 |
 |
.pkg versus .mpkg?
|
 |
|
 |
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Aug 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
Hello,
Could someone please tell me the difference between a .pkg file and am .mpkg file?
When installing some software directly from the DVD, I see that some files are called, for example, iMovie.pkg, and others iMovie.mpkg. In what ways are they different?
Thanks,
Mac_Jack
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Status:
Offline
|
|
If I recall correctly, .mpkg folders are Meta-Packages. These contain regular packages, the .pkg folders you're seeing.
The reason for this is that you can't actually customize installations from a .pkg installer. This is a limitation of Apple's installer technology more than anything else. They get around it with these meta-packages, which contain packeges that you can turn on and off. It's a crude method of customizing installations, but it's gotten the job done for Apple so far.
|
|
You are in Soviet Russia. It is dark. Grue is likely to be eaten by YOU!
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Aug 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
Ah, gotcha. So if I wanted to do a basic install, I could use either the .mpkg or the .pkg, it wouldn't matter. If I wanted to customize at all, I'd use the .mpkg.
Thanks. You're everywhere; you answered my virus questions yesterday.
Jack
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Dec 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Millennium
If I recall correctly, .mpkg folders are Meta-Packages. These contain regular packages, the .pkg folders you're seeing.
The reason for this is that you can't actually customize installations from a .pkg installer. This is a limitation of Apple's installer technology more than anything else. They get around it with these meta-packages, which contain packeges that you can turn on and off. It's a crude method of customizing installations, but it's gotten the job done for Apple so far.
Well, .mpkgs don't necessarily contain packages. They link to a bunch of packages, but they can be anywhere on the disk, as long as you can put a path to the packages in the Info.plist file in the .mpkg. Now, .mpkg packages can contain packages in their bundle, but they don't have to.
Also, as to not being able to customize installations from a .pkg installer, in Tiger the package format has a sort of interesting distribution script system that allows .pkgs to do many of the things that .mpkgs can do, so the line might become a little more blurred in the future...
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Aug 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
Gotcha. Thanks very much for your help.
|
|
Mac_Jack
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
 |
Forum Rules
|
 |
 |
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|