 |
 |
Safari Fonts -- which do you use?
|
 |
|
 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
What fonts do you use in Safari (or whatever browser), for standard and fixed-width?
I'm getting tired of Lucida Grande or Times and am looking for some other fonts that look good for web-browsing.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Status:
Offline
|
|
I've used Marty Pfeiffer's Nu Sans font as my default Web browser font for many years. It's shareware, but it's worth every last cent. The Web looks like it was made for this font, I tell you.
No joke. Pfeiffer offers a basic version of the font as a free demo. The limited version doesn't look as good in bold or italic, but it will give you a good demonstration of just how awesome this thing is.
And no, I'm not normally a font geek. In fact, I've never gotten this worked up over a font before. It's not something I would recommend for print use -it doesn't look all that good on paper- but nothing beats it onscreen.
|
|
You are in Soviet Russia. It is dark. Grue is likely to be eaten by YOU!
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
Now people have finally an operating system with "$10,000 and more worth of fonts" and still need to buy some.
-
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Felton, CA
Status:
Offline
|
|
I use Lucida Grande. Nice and boring.
|
|
Trainiable is to cat as ability to live without food is to human.
Steveis... said: "What would scammers do with this info..." talking about a debit card number!
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: ~/
Status:
Offline
|
|
I've been looking for something other than the standards... (Times, etc...). I was using Optima for a while as the main proportionally spaced font for a while, but got tired of it. I've tried just about every standard serif variation (Times, Times New Roman, New York, Baskerville, Georgia, etc) So far nothing I like.
I may just have to try the Nu series of fonts suggested in the previous post. They look nice on the author's web page.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
Thanks for the replies. I like Nu Sans, which I didn't know about before, but haven't decided if I like it enough to register or whether to try more free fonts.
On a related note, I really dislike Arial. What's the easiest way to make pages display with something else instead of Arial? Can I trick the computer by replacing the Arial font with some other font re-named to Arial?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Dec 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
Well, I gave Nu Sans a try, and while it looks nice with words and letters, any numerical characters look awful. They are too wide, and jaggy.
Is that just a limitation of the demo version, or is the registered font like that?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Detroit, MI
Status:
Offline
|
|
I am using the Tahoma/Courier combination
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by CharlesS:
Well, I gave Nu Sans a try, and while it looks nice with words and letters, any numerical characters look awful. They are too wide, and jaggy.
Is that just a limitation of the demo version, or is the registered font like that?
I don't notice jaggies in the registered version's numerical characters. I know that the full version has better hinting, so that may be why I don't see them.
In terms of width, while the 1 character does seem a bit wide, I don't really notice it in any of the others. Perhaps I should post a screenshot?
|
|
You are in Soviet Russia. It is dark. Grue is likely to be eaten by YOU!
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by CharlesS:
Well, I gave Nu Sans a try, and while it looks nice with words and letters, any numerical characters look awful. They are too wide, and jaggy.
Is that just a limitation of the demo version, or is the registered font like that?
I think that's just with the demo version. Marty Pfeiffer's webpage says the demo does not have "international characters or other doodads" so maybe numbers are doodads?
The page has a gif image here of the font and numbers look fine.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Apr 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
Tried a lot of them and settled on Arial. I like its looks.
|
 3.06 iMac, 1 TB HD, 4 G RAM; MBP 2.16G; 250G HD; 1 & 1.5TB/160G FW EHDs; OS X 10.6.4, QT 7.6.6P;
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Dec 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Millennium:
I don't notice jaggies in the registered version's numerical characters. I know that the full version has better hinting, so that may be why I don't see them.
In terms of width, while the 1 character does seem a bit wide, I don't really notice it in any of the others. Perhaps I should post a screenshot?
Here's a screenshot from my web page which has a long of numbers in it:

|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by CharlesS:
Here's a screenshot from my web page which has a long of numbers in it:
What browser is that? I definitely don't see this in the registered version, but it could be a browser thing as well (what with anti-aliasing and such).
|
|
You are in Soviet Russia. It is dark. Grue is likely to be eaten by YOU!
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
 |
Forum Rules
|
 |
 |
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|