 |
 |
Safari for Windows!?!
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Ireland
Status:
Offline
|
|
Wouldn't it be cool if Apple released Safari for windows, make those mandatory windows sessions much nicer.
I know it is never going to happen though and doesn't really make much sense... but it would bring the browser wars onto MS's own turf...
|
|
sheesh, that took 8 hours for me to be asked to change my sig...
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Cambridge UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
Mozilla Firefox is where the browser wars are at  Convert all your friends!
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Aug 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
I don't think it would make much of a dent in the Windows community. Plus Apple isn't really making any money off of it like with iTunes+iPods.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Ireland
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Krypton:
Mozilla Firefox is where the browser wars are at Convert all your friends!
yeah firefox is great 
|
|
sheesh, that took 8 hours for me to be asked to change my sig...
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: London, UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by dice:
Wouldn't it be cool if Apple released Safari for windows, make those mandatory windows sessions much nicer.
Not going to happen, but it's feasible that there could be some KHTML-based browsers on Windows with decent UEs. Anyway, as others have said Firefox is pretty palatable.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Washington, DC
Status:
Offline
|
|
It would be nice, but I would rather have Apple work on something else... something more iApp like.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Leiden, Netherlands
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by mitchell_pgh:
It would be nice, but I would rather have Apple work on something else... something more iApp like.
How about optimizing the OS, the farmeworks so we could use our macchine with less ram/disk.
How about working harder on the compiler.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Just a groove in "G"
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Ludovic Hirlimann:
How about optimizing the OS, the farmeworks so we could use our macchine with less ram/disk.
How about working harder on the compiler.
 I agree. Just one thign bugging me today. I copy over files to a fodler via the network, bam, they don't show up i nthe folder. I have to close it, re-open it, and so on, jsut to get to see them.
It's something so simple, but yet it seems so far fro mthe minds at Apple.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Manchester,UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
It wouldn't have to be Safari, a KHTML based browser would be real useful for Web dev. Lot's of small company's don't have a mac to test stuff on a KHTML browser for Windows would be the next best thing. (real useful for me at work)
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Edmond, OK USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Why not just port OS X to Windows (Windows, not x86) and be done with it? That way everybody gets his cut.
I can see the box now:
Mac OS X 10.4
System Requirements: Microsoft Windows XP
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2004
Location: norway
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by dice:
yeah firefox is great
Firefox totally rules, and is my default browser. Safari got poofed a long time ago
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top
