 |
 |
iMac DV -higer resolution?
|
 |
|
 |
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Aug 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
Does anyone know how to disable the internal monitor on an iMac DV and drive the external one to something higher than 1024 x 768?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Techno City (Detroit)
Status:
Offline
|
|
The *$#@ing stupid soldered-on graphics card doesn't allow it.
|
<A HREF="http://www.macnet2.com/cgi-bin/Ultimate.cgi" TARGET=_blank> 
MacNet v2 Forums</A>
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Apr 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
The graphics card can hardly be held responsible for its permanent position on the board - call the designers *$#@ing stupid, not the card.
Cipher13
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Techno City (Detroit)
Status:
Offline
|
|
You don't think a crappy card with only 8 megs of VRAM should be called *$#@ing stupid too?
|
<A HREF="http://www.macnet2.com/cgi-bin/Ultimate.cgi" TARGET=_blank> 
MacNet v2 Forums</A>
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Moderator 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Status:
Offline
|
|
Perhaps, but the VRAM is not the reason the res is locked. I think Apple has crippled the chip, but try a software called "SwitchRes" to see if there are other settings available.
http://www.madrau.com/
|
|
The low-end Mac Pro is the most overpriced Mac since the IIvx
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Dammit
|
|
The video card isn't the problem, IIRC, it's the monitor. The monitor only supports 1024x768.
Now, if you were to remove the monitor, and replace it witha another 15" capable of supporting 1280x1024, and found the correct driver, well that would be a different story.
Since the external monitor is mirror only, I think ou are SOL without altering the monitor inside in some way.
But this is all guesswork, and I will defer to my more learned colleagues.
Dammit
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Pasadena
Status:
Offline
|
|
going higher than 1024*768 on a 15" monitor that's 14.1 viewable?  I use 1280*1024 on my 19" and think that's a bit too small to read comfortably.
|
|
G4/450, T-bird 1.05GHz, iBook 500, iBook 233...4 different machines, 4 different OSes...(9, 2k, X.1, YDL2.2 respectively) PiA to maintain...
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Senior User
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Istanbul
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Evangellydonut:
going higher than 1024*768 on a 15" monitor that's 14.1 viewable?
Hehe... try 13.8.
14.1 is the viewable size of the Powerbooks, which is actually BIGGER than the viewable on their desktop iMac cousins.
Speed
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
 |
Forum Rules
|
 |
 |
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|