 |
 |
700mb file becomes larger in toast.
|
 |
|
 |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: May 2002
Location: melbourne, australia
Status:
Offline
|
|
hi
this is probably something very easy to explain but obviously not for me!
got my g5 yesterday so i thought 'let's burn that 700mb file that never used to fit onto a cd'.
using toast 6.09 i drop the file into it but it seems to expand the file and when i go to burn the dvd it's telling me that the file is too large.
i've done the 'get info' on the file and it seems to be 700mb.
the dvd's i'm using are some i bought at the apple store...all fancy and apple and expensive...
so, is this something i'm doing?
how can i fix this problem?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Status:
Offline
|
|
1. If you burn a CD in ISO-9660 format (in toast), you can get 702.3 MB on it
2. You're clearly trying to burn a Video DVD. If you were to burn that file as a data DVD it would fit (700 MB < 4.4 GB). If you ask it to convert to Video DVD it has to re-encode. Think of trying to burn a CD from a 2 hour mp3. The mp3 is only 50 MB, but obviously iti's not burning the compressed mp3 file to make an audio CD, what it's doing is burning the audio waveform in the format that Audio CD's are (uncompressed), and you can only fit 80 minutes of that on one Audio CD, no matter how compressed you can make that waveform in formats that are not allowed on Audio CDs.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: May 2002
Location: melbourne, australia
Status:
Offline
|
|
ok, i kinda get what you're saying as i expect a movie/tv/etc file to expand as it's encoded.
what seems perplexing is i was able to burn vcd files into cd's of around 350mb (for example). so a 700mb onto a dvd, even with the encoding process, doesn't seem to be a stretch. or is it more about the actual time length of the contents of the 700mb file rather than the mb component?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Yes, it's the actual length of the video that matters. Just like audio CDs can't go any longer than 80 minutes no matter how much you compressed the music on your hard drive.
|
|
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: May 2002
Location: melbourne, australia
Status:
Offline
|
|
ok, that makes sense.
what would be the way, do you think, to get a file like that onto a dvd to watch through a dvd player?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Status:
Offline
|
|
ffmpegX is probably the quickest way to author a VIDEO_TS folder of arbitrary compression, then you burn that with Toast under DVD (UDF). If it's under 2 hours (or you can trim it to be) you can use iDVD >=4.
I would recommend though, that you investigate how to just drive your TV with your mac. Doing all these lengthy and quality-reducing conversions, just to pander to your set top box, is going to get old real fast. What kind of mac do you have?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Admin Emeritus 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Uncle Skeleton
1. If you burn a CD in ISO-9660 format (in toast), you can get 702.3 MB on it
In fact, the maximum capacity varies depending on the disc. It varies by a few megabytes depending on the exact design of the disc.
tooki
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Anywhere but here.
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: May 2002
Location: melbourne, australia
Status:
Offline
|
|
thankyou all so far...very helpful!
ok, so i now have investigated the dual layer dvd option which seemed to be going well until 3 different burn attempts (two different files) which both ended prematurely with toast telling me there was not enough memory, each time it gets over half way through before the memory issue!
so does anyone have an idea on this? i've started to have a fiddle around and to be honest it made me feel like i was using os8 or 9 and i'd have to increase the virtual memory...surely not?!
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Sounds like a buffer underrun. Do you have the Buffer Underrun Protection option on in Toast?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: May 2002
Location: melbourne, australia
Status:
Offline
|
|
the last time i tried i did have it on. i've now turned it off so i'll have to give it a try.
but what does it do exactly?
ta!
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Status:
Offline
|
|
no, it should be on. it activates a hardware feature of the drive that can resume a burn with the laser in the same place, if the data stream gets interrupted.
I don't know then. Do you actually have dual layer media? Toast ought to know if you're trying the wrong one, but if it somehow doesn't, trying to burn 2 layer's worth of data on normal 1 layer media certainly would cause problems.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: May 2002
Location: melbourne, australia
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Uncle Skeleton
no, it should be on. it activates a hardware feature of the drive that can resume a burn with the laser in the same place, if the data stream gets interrupted.
I don't know then. Do you actually have dual layer media? Toast ought to know if you're trying the wrong one, but if it somehow doesn't, trying to burn 2 layer's worth of data on normal 1 layer media certainly would cause problems.
well i got the same error message with it off (hmmm...).
for the record its error message #20.
toast i think 'knows' its dual layer and the annoying thing is it takes awhile to know if its not going to work as the encoding takes so long...extending out the annoyance...
thanks all so far!
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: May 2002
Location: melbourne, australia
Status:
Offline
|
|
ok think i have an answer of sorts...toast 6 doesn't like to burn in tiger.
what i've enjoyed about this process was that i started on trying to fit the file onto the dvd, solve that then find out toast is kinda broken in 10.4...
this is from another person's post on the roxio forum...
"Here I thought it was just me, but I'm also going through similar problems. I have Quicktime movies I wish to make into simple DVD's, just pop it in and play, but everytime I try, it crashes halfway with no reason. This was after I installed Tiger, before, 6.0.9 chugged away with no problems.
When I upgraded to OS X 10.4, that was when Toast crashed almost every time. Even when I installed the 6.1 update, there're still crashes.
I have a G5 with 1,8Ghz CPU, 1.5 GB ram and plenty of hard drive space. I've been using Toast since version 5 when I could take any video file that quicktime could play (Mov, Divx, AVI) and convert it to DVD. But now, it's just taking up space. I'm hoping some update comes out soon. "
well, at least i know it's not my new computer just my new operating system breaking things...
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: zurich, switzerland
Status:
Offline
|
|
Hi, just a quick question. What is the length, in minutes of that 700 mb file you're trying to burn?
|
|
weird wabbit
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: May 2002
Location: melbourne, australia
Status:
Offline
|
|
around 80mins, that's why i have been trying the dual layer dvd after the advice on the single layers not working for the file.
but as it appears toast and 10.4.1 don't like each other its sorta a moot point!
i am curious if there is another effective encoding and burning program...
ta
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: zurich, switzerland
Status:
Offline
|
|
If you look under "backup" under utilities on macupdate, you'll find a few. I have no idea how good or bad they are. I actually used to use xcdroast.org on my old Titanium powerbook and although the interface is absolutely disgusting (X11 app), it can do almost anything, but I don't think there's a Tiger version out yet.
|
|
weird wabbit
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
 |
Forum Rules
|
 |
 |
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|