Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Community > Team MacNN > 16-20 hour average...what's wrong?

16-20 hour average...what's wrong?
Thread Tools
Mr_Frost
Guest
Status:
Reply With Quote
Apr 30, 2001, 05:22 PM
 
I have a 16-20 hour average now with the CLI Seti.
Everywhere I keep seeing thos 5-10 hour averages...what's up with that?
I have a G4 400 with 320 MB ram and OSX 10.0.1
Is there any way I can speed things up?

I came from 34 hour average with the screensaver so I have improved but still....
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Columbus, OH
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 7, 2001, 08:53 AM
 
I'm seeing similar results on a PowerBook G4 500mhz w/256mb ram. Throughput is averaging 30+ hours. Those aliens are going to be hard to find at this rate!
HyperNova Software, LLC
     
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Apr 2001
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 8, 2001, 10:46 AM
 
Me too. It takes 31hrs on my 450 G4 cube with 192 Mb memory.....
screensaver on

iEasyPOD - The easiest way to convert all your videos for the iPod
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: The Sar Chasm
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 8, 2001, 12:19 PM
 
My results with the 3.03 screensaver vary from 16 to 22 hrs. on a G4 450. I can't figure why the variation, but according to seti, my avg. time is 20 point something. If I'm going to let it chug away at night, I'll close everything else on the machine. Maybe having a ton of apps open, even if they're idle, saps processor cycles. Idle speculation. My 604e 150 averages about 150 hrs per.

CV

When a true genius appears in the world you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him. -- Jonathan Swift.
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Binghamton, New York, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 8, 2001, 01:24 PM
 
Its been well documented that 3.03 is much slower than older versions of the SETI software. Some people have so many units processed by the old software under their belt that they will continue to have low workunit processing times for a while. My G4/466 w/384MB ram averages about 16-20 hours per unit with SETI being the only open app.

------------------
Jesus chills with a 40
2.3Ghz 17" SandyBridge MBP 8GB RAM 7.2k 750GB HD anti-glare display|Dell 2408WFP|64GB iPad2 ATT 3G
     
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: College Park, MD
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 8, 2001, 01:37 PM
 
My PM 8500-150MHz (upgraded to 1MB L2 cache) takes about 48 hrs per unit.


------------------
G3 400, 384, 12 + 75 GB
PM 8500 - 150, 48, 1 GB
PM 7100 - 66, 32, 700 MB
PM 6100 - 66, 40, 4.5 GB
My website
Help me pay for college. Click for more info.
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Carbondale, IL
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 9, 2001, 02:41 PM
 
iMac DV + 450Mhz,128MB,
SETI only in use when im in bed

17 hours

------------------
AIM: gumby5647
ICQ:41746288
Gumby5647@yahoo.com
http://homepage.mac.com/gumby5647
iMac DV +, Indigo, 128MB, 20GB
AIM: bmichel5581
MacBook 2.2 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo
4GB RAM
160GB
     
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Jan 2001
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 19, 2001, 07:17 AM
 
Mr_Frost try creating and using a RAM Disk for Seti@home. A 1MB RAM Disk should be big enough, which shouldn't be a big problem since you have 320 MB. The RAM Disk isn't for the entire Seti@home application, it's for the .sah files that must be read and written thousands of times during a work unit. It speeds things up by not using the hard drive to read and write these files, a extra bonus is that it saves a lot of wear and tear on your hard drive. This is very important for laptop user's of Seti@home because by not constantly spinning up the hard drive, your battery last longer. Anyways, it's easy to set up a RAM Disk for Seti@home, just go to Seti Station.
     
Mr_Frost
Guest
Status:
Reply With Quote
May 19, 2001, 11:23 AM
 
ok...that sounds really good. :-)
Does this mean that the seti app will not stop running when you put your HD to sleep?
that would be awesome
     
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: College Park, MD
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 19, 2001, 12:10 PM
 
But when your comp locks up you lose the whole unit that was being crunched.

------------------
G3 400, 384, 12 + 75 GB
PM 8500 - 150, 176, 4.3 GB
PM 7100 - 66, 32, 700 MB
PM 6100 - 66, 40, 1 GB
And the lowest of all:
Athlon Thunderbird 954MHz, 128, 8GB
My website
Help me pay for college. Click for more info.
     
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Jan 2001
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 19, 2001, 06:10 PM
 
originally posted by Mr_Frost:
Does this mean that the seti app will not stop running when you put your HD to sleep?
I have a iBook and when I put the whole system to sleep while Seti is running, the app stops, but if I choose "spin down hard disk" from the energy saver control panel or if the hard drive just spins down on it's own, the app just keeps crunching away like nothing happened. So, to answer your question. Yes, Seti will keep running if you put your hard drive to sleep but will stop running if you put the whole system to sleep.

originally posted by scotttheking:
But when your comp locks up you lose the whole unit that was being crunched.
Maybe not if you regularly make a backup copy of the Seti@home Data folder that's in the RAM Disk. I'm not sure on this though, I'll have to try it out.
     
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: College Park, MD
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 19, 2001, 07:36 PM
 
You can make backups, and if the comp crashes you can use the most recent backup, but it elimiates the point of the ram disk.
Either you manually do it every X amount of time, which means you are at your machine to do it, and you have to spin up your hard drive to do it (uses a lot of power to spin it up)
or
you have a program that does it, using processing power, that has to spin up your hard drive to do it (uses a lot of power to spin it up)

So there is no point to it.

------------------
G3 400, 384, 12 + 75 GB
PM 8500 - 150, 176, 4.3 GB
PM 7100 - 66, 32, 700 MB
PM 6100 - 66, 40, 1 GB
And the lowest of all:
Athlon Thunderbird 954MHz, 128, 8GB
My website
Help me pay for college. Click for more info.
     
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Jan 2001
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 20, 2001, 09:16 AM
 
My iBook locked up this morning using IE 5. I had to turn off the computer and reboot using the power button. I then launched the Seti app and it picked up where it lefted off. I've never made a back up of the RAM Disk, whether OS 9.1 has or not I don't know. I opened the RAM Disk folder and all the all the .sah files were still there.

There is a RAM Disk program called ramBunctious that will automatically backup the RAM Disk to the hard drive at whatever time intervals you specify.

btw/ Mr_Frost,
Seti will not work while the whole system is in sleep mode, so it's important to set the sleep timer for the system to NEVER in the energy saver control panel. The system will to sleep with Seti running on a RAM Disk because now the system doesn't see itself as active.
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:32 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2