Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Software - Troubleshooting and Discussion > Developer Center > NetBeans or Eclipse?

NetBeans or Eclipse?
Thread Tools
Senior User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 14, 2003, 04:25 PM
 
There's been plenty of recommendations in other threads about which IDE to use. But among these two, which is the best and why? I know that IBM has opted to support AWT instead of Swing in Eclipse, thereby possibly fragmenting Java. Is that a factor in your opinion? Which one has more industry support? If you had to choose one to base an entire product development cycle on, which would you choose?
(Last edited by NeXTLoop; Jan 14, 2003 at 09:57 PM. )
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2002
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 14, 2003, 09:13 PM
 
They're IDEs, not compilers.
[vash:~] banana% killall killall
Terminated
     
Senior User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 14, 2003, 09:57 PM
 
Thanks for the correction. Obviously, I'm just venturing into Java.
     
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Nov 2000
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 15, 2003, 01:01 PM
 
IBM is supporting SWT, not AWT. So many acroynms to choose from. IBM's choice to build their interface using SWT shouldn't be a deciding factor. From what I can tell, SWT runs on every platform that a sane developer would choose AND offers higher performance than Swing.

Netbeans/Forte has more industry support at the moment; however, Eclipse has some major players on board, including TogetherSoft and Rational.

Overall, I feel Eclipse is a better tool due to its tightly integrated unit testing and refactoring support. The incremental compiling is gravy.

One product manager I know just made his development team standardize on VIM and the shell for their development environment. Some of the team members bucked at having VIM shoved upon them, so he relaxed the requirements a bit and allowed any plain text editor. Fancy IDEs won't turn a poor programmer into a good one. Often, they will have the exact opposite effect when a programmer relies on the environment to make decisions for him.
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 17, 2003, 12:06 PM
 
I haven't been able to bring myself to use an IDE for Java (I use ant for building and BBEdit/vi for editing), but I have some really smart friends who swear by Eclipse. One of these days I'm going to give it another shot -- maybe it will make building deployment descriptors for J2EE apps less painful.
Mac Pro 2x 2.66 GHz Dual core, Apple TV 160GB, two Windows XP PCs
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:02 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2