 |
 |
iMac and WC3
|
 |
|
 |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Nov 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
i'm just wondering, for those who play WC3 on their (new) iMacs:
what video settings, resolution, texture quality, etc. do you guys play with?
i play with everything on low 640x480x16 and medium on text. quality yet it still goes slow in battles.
i only have 128 mb of RAM..could RAM be the problem with this or can the GF2 not handle it?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Yes RAM is a issue. I assume your using OS X and that will eat up that 128 leaving very little for WC3 so you will have lots of pagin.
I have not tried this yet but people are saying it runs much better in OS 9 so you might want to give that a try.
|
|
The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions, that I wish it always to be kept alive.
- Thomas Jefferson, 1787
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Nov 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by juanvaldes:
Yes RAM is a issue. I assume your using OS X and that will eat up that 128 leaving very little for WC3 so you will have lots of pagin.
I have not tried this yet but people are saying it runs much better in OS 9 so you might want to give that a try.
i go to info on wc3 and run it in classic and it opens but when i press anything it just quits on me..
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Status:
Offline
|
|
It does run better in OS 9. I use the same iMac at home, and if you don't find it easy to play in X it helps to get more RAM.
|
|
World of Warcraft (Whisperwind - Alliance) <The Eternal Spiral>
Go Dogcows!
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by i am yujin:
i go to info on wc3 and run it in classic and it opens but when i press anything it just quits on me..
no no no no, not classic. IN OS 9.
Classic has overhead to it so it will run better in native 9.
|
|
The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions, that I wish it always to be kept alive.
- Thomas Jefferson, 1787
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Australia
Status:
Offline
|
|
Yep, performance was much worse in OS X - apparently it's getting better though, I haven't tried it with the latest patch yet.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Chicago
Status:
Offline
|
|
It is unplayable in X. If you boot into OS 9, it will be much, much better.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to Themes
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Sweden
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by xyber233:
It is unplayable in X. If you boot into OS 9, it will be much, much better.
Yes, this is a sad fact. It's probably due to bad NVIDIA drivers.. I'm hoping with every update of OS X/War3 that it will be playable in OS X..
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Chicago
Status:
Offline
|
|
How do ATi cards play wc3 in X? I'm curious to know what the wc3 performance is like on an iBook.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
Under Mac OS X 10.2.2 on an iMac G4/700 512 MB RAM GeForce 2MX I use 1024x768x32 and high quality textures, low quality everything else. I have not noticed much a speed difference in battles between this and the 640x480x16 medium setting you describe. Upgrading to WC 3 1.0.4 will help if you have no done so, but the game is still unplayable in major battles of even 2v2 games.
Back to SCBW for me...
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by xyber233:
How do ATi cards play wc3 in X? I'm curious to know what the wc3 performance is like on an iBook.
Sucks. Sorry.
Villa
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
Actually, it runs great on my iBook - 800 MHz, 32 MB Radeon 7500, 640 MB RAM. Better than on my tower, which has a Radeon 8500 but only 420 MB of RAM and a 400 MHz G4. On the tower it's playable in single player but not really multi; on the iBook it rocks.
|
|
[vash:~] banana% killall killall
Terminated
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Chicago
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Gul Banana:
Actually, it runs great on my iBook - 800 MHz, 32 MB Radeon 7500, 640 MB RAM. Better than on my tower, which has a Radeon 8500 but only 420 MB of RAM and a 400 MHz G4. On the tower it's playable in single player but not really multi; on the iBook it rocks.
What settings are you using on the iBook? This is in X right?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Nov 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
I also play Warcraft III on a tibook 667 w/half gig of memory. I put about 20 hours a week multiplayer time in and it does slow down briefly in huge battles, but is definitely playable.
I have all the latest Warcraft III patches installed and the newest Ati Drivers. My video settings are as follows. I am going straight down the line if you were to hit the video button in options
640x480x16
High
Medium
High
Medium
Medium
Off
Off
Some of these I probably do not need to turn down, but did it once and all worked well and just decided to leave it. I play side by side to a guy on a pc and it runs pretty much on par. Maybe I am just lucky.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by xyber233:
What settings are you using on the iBook? This is in X right?
It's in X, yes.. settings:
1024x768x32
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Off
Off
In single player, I can max everything out (since the iBook can only do 1024*768 anyway, it doesn't make all that much of a difference). Strangely enough, Civ III runs worse 
|
|
[vash:~] banana% killall killall
Terminated
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Chicago
Status:
Offline
|
|
Wow. Thats great to hear. Is there a noticable difference in quality between 800*600 and 1024*768 on a 12.1 in screen?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Gul Banana:
Strangely enough, Civ III runs worse
have you turned Quortz AA off? Civ 3 runs pretty good on a 400G3 until end game with it off.
|
|
The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions, that I wish it always to be kept alive.
- Thomas Jefferson, 1787
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Senior User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by xyber233:
How do ATi cards play wc3 in X?
On my 733 G4 I've had the "stock" nVidia 2MX and swapped it with the Radeon 8500 (w/ TV OUT  ) Sadly, they both do fine in OS X until a battle. Then it slows to 2-4 frames while your opponent micros and destroys you. OS 9 is good.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
 |
Forum Rules
|
 |
 |
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|