</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Geneva, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="1" face="Geneva, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif">Originally posted by pauld:
<strong>I'd love to see the raw data on BLAST speeds on Xserve v Sun but there doesn't seem to be a link from this story.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="1" face="Geneva, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif">I think this was posted fairly recently:
<a href="http://www.apple.com/xserve/performance.html" target="_blank">http://www.apple.com/xserve/performance.html</a>
I have no idea what BLAST does, but the results sure look impressive:
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Geneva, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="1" face="Geneva, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif">From Apple.com:
<strong>At the short word length of 9, the Xserve is 21 times faster than the IBM eServer x330 and 52 times faster than the Sun Fire V100. Xserve performs this search in only 9 minutes, versus nearly 3 hours on the IBM eServer x330, and over 7 hours on the Sun Fire V100.
Even though NCBI-BLAST has been optimized for searches of word lengths of 11, Xserve outperforms the IBM eServer x330 and the Sun Fire V100 at this word length by 5% and 163%, respectively.
At the long word length of 40, Xserve is 5.8 times faster than the IBM eServer x330 and 13.4 times faster than the Sun Fire V100 — Xserve completes this search in approximately 16 seconds, while the IBM x330 takes 96 seconds.
</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="1" face="Geneva, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif">Hope that's what you were looking for.
-Heady
<small>[ 07-11-2002, 08:14 PM: Message edited by: Heady ]</small>