > seti@home 3.0.3

seti@home 3.0.3
Thread Tools
Professional Poster
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 13, 2000, 06:29 PM
 
Does anyone know what the difference is between 3.0 and 3.0.3? Maybe it will help those of us with 1 meg caches.
     
Senior User
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 13, 2000, 08:28 PM
 
Yeah. maybe.

But it's gonna produce slower results for everyone anyway.
It does more processing.

The seti folks are complaining because their servers can't keep up with the load, so they figure they'll slow everyone down to decrease the load.

damn. looks like my times are just gonna keep dropping
     
MasterZeus
Guest
Status:
Reply With Quote
Dec 14, 2000, 08:31 AM
 
According to the SETI 3.03 page, Berkeley is limiting their bandwith, not their servers can't keep up. Maybe its just an excuse by I don't see why it would be.

http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/version303.html

------------------
THE Master has spoken

[This message has been edited by MasterZeus (edited 12-14-2000).]
     
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: East Africa
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 14, 2000, 08:44 AM
 
so is v2 actually obsolete, then? has anyone using 2.04 been rejected when trying to return/dl a new wu? reading that seti link in the last past made it sound like it's coming soon, anyway, but as always the info is vague vague vague.
Help find a cure for Malaria: crunch D2OL for Team Macnn.
     
Administrator
Join Date: May 2000
Location: California
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 14, 2000, 11:22 AM
 
2.04 still going strong here. I get the "upgrade soon" message every time, but it keeps offerng new work units to process.
     
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Pasadena, CA USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 14, 2000, 11:46 AM
 
Yep, 3.x is miserable if you are only out for units! If you are trrying to really "help", then I guess it doesn't matter - but really, who's in this for such noble reasons???

Scott

PS - 2.0.4 seems to work fine, although the upgrade message will still pop up, as was stated.
     
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: East Africa
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 14, 2000, 11:56 AM
 
is the upgrade message in the form of a dialogue box? or does it just pop as text within the seti data screen? i have a computer on the network and don't want to be there to hit enter to keep it running..
Help find a cure for Malaria: crunch D2OL for Team Macnn.
     
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Pasadena, CA USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 14, 2000, 03:00 PM
 
Dialog box - and it doesn't appear right away...very tricky of them. I once saw a little freeware app that would dismiss dialog boxes after a preset amount of time...might be good to find that or make an AppleScript that does it???

Scott
     
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: East Africa
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 14, 2000, 04:00 PM
 
mm, very tricky indeed. oh well. 3.0 isn't too horrendous. or at least, it could get worse if i upgraded.
Help find a cure for Malaria: crunch D2OL for Team Macnn.
     
Administrator
Join Date: May 2000
Location: California
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 14, 2000, 04:41 PM
 
The "upgrade soon" dialog comes up when the new work unit has been downloaded. Apparently right when the crunching starts. If you have a slow modem, or if Berkeley's servers are running behind, you will not see the dialog until the new unit has come through or until the client gives up waiting.

The dialog does not have to be dismissed before SETI will start crunching again. I have often checked in the morning. Dismiss the dialog, discover that the new work unit is 80% done. Never had a full unit finish and "lap" the dialog box, I don't know what would happen then. Maybe dismiss the dialog and have the next one pop up to be dismissed.
     
Senior User
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 14, 2000, 09:07 PM
 
3.0.3 is a real dog.

using 3.0 I can usually do a unit in about 11 to 11.5 hours.

i'm doing my first 3.0.3 unit and its taken 10.5 hours to do 50%.

I might just stick with 3.0
     
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: AB, Canada
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 14, 2000, 11:25 PM
 
If you are in it to get lots of units done use the older version until you are forced to upgrade. I was doing a unit every 8-11 hours with 3.0. With 3.0.3 I am only 20% complete after 3.5 hours. Normally I would be at 30% complete by this time.

------------------
As a man comes, so he departs.
As a man comes, so he departs.
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 14, 2000, 11:26 PM
 
I agree with you on the slowness. I wonder how much more science stuff they have added to effectively double the time on my 466 G3... Oh well, I wonder how all of those 4hour/wu intel/amd chips are doing now...
     
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Marseille FRANCE
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 16, 2000, 07:06 AM
 
I confirm: SETI 3.03 is a snail. My first WU under 3.03 wiil request more than 30 hours against 15-25 hours on my iMac rev.B 233 MHz. I hope its discriminating features is better than prior version for stopping analysis of uninteresting WU. SETI said in documentation related to 3.03 that some WU could ended very quickly if no interesting data were detected and that more interesting ones were studied thoroughly thus the differences in times for treatment. On the other hand, on version 2.04, times were practically equal whatever the WU.

------------------
Fight against the Dark Force (Microsoft)
Fight against the Dark Force (Microsoft)
     
Senior User
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 16, 2000, 10:21 AM
 
Well, my first unit with 3.0.3 finished in 18:17, compared to about 11:30 for 3.0
Pretty damn slow.
I think I'll just use 3.0 from now on.
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: various
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 17, 2000, 12:04 PM
 


this is just silly. 3.03 is taking absurdly long. 8 and a half hours for 50%?!?
with 2.04 i was getting seven hour units.
with 3.0 i was getting 6-10 hour units.
now? uggg.

does anyone have 3.0 up somewhere i can get it from?
i don't have it any more, and that makes me sad.

thanks,
poocat.
"The supreme irony of life is that hardly anyone gets out of it alive."
-Robert A. Heinlein, Job
     
Daniel Hazard
Guest
Status:
Reply With Quote
Dec 17, 2000, 12:33 PM
 
The SETI page states that the 3.0.3 does its analyze within a chirp rate of +- 20 Hz/second instead of +- 10 Hz/second as the 3.0 client did. I suppose this will about double the time it will take to process a unit. For all of us who are in this for the fun of "racing" against others, it would be nice if the units returned with the 3.0.3 client would count twice.
Anyone got a good friend at SETI who could possibly bring that idea to the SETI folks?
/Daniel
     
Administrator
Join Date: May 2000
Location: California
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 17, 2000, 02:47 PM
 
poocat, you have mail. Probably spam too, but definitely mail.
     
mleroux01
Guest
Status:
Reply With Quote
Dec 17, 2000, 05:04 PM
 
You're all missing the point, folks. The goal of this experiment is science, not accumulating the most units crunched. And besides, soon version 3.03 will be mandatory for everyone and the speed difference between versions will be moot.

I'm glad to see they are doing more processing on each unit.
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: various
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 18, 2000, 05:10 AM
 


oh, definitely spam. spam, spam, and spam some more...
...but also mail.
thanks a lot!

back in the ranks of the speedy.


poocat.
"The supreme irony of life is that hardly anyone gets out of it alive."
-Robert A. Heinlein, Job
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2000
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 19, 2000, 11:52 AM
 
is there ANY chance in Hell that SETI finds anything? Of course not!
the science is only "the point" in theory, not in practice.

The Real point is that it's fun! (and wastes lots of power).
and when everybody gets bored of SETI (which may never happen), the door will be opened for more useful distributed computing projects like this.

So crunch away with the fastest thing you've got!

[NB: This post doesn't exist.]
------------------
be happy!
-mac freak

[This message has been edited by elzinat (edited 12-19-2000).]
     
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: East Africa
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 19, 2000, 04:01 PM
 
uh oh, someone's making a good point. seek shelter if you can. at least duck behind your sturdy minitower. and by all means, ignore the posts that don't exist!
Help find a cure for Malaria: crunch D2OL for Team Macnn.
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:31 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2