 |
 |
No plans to make Starcraft2
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Chicago
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
Screw 'World of WarCraft'! The last thing we need is a millionth Dungeons & Dragons knock-off online game! Jesus christ, these things are getting horribly boring.
Make a 'World of StarCraft' instead!
|
|
"Last time the French asked for more evidence, it rolled through France with a German flag." - David Letterman
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Evansville, IN
Status:
Offline
|
|
I am sure the game will come in due time. Most games these days are recycled ideas from old games (RTCW, Quake4, Warcraft3, etc), so I have no doubt that we will be kicking some tail in Starcraft2
[ 02-08-2002: Message edited by: Justin W. Williams ]
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Seattle, WA, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
You hear that tinkling sound off in the distance? That's my heart breaking. :'(
Eff WoW.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Apr 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
Damn hey... 
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Norway
Status:
Offline
|
|
The people that are creating WC3 now is those who shall develop Starcraft 2 if they choose to develop it. They have to finish WC3 first.
|
|
pa[r-0X]ysm fragged your face!
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Status:
Offline
|
|
But why do they choose to make WarCraft III if all people want is a StarCraft sequel?
|
|
World of Warcraft (Whisperwind - Alliance) <The Eternal Spiral>
Go Dogcows!
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Norway
Status:
Offline
|
|
Because WC3 is delayed enough already. 3-4 years late now!
|
|
pa[r-0X]ysm fragged your face!
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by r-0X#Zapchud:
<STRONG>Because WC3 is delayed enough already. 3-4 years late now!</STRONG>
I would rather have a fun game then a rushed once...That is why the few places where they can spend has long as it takes to make a game (Blizzard, ID) product A+ quality games. If only all companies could spend as long as it took to create their masterpiece...
|
|
The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions, that I wish it always to be kept alive.
- Thomas Jefferson, 1787
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Norway
Status:
Offline
|
|
Of course, but I was replying to that guy asking of why they made WC3 when what ppl wants is SC2!
|
|
pa[r-0X]ysm fragged your face!
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Highland Park, IL / Santa Monica, CA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Because when they STARTED working on WC3, StarCraft was brand new!
|
|
Be happy.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Status:
Offline
|
|
I had NO idea. I just hope Blizzard makes it eventually. They make amazing games, so the more time spent on them, the better.
|
|
World of Warcraft (Whisperwind - Alliance) <The Eternal Spiral>
Go Dogcows!
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Seattle, WA, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
No, I'm wondering why they decided to go ahead w/ WoW instead of SC2. Oh wait, probably because they wanted to jump on the MMORPG bandwagon. I bet they would make more money w/ SC2 though. I know 0 people who are interested in WoW and about 10 who would kill for SC2.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Archangel:
<STRONG>No, I'm wondering why they decided to go ahead w/ WoW instead of SC2. Oh wait, probably because they wanted to jump on the MMORPG bandwagon. I bet they would make more money w/ SC2 though. I know 0 people who are interested in WoW and about 10 who would kill for SC2.</STRONG>
You know 10 people who want a game that does not exist based soley on the name? What if they do make SC2 and **** it up as much as they have done with warcraft? Will those 10 people still want it because it is called "Star craft 2"?
|
|
The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions, that I wish it always to be kept alive.
- Thomas Jefferson, 1787
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Seattle, WA, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by juanvaldes:
<STRONG>
You know 10 people who want a game that does not exist based soley on the name? What if they do make SC2 and **** it up as much as they have done with warcraft? Will those 10 people still want it because it is called "Star craft 2"?</STRONG>
Uh, no. My friends aren't stupid. It would be under the assumption (which I believe is safe) that Blizzard would make a fantastic game. But if you still want to be uncharitably nitpicky let me rephrase:
I know 0 people who have any interest in WoW. I know at least 10, probably more, who would be extremely interested in Starcraft2.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Norway
Status:
Offline
|
|
Starcraft 2 would sell like free hardware in Korea. EVERYONE would get a copy! World of Warcraft would not...
|
|
pa[r-0X]ysm fragged your face!
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Apr 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by juanvaldes:
<STRONG>
You know 10 people who want a game that does not exist based soley on the name? What if they do make SC2 and **** it up as much as they have done with warcraft? Will those 10 people still want it because it is called "Star craft 2"?</STRONG>
Yep. And to top it off, they'd find excuses for all its suckiness
Reminds me of a certain something else... *cough*
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Chicago
Status:
Offline
|
|
I have no interest in World of Warcraft. I've been waiting for SC2 and it looks like I will have to be waiting some more.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
<b_monk forgot my pass>
|
|
Originally posted by Cipher13:
<STRONG>
Reminds me of a certain something else... *cough*</STRONG>
Yeah I remember Mac OS 9 and below...boy they sucked. Haha... 
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: England
Status:
Offline
|
|
Thats just a cheap journalist attempt at trying to make blizzard spill the beans.
They are working on starcraft 2 as before WoWC was anounced they said it wouldnt be SC2. It will probably use the same (probably slightly tweaked) engine as WarCraft 3.
its too profitable a franchise to drop.
--mafoo
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: dark side of the moon
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Mafoo:
<STRONG>Thats just a cheap journalist attempt at trying to make blizzard spill the beans.
They are working on starcraft 2 as before WoWC was anounced they said it wouldnt be SC2. It will probably use the same (probably slightly tweaked) engine as WarCraft 3.
its too profitable a franchise to drop.
--mafoo</STRONG>
moreover, they are probably waiting to see if everyone likes all the changes they are implementing in warcraft 3, a feeler for the next starcraft.
i cant and wont believe they wouldn't make another starcraft, it would be like never making another mariokart game
|

There's someone in my head but its not me...
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
<Eytee>
|
|
Originally posted by austeros:
<STRONG>
moreover, they are probably waiting to see if everyone likes all the changes they are implementing in warcraft 3, a feeler for the next starcraft.
i cant and wont believe they wouldn't make another starcraft, it would be like never making another mariokart game</STRONG>
I believe Blizzard issued a press release (unofficial) saying this exact thing. They will make a Starcraft II, but when is unknown.
Why isn't anyone interested in WoW? It looks fun, and it sounds like it'll be taking a great game and expanding it to a whole new level.
Eytee
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Salamanca, EspaƱa
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Cipher13:
<STRONG>
Yep. And to top it off, they'd find excuses for all its suckiness
Reminds me of a certain something else... *cough*</STRONG>
 You had to... Every single time.
And it is only in version 1.1.3 <sigh>
|
|
I could take Sean Connery in a fight... I could definitely take him.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
 |
Forum Rules
|
 |
 |
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|