 |
 |
browsers
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Australia
Status:
Offline
|
|
hi. just wondering what browser I should be using on my iMac. G3 Slot Loader 500mhz 40GB Harddrive.
Internet explorer is slow and slows down the maching. I downloaded mozilla, but the installer doesnt work: it sits and doesnt download any data from the servers. so what do you use on OS9?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Automatic
Status:
Offline
|
|
I use iCab under Mac OS 9.
After try all the browser available under Mac OS X, I use iCab and Safari.
|
"That plane's dustin' crops where there ain't no crops."
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Status:
Offline
|
|
iCab and IE/Mac are really your only choices at this point. IE/Mac has much better standards support but is no longer being developed. iCab, meanwhile, is severely lacking in the CSS department, but is still under development, so there's always hope for The Next Version.
|
|
You are in Soviet Russia. It is dark. Grue is likely to be eaten by YOU!
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Madison, WI
Status:
Offline
|
|
Or you can find an older version of Netscape Navigator (the original one, before AOL trashed it). I think it was version 4.6 or 4.7...
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Yokohama, Japan
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Macola:
Or you can find an older version of Netscape Navigator (the original one, before AOL trashed it). I think it was version 4.6 or 4.7...
Noooooo! Netscape Navigator 4.x has horrible CSS and JavaScript support. If I were the original poster I'd be running IE.
Actually, I'd have switched to OS X and Safari, but that's another matter.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Madison, WI
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by wataru:
Noooooo! Netscape Navigator 4.x has horrible CSS and JavaScript support. If I were the original poster I'd be running IE.
Actually, I'd have switched to OS X and Safari, but that's another matter.
Notice I didn't comment on which was better or worse, just that there is another alternative for OS 9. Personally, I never used Navigator in OS 9 days.
This review may help:
http://www.wap.org/journal/os9browsers/default.html
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
netscape 7.0 - 7.02 will run on OS 9. You can find it at the evolt.org archive: http://browsers.evolt.org/?navigator/mac/7.02
may find something else at the archive that runs on OS 9 as well.
PS. what mozilla did you try? only 1.2.1 or earlier will work on OS 9
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Australia
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by madmacgames:
netscape 7.0 - 7.02 will run on OS 9. You can find it at the evolt.org archive: http://browsers.evolt.org/?navigator/mac/7.02
may find something else at the archive that runs on OS 9 as well.
PS. what mozilla did you try? only 1.2.1 or earlier will work on OS 9
i tried moziall1.2.1
my mac came with netscape 4.0 installed and Macola is right: it is shocking! i will have a look at the new Netscape. Is IE slow for any reason. On the apple website they have like a speed-o-meter and IE is last.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Millennium:
iCab and IE/Mac are really your only choices at this point. IE/Mac has much better standards support but is no longer being developed. iCab, meanwhile, is severely lacking in the CSS department, but is still under development, so there's always hope for The Next Version.
I don't think the more recent versions of iCab are that bad. It's a lot better than it used to be. Plus it has tabbed browsing.
|
|
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Chuckit:
I don't think the more recent versions of iCab are that bad.
Oh really? try viewing any XHTML/CSS site with it (that does not use tables for layout).
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by storer:
my mac came with netscape 4.0 installed and Macola is right: it is shocking! i will have a look at the new Netscape
netscape 4 is really old and terrible. netscape 7 is still slower than some other browsers like mozilla, but if given the choice of IE 5, iCab, or NS7, I would have to pick NS 7.
PS. the newest netscape (7.1) does not work on OS 9. from the version 7 "series", only 7, 7.01, or 7.02 works with OS 9, which can be found at that browser archive.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
X11 Mozilla is very fast but doesn't remember your settings. Or at least mine.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Yokohama, Japan
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by madmacgames:
netscape 4 is really old and terrible. netscape 7 is still slower than some other browsers like mozilla, but if given the choice of IE 5, iCab, or NS7, I would have to pick NS 7.
PS. the newest netscape (7.1) does not work on OS 9. from the version 7 "series", only 7, 7.01, or 7.02 works with OS 9, which can be found at that browser archive.
Even Netscape 7 can't handle CSS layout very well. I recommend steering clear of any and all Netscape versions. There's really no reason to use them since there's Mozilla.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Somewhere, but not here.
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity...
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by RooneyX:
X11 Mozilla is very fast but doesn't remember your settings. Or at least mine.
Hey, consider yourself lucky. I can't even get X11 Mozilla to launch on OS 9.
|
|
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Australia
Status:
Offline
|
|
thanks
mozilla is fantastic. it is fast and it does not slow down the rest of my applications.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by wataru:
Even Netscape 7 can't handle CSS layout very well. I recommend steering clear of any and all Netscape versions. There's really no reason to use them since there's Mozilla.
netscape 7 is based on Mozilla 1.0
netscape 7.1 (current release) is based on 1.4
Netscape 7.2 (due out soon) is based on 1.7
since 1.4, there hasn't been many CSS tweeks... and there haven't been to many since 1.0...
so it's rather unsubstantiated, since the code base is the same.
|
I always use protection when fscking my Mac... Do you?
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Washington, DC
Status:
Offline
|
|
Netscape 4.7 or IE for OS 9...
That's about your only choice.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Yokohama, Japan
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by mitchell_pgh:
Netscape 4.7 or IE for OS 9...
That's about your only choice.
As someone already mentioned, an old version of Mozilla is available for OS 9.
Regarding Netscape 7's CSS support: Maybe there haven't been many changes since 1.4, but Netscape just doesn't render a perfectly valid (and correct under Mozilla 1.7, Firefox, Safari, IE, etc.) CSS layout that I made for a site I did recently. Specifically, a div that should be fixed on the right appears on the left, overlapping another div.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by wataru:
As someone already mentioned, an old version of Mozilla is available for OS 9.
Regarding Netscape 7's CSS support: Maybe there haven't been many changes since 1.4, but Netscape just doesn't render a perfectly valid (and correct under Mozilla 1.7, Firefox, Safari, IE, etc.) CSS layout that I made for a site I did recently. Specifically, a div that should be fixed on the right appears on the left, overlapping another div.
Well that means that it doesn't work on older versions of Mozilla either then. Do you have an example of your problem anywhere? There's almost always another way to achieve the result you want. Also, just being syntactically correct doesn't mean it's structurally sound.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
 |
Forum Rules
|
 |
 |
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|