 |
 |
Is Google BSing Us Here?
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Rockville, MD
Status:
Offline
|
|
On this page, we are told:
Don't use "&id=" as a parameter in your URLs, as we don't include these pages in our index.
I am guilty of this infraction, but I would swear that my pages with "&id" in the URL are indeed indexed. To wit, if you execute: this search, The first listing is for a Barridoff Galleries page with — you guessed it — "&id" in the URL. What gives, do you suppose, gang?
EDIT: Actually, it turns out I use "?id=", not "&id". Does this mean I'm in the clear?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status:
Offline
|
|
? begins the first of URL-passed variables. The & allows you to add more. If you were using a single variable:
http://somesite.com/index.php?name=Tom
If you wanted to use multiple variables:
http://somesite.com/index.php?name=Tom&city=Vancouver&age=20
I don't see why Google would index a site with a single variable of the name 'id' in its URL, but not if 'id' is one of a few other variables.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Rockville, MD
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Tomchu
You're correct, of course. Thanks for reminding me/clarifying for others.
I don't see why Google would index a site with a single variable of the name 'id' in its URL, but not if 'id' is one of a few other variables.
Nor do I. It seems a little bit preachy as a matter of style on their part and not grounded in a real technical issue.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status:
Offline
|
|
Hmm ...
At this point, I'm willing to bet that it's merely a typo/written ambiguously, and we're misinterpreting it, or that Google is off its rocker.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Rockville, MD
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Tomchu
At this point, I'm willing to bet that it's merely a typo/written ambiguously, and we're misinterpreting it, or that Google is off its rocker.
I'd write to Google and ask them which of the two it is, but I'd probably never get a real response.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Rockville, MD
Status:
Offline
|
|
You know what else I don't understand? My website gets only three results when I do a Google search for inbound links, even though I know that there are many more than that. What gives? Should I submit URLs of places I know are linking to us, or is that a waste of time?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Senior User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Status:
Offline
|
|
if im not mistaken i think you can do ; in ur urls instead of &
I think they do the same.
edit:
Yea. my forums does it. and it works just fine.
|
|
You shouldn't make fun of nerds... you'll be working for one some day.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Rockville, MD
Status:
Offline
|
|
This still doesn't answer my original question: If "&id=" is forbidden by Google, does that mean other strings, like "?id=" are implicitly legal?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Are Eye
Status:
Offline
|
|
I inherited a site with ?id=X in many of the URIs and despite the site's high page rank, most of the pages are not indexed. Or at least they don't seem to be after some casual googling. Interesting.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
 |
Forum Rules
|
 |
 |
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|