 |
 |
Using CompactFlash as a hard drive replacement
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Belgium
Status:
Offline
|
|
Has anyone tried to do this in an IDE Mac? I'd be pretty cool to construct a 100% silent Mac using this and an old PowerBook (fanless, silent power supply)
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Decatur, GA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Nope, but interesting. Especially since CF media is now around 2GB.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Moderator Emeritus 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Illinois
Status:
Offline
|
|
You could just use one of those compact-flash to firewire keychains. They are supposed to be bootable. But I'm not sure if it would be a great idea -- compact flash is pretty slow and it has a limited number of writes before it dies.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Belgium
Status:
Offline
|
|
Using FireWire would only work on FireWire equipped Macs though. And it wouldn't be a mod either 
CompactFlash should be fast enough to boot from, and they're not *that* limited in the amount of times you can write to them. Remember that the first Macs booted of floppy disks, which you can write to like 30 times and they're for the trash. Compact Flash does much better than that.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: London, UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
Might try this just for fun with a 5300c... since I have a 256MB CF card and PCMCIA adaptor.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Evinyatar:
Remember that the first Macs booted of floppy disks, which you can write to like 30 times and they're for the trash.
30 times? I was a wee lad when the first Macs came out, but didn't they use smaller capacity 3.5" floppy disks? Surely you could write to them more than 30 times. Am I way off here?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: In support of our troops
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by bradoesch:
30 times? I was a wee lad when the first Macs came out, but didn't they use smaller capacity 3.5" floppy disks? Surely you could write to them more than 30 times. Am I way off here?
Yeah, you could read from them quite a few times, but writing on them, they went pretty fast.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Senior User
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Planet Earth
Status:
Offline
|
|
Yes, I've done it with a IDE->CF adapter and it works pretty good. I only had a 256 card so I could only use OS9.
Not as fast as you might think though.
|
|
---I'm on a low Microsoft diet.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Old Country
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by RoofusPennymore:
Yes, I've done it with a IDE->CF adapter and it works pretty good. I only had a 256 card so I could only use OS9.
Not as fast as you might think though.
Where might one get such a thing?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Senior User
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Planet Earth
Status:
Offline
|
|
I like the one from ACS Controls, Look for the link on the left for IDE Adapter under Compact Flash.
|
|
---I'm on a low Microsoft diet.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Phoenix, AZ, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Yeah, there's a limit on how many times flash memory can be written to. It's finite - not exactly sure how long they last, but you'd approach the limit faster if you used a CF card as a IDE device. However, you'd be ok with a IBM microdrive - basically a CF-sized hard drive. Kinda defeats the purpose, heh.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by x user:
Yeah, you could read from them quite a few times, but writing on them, they went pretty fast.
Does this apply to floppy disks these days also?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: In support of our troops
Status:
Offline
|
|
Yeah, but zip disks are better. I wouldn't trust a floppy as far as I could throw it. The reason the CF card isn't that fast is because the IDE bus restricts it. If only there was a Fireware to CF adaptor  .
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Old Country
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by x user:
Yeah, but zip disks are better. I wouldn't trust a floppy as far as I could throw it. The reason the CF card isn't that fast is because the IDE bus restricts it. If only there was a Fireware to CF adaptor .
ZIP disk *shiver* I think they had more issues with the good old "click of death" than a floppy.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: In support of our troops
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by COmie JOe:
ZIP disk *shiver* I think they had more issues with the good old "click of death" than a floppy.
Yeah, but they had a lifetime warrenty 
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by COmie JOe:
ZIP disk *shiver* I think they had more issues with the good old "click of death" than a floppy.
I work in a computer lab and I see regular floppies crap out every day... I have NEVER seen a zip disk give up... in fact I bought a 10 pack about a year and a half ago and I'm still using the first one... never even got to the others... I habitually fill it to capacity, unload it, fill it again, unload it etc... probably done it a couple of hundred times... no problems... try doing that with a floppy.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
 |
Forum Rules
|
 |
 |
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|