Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Our Archives > General Archives > Servers > OS X and Macintosh Manager Compatibility

 
OS X and Macintosh Manager Compatibility
Thread Tools
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: California, USA
Status: Offline
Mar 24, 2001, 06:15 PM
 
Hi everyone!

I was curious.... Could someone with access to an AppleShareIP server let me know if the retail version of OS X finds and works correctly with the currently available AppleShareIP server? It seems obvious that it will with OS X Server 2.0 when it comes out, but I was just curious if it is backwards compatible.

I was also wondering if anyone has any info on whether or not OS X Server 2.0 will have backwards compatability when it comes to the Macintosh Manager. The school I administer computers/networking for still uses many computers with the current AppleShareIP server that will not be able to run OS X and it would make me extremely happy if they would work seemlessly with the new server....

Any speculations?

-Joel
     
Joel  (op)
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: California, USA
Status: Offline
Mar 24, 2001, 11:08 PM
 
I suppose it helps to read the FAQ, no?

"Q. What client systems are supported by Macintosh Manager 2.0?

A. Macintosh Manager 2.0 is designed to support client systems running Mac OS 8.1 (PowerPC and 64040 processor–based Macintosh computers) through Mac OS 9.1. Macintosh Manager 2.0 does not yet provide support for management of Mac OS X systems."

Well, this made me feel better for about a second. Then I read the last sentence. Ack! I'm assuming this won't be the case when MM 2.0 is actually released, right??

-Joel
     
gkorper
Guest
Status:
Mar 27, 2001, 10:13 AM
 
There is no Macintosh Management client for Mac OS X and that will not change with the release of Server 2.0 (unless there is some Apple ultra stealth project). One would expect that on or before the date that Macs are shipped with Mac OS X that there would probably be a solution for integrating those Macs into a Macintosh Manager network.
     
MacTroll
Guest
Status:
Apr 5, 2001, 11:00 PM
 
The current solution for some of the MacManager functionality is NetInfo in OSX. This will allow you to have the same logins and desktops across many machines, however you won't get the granular control that you have in MacManager.

In some of the more recent betas of server there is a full blown MacManager server and admin utility, but there doesn't seem to be the client yet, although this functionality shouldn't be too hard to implement. Heck they have network assistant working, for the most part, in the betas so why not MacManager.
     
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Mahwah, NJ USA
Status: Offline
Apr 12, 2001, 02:39 AM
 
OS-X (server an client) currently uses netinfo. The server has allways used it. Macintosh Manager (MM) was a kludge that Apple made so that MacOS < X could make some use of the multiuser capabilities of the server. It is essentially a client wrapper to the netinfo network database on the server.

Netinfo is similar to YP, NIS, NIS+, and LDAP... in that it is a network database. It is also somewhat compatible with them too.

MacOS-X (client) doesn't need MM because it allready "understands" netinfo. However, Apple may make a GUI wrapper to interface with management side of netinfo.

We found MM to be so unreliable and difficult to use we switched the OS-X server over to Linux and used netatalk to serve the Macs, Samba for the Wintel boxes, and NFS/NIS for the Unix boxes. This made it so that all users could have access to their data from whatever client they wanted to access it from.

Using Linux has given us MUCH finer control of resources and has been MUCH more reliable than MM. We have over 250 Macs where I work and no one uses MM anymore. If Apple fixes it AND supports it again we probably won't switch back to MM... why fix it if it ain't broke?

-DU-...etc...
-DU-...etc...
     
MacTroll
Guest
Status:
Apr 13, 2001, 05:26 PM
 
While what you say is very true. MM still has some very cool functionality that netinfo, or most any other lab admin system, can't replicate.

For instance MM will allow you to check out a laptop. It will automatically put your home folder on your laptop and then synch it back up with the server when you get back. Sure you can do this by hand, and maybe even script it yourself, but it isn't as elegant.

Additionally MM will allow you to restrict access to only certain CDs from the internal drive. I don't believe you can do this with NIS. Now this may not be very exciting for most people, but in a school environment or other "hostile" environment this is a really nice feature.

