Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Software - Troubleshooting and Discussion > Applications > Do HTML and CSS need a reference implementation?

View Poll Results: Do web standards need a reference implementation?
Poll Options:
Yes, a reference implementation would be very helpful. 4 votes (100.00%)
No, the textual description is sufficient to implement a standards compliant browser. 0 votes (0%)
Voters: 4. You may not vote on this poll
Do HTML and CSS need a reference implementation?
Thread Tools
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FFM
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 19, 2005, 08:07 PM
 
What do you think, do HTML and CSS need a reference implementation, i. e. some sort of HTML renderer (not a full browser, no networking code, no speed optimization etc.) that correctly displays according to the standards and defines the standards in case of ambiguity? Or do you believe that the textual description of the web standards is sufficient to define them?

Would anybody see a benefit in an official reference implementation?
     
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Nov 2001
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 19, 2005, 09:09 PM
 
Originally posted by TETENAL:
What do you think, do HTML and CSS need a reference implementation, i. e. some sort of HTML renderer (not a full browser, no networking code, no speed optimization etc.) that correctly displays according to the standards and defines the standards in case of ambiguity? Or do you believe that the textual description of the web standards is sufficient to define them?

Would anybody see a benefit in an official reference implementation?
That would be nice, but seeing how hard it is for any currently existing browser to even implement say every property of CSS2, I don't see it happening. Who's going to pay for the development time of something like that?
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 19, 2005, 10:38 PM
 
"A reference implementation would be helpful" and "We can do without one" are not mutually exclusive options. I think both are probably true for CSS.

I don't think a reference implementation for HTML would be very useful at all, since it's just a markup language. If your browser can't properly parse markup, just throw in the towel right now. It's styling and measurements that mostly bite IE in the butt.
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2001
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 19, 2005, 11:31 PM
 
Originally posted by Chuckit:
"A reference implementation would be helpful" and "We can do without one" are not mutually exclusive options. I think both are probably true for CSS.

I don't think a reference implementation for HTML would be very useful at all, since it's just a markup language. If your browser can't properly parse markup, just throw in the towel right now. It's styling and measurements that mostly bite IE in the butt.
IE has parsing bugs as well. Some of them are used to hide CSS it can't understand from it.
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:53 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2