 |
 |
No Java 5 in Tiger
|
 |
|
 |
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: London - England
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Minnesota
Status:
Offline
|
|
While it might be nice to give users the option to install Java 5, I, for one, won't miss it. I've been playing around with it on Windows for the past couple months and it still seems to be quite buggy.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
I am disappointed. Especially since I really doubt that 1.4 is 64-bit for Tiger. It could be, but I suspect that it's not. I routinely run java apps that take 4+GB of memory and the 32-bit version just chokes.
|
|
Mac Pro 2x 2.66 GHz Dual core, Apple TV 160GB, two Windows XP PCs
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: London - England
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Turias
While it might be nice to give users the option to install Java 5, I, for one, won't miss it. I've been playing around with it on Windows for the past couple months and it still seems to be quite buggy.
Any bugs in the JVM for Windows would hopefuly not be in the Mac version as they are engineered by different people.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: London, UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by rjudd
Any bugs in the JVM for Windows would hopefuly not be in the Mac version as they are engineered by different people.
I'm fairly sure Apple's Java is based on the Sun code.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Angus_D
I'm fairly sure Apple's Java is based on the Sun code.
It is based on the original Sun code, but a LOT of it is rewritten from scratch to make better use of hardware and OS it is running on. In fact, one of the Java engineers at Apple said that when they find a bug in the sun code, they report it to Sun, and then duplicate the bug in their own code, to make sure that the Java applications behave the same on Mac as on other platforms.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: in front of the keyboard
Status:
Offline
|
|
I too am disappointed in the lack of a 64-bit JVM in Tiger. (either 1.4 or 1.5).
|
|
signatures are a waste of bandwidth
especially ones with political tripe in them.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Oct 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
Well, I hope that whenever they do plan on releasing it, it fixes the full-screen on CRT monitors bug. Currently you can't go higher than 800x600 on a CRT monitor.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Oct 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
Ok, it has been released a few days ago, but it's not quite easy to actually "turn it on"... so to speak.
So for those that are wondering how, do this:
Go into /Applications/Utilities/Java/J2SE 5.0/ and run the preference program in there to set the version that Applets use.
Next open up the Terminal and type in:
Code:
# cd /System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Versions/
# sudo rm CurrentJDK
# sudo ln -s 1.5.0 CurrentJDK
Now everything should use the new version. Don't know why Apple made this so difficult.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jul 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
So that programs that specifically request a certain version of Java will get the right one?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Moderator Emeritus 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Austin, MN, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by itistoday
Ok, it has been released a few days ago, but it's not quite easy to actually "turn it on"... so to speak.
So for those that are wondering how, do this:
Go into /Applications/Utilities/Java/J2SE 5.0/ and run the preference program in there to set the version that Applets use.
Next open up the Terminal and type in:
Code:
# cd /System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Versions/
# sudo rm CurrentJDK
# sudo ln -s 1.5.0 CurrentJDK
Now everything should use the new version. Don't know why Apple made this so difficult.
I would cut that down to:
Code:
# cd /System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Versions/
# sudo ln -shf 1.5.0 CurrentJDK
Feels safer, but maybe it's just me.
Thanks for the tip though. Is that anywhere in the official documentation?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Oct 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Xeo
I would cut that down to:
Code:
# cd /System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Versions/
# sudo ln -shf 1.5.0 CurrentJDK
Feels safer, but maybe it's just me.
Thanks for the tip though. Is that anywhere in the official documentation?
If it is, I couldn't find it. 
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Jun 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Jun 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
 |
Forum Rules
|
 |
 |
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|