Hopefully there will be a combination of NetInfo stability with MM capability. The trade off is the more functionality you put into the system the higher the overhead. A lot of MM implementations suffer because of the strain on the network. Not that I am saying this is why you removed it from yours.

Certainly the MM interface is much, much nicer than NetInfo.

I am interested in what finer control you got with Linux then with MM.
     
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Mahwah, NJ USA
Status: Offline
Apr 14, 2001, 01:53 AM
 
Originally posted by MacTroll:
While what you say is very true. MM still has some very cool functionality that netinfo, or most any other lab admin system, can't replicate.
Perhaps you don't have much experience with NFS/NIS and network databases. As I said before... Macintosh Manager is just a wrapper... an app... that gives you a GUI front end to managing the netinfo database. It can not do anything that netinfo can't do.

Got that... I have several students that use laptops... many of them are dual boot. They can sync their /home/userid directory (under Linux) AND their My Documents folder (under Windows) AND their whatever folders (under Mac). This was fairly trivial to set up... I don't have to activate it on a per user basis all they need is an account on the server. They have control and responsibility of what gets synced and when. Since we have made this service available many of the students back up ALL their work to the server because we make regular backups to a second array of disks of /home and /var/lib every night. This gives them a fast way to restore data. In addition... once the mirror is done it is backed up to tape every night.

The utility of all of this is that a student can work seamlessly between home/dorm/lab without having to lug around zip disks and floppies (or even a laptop). Even better... for students that run Linux in their dorm we allow them to rsync to the server.

The main advantage to all this is that it doesn't matter what client system they run. Some prefer Mac, some Windows, and some Linux... our system allows them to use their system of choice and have access to their data in a central place, reliably backed up, and secure. All of this is centrally managed on the server... the server can be remotely managed via ssh, swat, and/or linuxconf. While MM and MacOS-X server are capable of serving Mac clients they are not capable of serving non-Mac clients... not without a kludge of different programs that are too expensive for us and may not integrate well together. I think the license for "Dave" is $150/client.


Again... perhaps you don't have much experience with other network databases. All of this is doable AND done via NIS/NFS/atalk/Samba. Not just CDs but entire sections of the file system on the server. All of this is "built in" on a Linux system. We have duplicated the exports that we had under MM but now it is under atalk to the Macs. We have no loss of functionality or fine grained control. One problem we had with MM was printing. Seems that it would "forget" what printers were set up and who was allowed to print from where. This was one of the main reasons for switching over. All of that is in the past.

I think netinfo is inherently stable... it HAS to be. I am not so trusting of MM however. We had the problems with the printing an also with just "forgetting" permissions, extreme lag in propagation of changes, and even some reports of data loss (I never saw that personally).

We have a 100Mbit/s switched network... mebbe we need Gigabit? I don't think MM was straining the network anymore than Macs normally do.

While the interface is OK. I really don't think it is all that well laid out. Can't give specifics because I dumped it over a year ago... and I don't have to remember anything about it. Netinfo has the niutil CLI and it is definitely not easy to learn how to use. It would be somewhat trivial to write a decent frontend to that IF one knows and understands NetInfo well.

I am interested in what finer control you got with Linux then with MM.
Not neccessarily "finer" but certainly easier, quicker, more consistent control. Ferinstance... we have a network folder on all clients for general lab use. In that folder are subfolders with ALL lab data, experiments, and relevant documents... these are read only for the generic user. There is one and only one subfolder they can write to called Public. Anyhting they write to there can be read and copied by anyone else but another user can not change or delete a file a different user has created. The generic user has access to one and only one printer... the one in the same room as the Mac.

For users with regular accounts on the server they have access to their /home/userid directory and also to the Public directory... they also have access to any printer in the lab (we have six total). Another nice thing that didn't seem to work properly under MM is users preferences and bookmark folders for Netscape... those are all centrally located on the server in their /home/userid directory.

In short... the main reason we switched is due to Linux ability to "talk" to all the clients in a consistent and reliable way. The cost was another significant factor in our decision.

YMMV

-DU-...etc...
-DU-...etc...
     
 
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:07 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2