 |
 |
OMG! O'Reilly BOOKS FOR MAC!
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Eagan, MN
Status:
Offline
|
|
If you've never read an O'Reilly Book before, they're truly excellent. They typically cover a topic from absolute beginner to rather advanced in only 300-1000 pages. I was always disheartened that O'Reilly had never released ANYTHING for Mac (the closest thing was a CodeWarrior for Palm book). Well, I logged onto the Apple Developer page today and was treated to THIS among the random images that appear on the frontpage:
I'm so excited!!!!
------------------
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Admin Emeritus 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Boston, MA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Thanks for bringing that to attention. I had absolutely no idea that O'Reilly would ever make OS X dev books.
Hey! Is that Clarus?
|
|
"Against stupidity, the gods themselves contend in vain" (Schiller)
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Eagan, MN
Status:
Offline
|
|
They always have the bio of the cover animal in the back of the book. It would be interesting to see what they say if it IS Claris
Oh, and I was wrong above. O'Reilly *does* have one Mac book: AppleScript in a Nutshell.
------------------
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Staffs, UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
The published "Real Basic - The Definitive Guide" quite some time ago - Ok, that's a book about a Mac application, rather than about the Mac itself, but it's close enough.
They also have a whole series of "Missing Manual" books, although these are different to the 'standard' O'Reilly books.
I've pre-ordered my "Learning Cocoa" book already from Amazon - it's something like 700 in the best sellers already...
I'd like to see them publish a book about the OS itself - a systems administrator's guide or something. All their Unix-related books are relevant for MacOS X though.
Still, this is great news. 'bout time too.
...and if you've never looked at an O'Reilly book you don't know what you are missing. Simply so much better than any others that it's not funny.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Glasgow
Status:
Offline
|
|
This is really, really cool. If nothing else it lends a certain credibility amongst non-mac (particularly UNIX) developers.
Woo-hoo!
|
|
PowerBook G4 17"
Power Mac G4/800, 1Gb RAM, 80Gb HDD, Superdrive, GeForce 4MX, Gateway 21" CRT, Apple Pro Speakers, iSub - Running Mac OS X Server 10.2
iBook 500, 192MbRAM - Running Mac OS X 10.2
iPod 5Gb
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Eagan, MN
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Gee4orce:
The published "Real Basic - The Definitive Guide"
I have that book. But REALbasic is so incomplete, it's hard for me to think of it as something worth developing with.
------------------
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Senior User
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: oakland, ca usa
Status:
Offline
|
|
ya, o'reilly is the utlimate cred for OS X. Clarus - o Clarus, please exist beyond classic!
how sad it is to see a fisher price character in the page setup dialog.
Mooooooooooooooooooooooooof!
.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Senior User
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Rochester, uk
Status:
Offline
|
|
yes! After worrying about incomplete documentation from Apple, we now have something infinitely better to work with.
sadie is happy.
|
|
All words are lies. Including these ones.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Staffs, UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by mr_sonicblue:
I have that book. But REALbasic is so incomplete, it's hard for me to think of it as something worth developing with.
??? in what way incomplete ? It's not supposed to be a replacement for Project Builder / Interface Builder. It's more of a Visual Basic for the Mac.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Eagan, MN
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Gee4orce:
??? in what way incomplete ? It's not supposed to be a replacement for Project Builder / Interface Builder. It's more of a Visual Basic for the Mac.
VB can be expanded with controls created in other languages. Can you expand REALbasic this way (I don't think you can, but I could be wrong)?
For Windows developement, people often create control classes in C++ (for speed) and put them together in VB (for ease). That's an important role that REALbasic doesn't play.
------------------
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: London, UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
You can create REALbasic controls in C++ using the plugins SDk, but I don't know if it's terribly easily REALbasic is actually pretty extensible, but it still sucks 
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Eagan, MN
Status:
Offline
|
|
Not to mention that it uses BASIC.......which seems rather primitive now that I know C/C++/Objective-C.
------------------
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Admin Emeritus 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Status:
Offline
|
|
Well, it's a spinoff of Visual Basic, which bears no resemblance to the BASIC of olde!
tooki
P.S. My contact at O'Reilly has told me that sample chapters from their OS X books will be available on their website in the next few weeks. I will be sure to post links as soon as I get them. O'Reilly is also releasing a book on AppleScript!! YAY!!!!! See http://mac.oreilly.com/ .
[This message has been edited by tooki (edited 04-14-2001).]
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Senior User
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Rochester, uk
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by mr_sonicblue:
Not to mention that it uses BASIC.......which seems rather primitive now that I know C/C++/Objective-C.
I used to think Java was the Bee's Knees (tm) until I tried Objective-C. Now I'm worried that C++ will be a step downwards. (and from what I've seen of C#, i won't even bother worrying).
|
|
All words are lies. Including these ones.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
 |
Forum Rules
|
 |
 |
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|